SilverCloud as a School-Based Intervention for Vulnerable Youth

March 24, 2026 updated by: NYU Langone Health

Hybrid Type I Effectiveness-implementation Trial of SilverCloud as a School-based Intervention for Vulnerable Youth

The goal of this study is to test the efficacy and feasibility of a clinician-guided, app-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) program, SilverCloud, as a school-based mental health intervention for vulnerable youth. An open trial of SilverCloud will be conducted to determine preliminary efficacy in this sample and inform program refinements by collecting outcome self-report assessments and conducting interviews on feasibility and acceptability. After the program and its implementation strategy are refined, we will conduct an randomized controlled trial. Adolescents who seek or are referred for mental health services through one of the study sites and screen positive for significant mental health symptoms will be randomized to receive SilverCloud or treatment as usual (TAU). Efficacy will be assessed through outcome self-reports. Feasibility and acceptability feedback will again be collected from participants, SBHC staff, and community members.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • New Jersey
      • New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States, 08901
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Rutgers University
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Erum Nadeem, Ph.D.
    • New York
      • Brooklyn, New York, United States, 11220
        • Recruiting
        • NYU Langone Health
      • Glen Oaks, New York, United States, 11004
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Northwell Health School Mental Health Partnership sites
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Vera Feuer, MD
        • Contact:
          • Glen Oaks

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

In order to be eligible to participate in the phase I open trial of this study, an individual must meet all of the following criteria:

  • Enrolled in a high school
  • Score of 10+ on GAD-7 or PHQ-9
  • Speak/read English. The current investigational version of SilverCloud that will be used in this study is only available in English.

In order to be eligible to participate in the RCT of this study, an individual must meet all of the following criteria:

  • Enrolled in 9th through 11th grades.
  • Score of 10+ on GAD-7 or PHQ-9
  • Enrolled in one of the study sites
  • Speak/read English. The current investigational version of SilverCloud that will be used in this study is only available in English.

Exclusion Criteria:

An individual who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in the phase I open trial of this study:

  • Does not use a smartphone
  • Mental health concerns for which intensive treatment is indicated. Because SilverCloud has not been evaluated in people with serious mental illness, participants who exhibit symptoms of mania or psychosis will be referred to a higher level of care.
  • Current suicidal ideation with intent. Participants who have a suicide plan and intent to act on it will be referred to the SBHC suicide risk protocol and will not be eligible until their suicidal thoughts have abated.

An individual who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in the RCT of this study:

  • Current (within 1 month of enrollment) mental health treatment at one of the study sites
  • Does not use a smartphone
  • Mental health concerns for which intensive treatment is indicated. Because SilverCloud has not been evaluated in people with serious mental illness, participants who exhibit symptoms of mania or psychosis will be referred to a higher level of care.
  • Current suicidal ideation with intent. Participants who have a suicide plan and intent to act on it will be referred for crisis intervention through the site at which they were referred and will not be eligible until their suicidal thoughts have abated.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SilverCloud
Adolescents who seek or are referred for mental health services and screen positive for significant mental health symptoms randomized to receive SilverCloud.
SilverCloud is organized into eight core modules that follow evidence-based principles of CBT, along with six additional modules that can be prescribed by the clinician to address a participant's specific needs.
Other Names:
  • SilverCloud
Active Comparator: Treatment as Usual (TAU)
Adolescents who seek or are referred for mental health services and screen positive for significant mental health symptoms randomized to receive psychotherapy.
Psychotherapy with a licensed clinician at one of the study sites.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 8
The PHQ-9 is a 9-item questionnaire assessing the degree of depression severity. Items are ranked on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). The total score is the sum of responses and ranges from 0-27; higher scores indicate greater severity of depression.
Baseline, Week 8
Change in General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 8
The GAD-7 is a 7-item questionnaire assessing the degree of anxiety severity. Items are ranked on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). The total score is the sum of responses and ranges from 0-21; higher scores indicate greater severity of anxiety.
Baseline, Week 8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS-25) Youth Self-Report Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 8
The RCADS-25 is a self-report questionnaire that assesses symptoms of depression and anxiety in children and adolescents. Each item is rated as 0 (never), 1 (sometimes), 2 (often), or 3 (always). The raw score is the sum of responses and is converted to a T-score where: below 65 = normal range; between 65-69 = borderline clinical range; and 70 above = clinical range.
Baseline, Week 8
Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Item Bank v2.0 - Peer Relationships - Short Form 8a Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 8
This is an 8-item questionnaire assessing pediatric peer relationships. Each item is rated on a scale from 1 (never) to 5 (almost always). A raw score is calculated based on the sum of item responses. The raw score is converted to a T-score ranging from 0-100, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate stronger peer relationships.
Baseline, Week 8
Change in PROMIS Pediatric Item Bank v1.0 - Family Relationships - Short Form 8a
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 8
This is an 8-item questionnaire assessing pediatric family relationships. Each item is rated on a scale from 1 (never) to 5 (always). A raw score is calculated based on the sum of item responses. The raw score is converted to a T-score ranging from 0-100, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate stronger family relationships.
Baseline, Week 8
Change in PROMIS Pediatric Item Bank v1.0 - Sleep Disturbance - Short Form 8a
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 8
This is an 8-item questionnaire assessing pediatric sleep disturbance. Each item is rated on a scale from 1 (never) to 5 (always). A raw score is calculated based on the sum of item responses. The raw score is converted to a T-score ranging from 0-100, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate more prevalent sleep disturbance.
Baseline, Week 8
Change in School Engagement Scale Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 8
23-item questionnaire assessing engagement in school. Each item is rated on a 6-point scale ranging from 1-5. The total score is the sum of responses and ranges from 23 to 115. Higher scores indicate greater school engagement.
Baseline, Week 8

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anna Van Meter, PhD, NYU Langone Health
  • Principal Investigator: Erum Nadeem, PhD, Rutgers University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 8, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 17, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 22, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 30, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The de-identified participant data from the final research dataset used in the published manuscript will be shared with investigators whose proposed use of the data has been approved by the NIMH Data Archive. Data will be made available following article publication or as required by a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research. Data are available indefinitely through the NIMH Data Archive. The protocol and statistical analysis plan will be made available on Clinicaltrials.gov only as required by federal regulation or as a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Immediately following publication. No end date.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Investigators whose proposed use of the data has been approved by the NIMH Data Archive will be shared to achieve aims in the approved proposal. Data are available indefinitely through the NIMH Data Archive.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on App-based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)

Subscribe