Using the Subglottic Pressure to Predict the Dysphagia After Partial Laryngectomy (SPPDPL)

September 8, 2023 updated by: Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital

Department of Otolaryngology Head Neck Surg

Recruited patients are divided into two arms depending on laryngeal carcinoma's T1 and T2 stages. Two interventions were undergone, including transoral endoscopic laser cordectomy and open partial horizontal laryngectomy (OPHL). During the pre-and post-operative time, patients performed measurements of swallowing function, including direct subglottic pressure, Eating Assessment Tool-10(EAT-10) questionnaire, swallowing ability to different textures, and fiberoptic evaluation of swallowing(FEES). Patients undergo subglottic pressure measurement and swallowing function evaluation three times: 3-7 days, two months, and six months after surgery. Patients also performed measurement voice acoustic analysis and subjective assessment one-day pre-operation and six months post-operation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

There were swallowing disorders after partial laryngectomy in most patients with laryngeal carcinoma. At least these patients need several months to recover. Few people required surgery of total laryngectomy to maintain normal swallowing function. The swallowing training cannot acquire a valid swallowing function and take the risk of aspiration pneumonia. Factors that influenced the swallowing function recovery, for example, the time of nasogastric feeding and tracheostomy tube removal, were affected by age and diabetes.

On the other hand, the pharynx size of a CT scan can predict the recovery of swallowing function after laryngectomy. But those are not directly related to swallowing motion, although they are predictors of dysphagia. The investigators will perform the study with swallowing function measures to find predictors relative to swallowing function and evaluate dysphagia's recovery early.

Subglottic pressure is a protective factor that can reduce aspiration risk. This research will measure the subglottic pressure after laryngectomy and predict or monitor swallowing disorders. Specific objectives were to verify the effect of laryngectomy on subglottic pressure.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510080
        • Recruiting
        • Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age: 18-80 years
  • Surgical treatment by open partial horizontal laryngectomy type I or II and transoral laser cordectomy for squamous cell carcinoma
  • Availability of clinical data
  • Validity of normal swallowing of thin liquids

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, severe heart disease, and psychopathy or mental disease
  • Surgery complications(such as sepsis, pharyngocutaneous fistula, surgical revision)
  • Radiotherapy histology
  • Swallowing disorder or trachea aspiration before surgery.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Supraglottic and glottic T2 laryngeal carcinoma
The open partial horizontal laryngectomy was underwent in patients with supraglottic or glottic laryngeal carcinoma in T2
An open partial horizontal laryngectomy(OPHL) was performed for patients with T2 supraglottic and glottic carcinoma, according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer(AJCC) criteria. Type I OPHL: Entails the resection of the supraglottis, including the pre-epiglottic space and the upper half of the thyroid cartilage. Type II OPHL: Entails the resection of the entire thyroid cartilage, with the inferior limit represented by the upper edge of the cricoid ring. Type III OPHL: Entails the resection of the entire supraglottic, glottic, and part of the subglottic sites, sparing both or at least one functioning crico-arytenoid unit.
Other Names:
  • Type I OPHLs(formerly defined horizontal supraglottic laryngectomy), Type II (previously called supracricoid laryngectomy), and Type III (also named supratracheal laryngectomy).
Active Comparator: Supraglottic and glottic T1 laryngeal carcinoma
The transoral endoscopic laser cordectomy was underwent in patients with supraglottic or glottic laryngeal carcinoma in T1

For patients with T1 glottic laryngeal carcinoma, according to the criteria of the American Joint Committee on Cancer(AJCC), transoral endoscopic CO2 laser(2-40Watts) cordectomy was performed. The classification comprises eight types of cordectomies:

  • A subepithelial cordectomy (type I) is a resection of the epithelium of the vocal fold.
  • A subligamental cordectomy (type II) is a resection of the epithelium, Reinke's space, and vocal ligament.
  • Transmuscular cordectomy (type III), which proceeds through the vocalis muscle.
  • Total cordectomy (type IV).
  • Extended cordectomy encompasses the contralateral vocal fold and the anterior commissure (type Va).
  • Extended cordectomy, which includes the arytenoid (type Vb).
  • Extended cordectomy, which encompasses the subglottis (type Vc).
  • Extended cordectomy, which consists of the ventricle (type Vd).
Other Names:
  • Transoral carbon dioxide(CO2) laser microsurgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fiberoptic laryngoscope evaluation of swallowing
Time Frame: Pre-operation, one week post-operation, two months post-operation, six months post-operation
The patient, in a sitting position, had to swallow liquid. The tip of a flexible endoscope was positioned beyond the soft palate, and the pharyngeal phase of swallowing was studied, recording videos and images for further analysis. In particular, according to the severity scale, the scores ranged from 1 point (no materials entered the airway) to 8 points (the material penetrated below the vocal cords, but no effort was made to eject the material), representing the severity of risk for penetration
Pre-operation, one week post-operation, two months post-operation, six months post-operation
direct subglottic pressure
Time Frame: At one day before surgery, one week after surgery, two months after surgery, six months after surgery
Subglottic pressure was measured while swallowing a thinned solution with and without airflow delivery through the subglottic puncture needle. The unit of subglottic pressure is cmH20.
At one day before surgery, one week after surgery, two months after surgery, six months after surgery
EAT-10 questionnaire
Time Frame: At one day before surgery, two months after surgery, six months after surgery
The EAT-10 questionnaire consists of a 10-item questionnaire with a maximum total score of 40 points. All items are rated on a 5-point scale in which 0 indicates no problem, and 4 indicates a severe problem in swallowing function. An EAT-10 score of over 3 is abnormal and indicates a higher self-perception of the presence of dysphagia.
At one day before surgery, two months after surgery, six months after surgery
Swallowing ability to four different textures
Time Frame: At one day before surgery, one week after surgery, two months after surgery, six months after surgery
An early 5-point scoring system (score one corresponding to the early postoperative assessment) was applied to each patient depending on his ability to swallow one to four different textures (liquid, semi-liquid, semi-solid, and solid). A score of 0 is poor (no power to swallow), while a score of 4 is good.
At one day before surgery, one week after surgery, two months after surgery, six months after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Voice acoustic analysis
Time Frame: At one day before surgery, six months after surgery
Every participant was asked to phonate a sustained vowel /a/ at a habitual comfortable pitch and intensity for voice pitch, quality assessments, and habitual vocal intensity. The recordings were made in a quiet clinical room. The participant sat in front of a microphone positioned approximately 10cm from the left corner of the mouth. The voice signal coupled with Roland's Audio interface with a sampling rate of 44k-Hz and 16-bit accuracy. The signal was stored in a computer system after collecting sustained vowels. The voice signals were analyzed using speech analysis software. The stable phase of the voice sample was extracted for analysis. The 3,000-msec sample was analyzed for acoustic parameters. The voice acoustic parameters include F0 (fundamental frequency) in Hertz(Hz), percentage of jitter(%), percentage of shimmer(%), Harmonic to noise ratio(HNR), and intensity in decibels(dB).
At one day before surgery, six months after surgery
The time in weeks of nasogastric feeding
Time Frame: At two months after surgery, six months after surgery
The duration of surgery to oral feeding after withdrawing naso tube.
At two months after surgery, six months after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Xujiao Chen, Ms, Guangdong Provicial People's Hospital(Guangdong Academy of Sciences), Southern Medical University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 3, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 21, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 6, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 8, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Laryngeal Cancer

Subscribe