National Multicenter Interventional Study Aimed at Evaluating the Effect on the Intestinal Microbiota in Chronically Frail Patients Who Share Alterations in Intestinal Function. (sPATIALS3)

'sPATIALS3' - National Multicenter Randomized Controlled Interventional Study, Comparing an Active Symbiotic and a Passive Symbiotic Aimed at Evaluating the Effect on the Intestinal Microbiota and on the State of Health and Well-being of Various Types of Chronically Frail Patients United by Alterations of Intestinal Function.

The objective of the study will be to understand whether a supplementation of the diet with an active symbiotic, i.e. characterized by a mix of probiotics and a specially selected fiber with prebiotic activity combined with a vegetable extract with beneficial activities on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, can reduce the relative inflammatory potential and improve absorption, intestinal motility and bowel habit of patients with various pathological conditions, such as ALS, ADHD and bronchial asthma.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Clinical survey conducted for research and study purposes, multicenter, focusing on ALS patients, elderly patients with chronic diseases, and pediatric patients with neurodevelopmental disorders. For each of the diseases treated, patients will be randomized into the two treatment arms (Study Group, GS; Control Group, GC) according to a block randomization, with a block size of 4 and an allocation ratio of 1:1. The randomization will be double-blind.

  • Study Group or GS: These subjects will be given an active symbiotic preparation consisting of two sticks of 1500mg each and of different colors.
  • Control group or GC:These subjects will be given a passive symbiotic preparation again consisting of two sticks of 1500mg each.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

64

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Milan, Italy, 20133
        • IBBA-CNR
      • Milan, Italy, 20162
        • Centro Clinico NEMO - Fondazione Serena Onlus, Milano
    • LC
      • Bosisio Parini, LC, Italy, 23842
        • Scientific Institute IRCCS Eugenio Medea
      • Casatenovo, LC, Italy, 23880
        • Alessia Fumagalli

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Population 1 : ALS

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age at enrollment ≥18 years;
  • ALS diagnosis defined or probable according to El Escorial criteria (Brooks et al., 2000);
  • Respiratory function with FVC% >50%.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects unable to give informed consent to the study;
  • presence of psychiatric disease or severe cognitive impairment;
  • presence of tracheotomy; presence of severe pre-existing gastrointestinal disease (e.g., ulcerative rectocolitis; Crohn's disease).

Population 2: ADHD

Inclusion Criteria:

  • children between 6 and 16 years old
  • children with ADHD, diagnosed with DSM-5 criteria and in accordance with the protocol shared by the Regional ADHD Reference Centers Lombardy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • presence of intellectual disability (QIT<70),
  • presence of neurological diseases, epilepsy
  • presence of genetic syndromes
  • treatment with drug therapies.

Co-diagnosis with other psychiatric or neurodevelopmental disorders (i.e. Autism, Anxiety, Depression etc) will not be considered a criterion of exclusion.

Population 3: Bronchial Ashtma

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adults above 18 years of age
  • diagnosed with Bronchial Ashtma following ERS-ETS criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • life expectancy less than 18 months
  • active respiratory infections
  • cognitive disorders that prevent participation to the study (MMS <24)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Probiotic + fiber

These subjects will be given a passive symbiotic preparation again consisting of two sticks of 1500mg each to be taken once a day:

  • Purple Sachet - Prebiotic - Composed of 500mg acacia fiber (Fibregum®) with high prebiotic activity and 500mg mai starch. Excipients and flavorings.
  • White Sachet - Probiotic - 30 Billion bacterial strains Lactobacillus plantarum LP (PBS067- EU Collection DSM 24937), Lactobacillus acidophilus L.
Fibregum non-active fiber product
Defense Plus probiotic complex
Experimental: Probiotic + Prebiotic

These subjects will be given an active symbiotic preparation consisting of two differently colored sticks of 1500mg each to be taken once a day:

  • Purple Sachet - Active Prebiotic - 500 mg of Fibregum®, a slow-fermenting prebiotic fiber and 500 mg of standardized extract of pigmented Zea Mays L fruit, rich in anthocyanins and polyphenols. Excipients and flavorings.
  • White Sachet - Probiotic - 30 Billion Bacterial Strains Lactobacillus plantarum LP (PBS067- EU Collection DSM 24937), Lactobacillus acidophilus LA (PBS066 - EU Collection DSM 24936) and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BL (BL050 - Eu Collection DSM 25566).
Defense Plus probiotic complex
Moradyn active prebiotic fiber product

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in levels of Short Chain Fatty Acids (SCFA)
Time Frame: Before and After 3 months of intervention
Evaluation of pre-post treatment variation of the level of specific SCFAs (acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid and valeric acid) both within the group of the treated and between the group of treated patients and the placebo group.
Before and After 3 months of intervention
Change in levels of branched chain fatty acids (isobutyrate and isovalerate)
Time Frame: Before and After 3 months of intervention
Evaluation of the pre-post nutritional variation of the level of branched chain fatty acids (isobutyrate and isovalerate) between the group of treated patients and the placebo group
Before and After 3 months of intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Conners' Parent Rating Scale-Revised - scale H (ADHD Index)
Time Frame: Before and After 3 months of intervention

The score of subscale H on the Conners' Parent Rating Scale-Revised allows to identify children / adolescents at risk of ADHD.

The score is a T-score with mean 50 and deviation standard 10 in the general population Minimum score = 35 Maximum score = 100

Higher scores correspond to greater severity:

>70 very atypical 66-70 moderately atypical 61-65 slightly atypical 56-60 borderline range

≤ 55 non problematic

Before and After 3 months of intervention
Conners' Parent Rating Scale-Revised - Scale K (total CGI)
Time Frame: Before and After 3 months of intervention

The score of subscale K on the Conners' Parent Rating Scale-Revised reflects a general problem behavior. A high score indicates a hyperactivity problem, often associated with other problem areas.

The score is a T-score with mean 50 and deviation standard 10 in the general population Minimum score = 35 Maximum score = 100

Higher scores correspond to greater severity:

>70 very atypical 66-70 moderately atypical 61-65 slightly atypical 56-60 borderline range

≤ 55 non problematic

Before and After 3 months of intervention
Conners' Parent Rating Scale-Revised - Scale B (attention problem)
Time Frame: Before and After 3 months of intervention

Higher scores in the subscale B on the Conners' Parent Rating Scale-Revised are are related to lower learning abilities and difficulties in sustaining prolonged levels of attention.

The score is a T-score with mean 50 and deviation standard 10 in the general population Minimum score = 35 Maximum score = 100

Higher scores correspond to greater severity:

>70 very atypical 66-70 moderately atypical 61-65 slightly atypical 56-60 borderline range

≤ 55 non problematic

Before and After 3 months of intervention
Conners' Parent Rating Scale-Revised - Scale C ( hyperactivity)
Time Frame: Before and After 3 months of intervention

Higher scores in the subscale C on the Conners' Parent Rating Scale-Revised are indicative of higher levels of restlessness and impulsivity.

The score is a T-score with mean 50 and deviation standard 10 in the general population Minimum score = 35 Maximum score = 100

Higher scores correspond to greater severity:

>70 very atypical 66-70 moderately atypical 61-65 slightly atypical 56-60 borderline range

≤ 55 non problematic

Before and After 3 months of intervention
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale - revised (ALSFRS-r)
Time Frame: Before and After 3 months of intervention
Functional assessment of disease state. maximum score 4 - minimum score 0; for 12 items. indicates normal condition - 0 corresponds to a degree of major severity. The total score can range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 48; a score <29 indicates rapid disease progression.
Before and After 3 months of intervention
Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS)
Time Frame: Before and After 3 months of intervention

Represents the main symptoms complained about by the patients. maximum score "Unbearable disturbances" - minimum score "No disturbance"; for 15 items.

The scores follow these directions:

No disturbance Mild disturbances Bearable disturbances Moderate disturbances Somewhat severe disturbances Severe disturbances Unbearable disturbances

Before and After 3 months of intervention
Forced Expiratory Volume - 1st second (FEV1)
Time Frame: Before and After 3 months of intervention
Expired Volume measured after 1 second during pneumotachography exam
Before and After 3 months of intervention
Forced Vital capacity (FVC)
Time Frame: Before and After 3 months of intervention
Inspired maximal volume during pneumotachography exam
Before and After 3 months of intervention
Asthma control test score
Time Frame: Before and After 3 months of intervention

Test containing items related to cough and breathlessness, validated in asthmatic subjects

Test contains five items scored on a 5-point scale (for symptoms and activities: 1=all the time to 5= not at all; for asthma control rating: 1=not controlled at all to 5=completely controlled)

Before and After 3 months of intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 10, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 22, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 22, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on ALS

Clinical Trials on Dietary fiber

Subscribe