Microfluidic Chip Method Versus Density-gradient Centrifugation Method in IVF

December 3, 2024 updated by: Professor Ernest Hung-Yu Ng

A Randomized Double-blind Controlled Study of the Cumulative Live Birth Rate of IVF Following Sperm Preparation by Microfluidic Chip Method Versus Density-gradient Centrifugation Method

Infertile patients attending IVF treatment at the Centre of Assisted Reproduction and Embryology, Queen Mary Hospital and Kwong Wah Hospital will be recruited during ovarian stimulation for IVF. Subsequently, they will be randomly assigned on the day of oocyte retrieval by a laboratory staff into one of the following two groups: (1) the microfluidic chip group and (2) the density gradient group for sperm preparation and subsequent use in fertilization. Other IVF procedures will be the same as our usual practice. Both patients and clinicians were blinded from the group allocation i.e. a double blind study. The primary outcome is the cumulative live birth rate defined as the number of pregnancies leading to live birth within 6 months of randomisation.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

The trial will compare the use of a microfluidic chip with the use of density gradient centrifugation for sperm preparation.

The hypothesis of the study is that the use of the microfluidic chip will improve the cumulative live birth rate of IVF compared to the density gradient method.

The trial will be conducted at the Centre of Assisted Reproduction and Embryology at Queen Mary Hospital and Kwong Wah Hospital. Infertile patients undergoing IVF treatment will be recruited during ovarian stimulation. They will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: the microfluidic chip group or the density gradient group. Both the patients and the clinicians will be blinded to the group allocation.

The inclusion criteria for the study are infertile women aged under 43 years undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF. The exclusion criteria include women undergoing certain genetic testing, male factor infertility requiring surgical sperm retrieval, the use of donor oocytes and spermatozoa, certain uterine conditions, previous participation in the study, and participation in other randomized trials.

The eligible women will undergo standard IVF procedures, including ovarian stimulation, monitoring of follicle growth, trigger for oocyte retrieval, and oocyte retrieval itself. On the day of oocyte retrieval, the women will be randomly assigned to either the microfluidic chip group or the density gradient group for sperm preparation.

Semen samples will be collected on the day of oocyte retrieval and evaluated according to standard guidelines. Sperm DNA damage will also be assessed using an alkaline single-cell gel electrophoresis assay. Depending on the randomization, the sperm samples will be prepared either using the microfluidic chip or the density gradient centrifugation method.

After sperm preparation, oocytes will be fertilized using either conventional insemination or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertilization will be confirmed by the presence of two pronuclei. Fresh embryo transfer will be performed 2-5 days after egg retrieval, and luteal phase support will be given. Excessive good quality embryos or blastocysts will be cryopreserved for future use.

For frozen embryo transfer, embryos or blastocysts will be replaced in subsequent natural or hormonal replacement cycles. Pregnancy will be confirmed by a urine pregnancy test, and transvaginal ultrasound will be performed to confirm viability and the number of fetuses.

Follow-up will be conducted to retrieve pregnancy and delivery data. The cumulative live birth rate will be calculated, and pregnancy outcomes, including birth weights and obstetric complications, will be recorded and compared between the two groups.

The study will continue until all cryopreserved embryos or blastocysts are used or until the participants become pregnant within 6 months after randomization. The pregnancy complications and congenital abnormalities will be monitored through hospital records or patient contact.

Ultimately, the study aims to determine whether the use of the microfluidic chip improves the cumulative live birth rate of IVF compared to the density gradient method.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1136

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Hong Kong
      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
        • Contact:
          • Ernest HY NG, MD
          • Phone Number: 852-22553400
          • Email: nghye@hku.hk
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ernest HY NG, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Infertile women aged <43 years at the time of ovarian stimulation for IVF

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women undergoing preimplantation genetic testing monogenic diseases, structural rearrangement of chromosomes or aneuploidy;
  • Male factor requiring surgical sperm retrieval such as microscopic epididymal sperm aspiration and testicular sperm extraction;
  • Use of donor oocytes and spermatozoa;
  • Submucosal fibroid or hydrosalpinx shown on pelvic scanning and not surgically treated;
  • Women who had been recruited into this study before and
  • Women joining other randomized trials

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: microfluidic chip method

Microfluidic chip method has been used for sperm sorting in order to select the most motile and morphologically normal sperm for use in assisted reproductive technologies (ART) such as in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

In the microfluidic chip method for sperm sorting, a small amount of semen sample is loaded onto the chip, which contains channels and chambers that allow for the separation of sperm based on their motility and morphology. The chip is designed to mimic the natural environment of the female reproductive tract, where sperm undergo a series of selection processes before reaching the egg.

The Sperm Separation Device - ZyMōt Multi 850µL (ZyMōt Fertility, Inc) will be used. The microfluidics chamber will be used according to the manufacturer's instructions. 850 μL of the semen sample will be inserted into the inlet port of the device and 750 μL of fertilization media will be inserted into the outlet port. The device with the semen sample inside will be incubated in 6% CO2 at 37°C. After 30 min, 500 μL of the sample at the outlet port will be removed from the outlet port and pipetted into a labelled test tube.
Active Comparator: density-gradient centrifugation method
Density-gradient centrifugation is a commonly used method for sperm separation and purification. It is a technique that involves layering a semen sample on top of a gradient of different densities of a solution, typically a mixture of colloidal silica and sucrose, and then centrifuging the sample. The centrifugal force causes the sperm to migrate through the gradient, where they become separated based on their density.
After liquefaction, sperm preparation will be completed by a discontinuous density gradient centrifugation method, using Pureception (CooperSurgical, Denmark) sperm density gradient media. The resulting sperm pellet after centrifugation will be washed once with the sperm washing medium (G-IVF Plus, Vitrolife, Sweden) The washed spermatozoa will be resuspended with the same medium, adjusting the final volume to 0.5 mL.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
cumulative live birth rate
Time Frame: within 6 months of randomisation.
cumulative live birth rate defined as the number of pregnancies leading to live birth within 6 months of randomisation.
within 6 months of randomisation.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Live birth beyond 22 weeks of gestation per the first embryo transfer or FET
Time Frame: 3 years
Live birth beyond 22 weeks of gestation per the first embryo transfer or FET
3 years
Positive urine pregnancy test per the first embryo transfer or FET
Time Frame: 3 years
Positive urine pregnancy test per the first embryo transfer or FET
3 years
Clinical pregnancy per the first embryo transfer or FET defined as presence of intrauterine gestational sac on scanning at gestational week 6.
Time Frame: 3 years
Clinical pregnancy per the first embryo transfer or FET defined as presence of intrauterine gestational sac on scanning at gestational week 6.
3 years
Ongoing pregnancy rate as presence of a fetal pole with pulsation at 8-10 weeks of gestation
Time Frame: 3 years
Ongoing pregnancy rate as presence of a fetal pole with pulsation at 8-10 weeks of gestation
3 years
Miscarriage defined as a clinically recognized pregnancy loss before the 22 weeks of pregnancy and whose denominator is the clinical pregnancy.
Time Frame: 3 years
Miscarriage defined as a clinically recognized pregnancy loss before the 22 weeks of pregnancy and whose denominator is the clinical pregnancy.
3 years
Multiple pregnancy: presence of more than one intrauterine sac at 6 weeks of gestation
Time Frame: 3 years
Multiple pregnancy: presence of more than one intrauterine sac at 6 weeks of gestation
3 years
Ectopic pregnancy rate
Time Frame: 3 years
Ectopic pregnancy rate
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 29, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 22, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 6, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Sharing Time Frame

after publication of the primary paper

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

reasonable request

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infertility

Clinical Trials on Microfluidic chip

Subscribe