Core Outcome Set for Head, Neck and Respiratory Disease in Mucopolysaccharidosis II (COHERE)

August 31, 2023 updated by: Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust

COHERE - Core Outcome Set for Head, Neck and Respiratory Disease in Mucopolysaccharidosis II

The Mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) are a family of genetic metabolic disorders, caused by specific enzyme deficiencies which result in accumulation of partially degraded glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) within various tissues. As GAGs are common in the body a number of different organ systems can be affected. Involvement of the upper and lower respiratory tract in MPS Type II results in significant airway compromise, with progressive airway obstruction being responsible for a significant proportion of the morbidity and mortality associated with this condition. Hearing loss is a universal finding in MPS, with a third of patients suffering with severe profound hearing loss. There is an unmet need for strong clinical evidence to guide treatment of head, neck and respiratory disease in MPS disorders. A Core Outcome Set (COS) describes the minimum outcome data that should be measured in a clinical study for a particular condition. The lack of an agreed COS for MPS II in general, and specifically head, neck and respiratory disease, makes comparison between studies difficult. There is also a lack of information detailing patient and parent perspectives on the MPS disorders. The ideal COS for head, neck and respiratory disease associated with MPS II would combine both patient/parent and clinician opinion and could be used in the design of all subsequent clinical studies. Following literature review the investigators have created a list of outcomes previously reported for qualitative and quantitative studies investigating head, neck and respiratory disease in MPS II. For the proposed research the investigators will seek opinions of patients, parents, clinicians and scientists to rate these outcomes via the Delphi method. Outcomes scored highest by patients, parents, clinicians and scientists will form a COS for head, neck and respiratory disease in MPS II. The development of a COS can help limit variability outcomes in studies investigating different interventions in MPS II.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

46

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Lancashire
      • Manchester, Lancashire, United Kingdom, M13 9WL
        • Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients and parents, clinicians and scientists

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Confirmed MPS II diagnosis.
  • Aged between 12 and 25 years old.
  • Parents/ main care givers of child with MPS Type II.
  • Adults aged 18 or over.
  • Clinicians responsible for direct care and management of at least 2 pediatric MPS Type II patients in the last 12 months.
  • Scientists who have worked with MPS Type II within the last 5 years

Exclusion criteria:

  • Unconfirmed MPS Type II diagnosis.
  • Aged below 12 and above 25 years old.
  • Not directly involved in a day to day care.
  • Clinicians who only occasionally look after pediatric MPS Type II patients.
  • Scientists who have not worked with MPS Type II within the last 5 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Round 1
Participants will be asked to score each outcome domain on a 9 point scale proposed by the GRADE group [http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org], in which 1 to 3 signifies an outcome of 'limited importance', 4 to 6 'important but not critical', and 7 to 9 'critical'. Round 1 will also provide participants with the opportunity to add further outcomes which they think may be important. Any suggested outcomes deemed to represent a new outcome domain by the study group (following discussion within study advisory group and a majority decision) will be added to the list for consideration in round two. Round 1 will last for approximately 2 months.
Round 2
All items (in addition to further new outcome domains identified by participants in round 1) will be carried forward for consideration in round 2. Descriptive statistics (graphs) will be used to summarize the scores from round 1 and presented to participants. Participants will see the results of their individual score for each outcome in addition to the median score of each stakeholder group. The rationale for showing participants the scores from other groups is that it may improve consensus between the stakeholder groups. In addition, by carrying all items forward from round 1, it may be possible to identify changes in scoring patterns as a result of viewing other scores. Participants will be asked to score all items once again using the 9-point scale. Round 2 will last for approximately 2 month

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
What are the most important outcomes that should be measured in trials examining ENT and respiratory disease in MPS Type II populations, aged 0-11 and 12-25 years old?
Time Frame: 8 months

Step 1. A systematic review of the literature and clinical trials registries (including the Hunter Outcome Survey) was undertaken to identify a comprehensive list of head, neck and respiratory disease outcomes reported in literature and trials of MPS Type II population. Additionally, qualitative research investigated perspectives of patients with MPS Type II.

Step 2. A Delphi survey of 3 key stakeholder groups (Patients (only for COS for the age group 12-25 years old), parents/ care givers, MPS Type II healthcare professionals), will be undertaken to try to achieve consensus about the outcomes to include in a COS.

Step 3, This will be followed by a consensus meeting of key stakeholders to ratify the COS.

8 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 28, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 24, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 1, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 1, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mucopolysaccharidosis Type II

Subscribe