Gene-STEPS: Shortening Time of Evaluation in Paediatric Epilepsy Services (Gene-STEPS)

Gene-STEPS: Shortening Time of Evaluation in Paediatric Epilepsy Services: a Multi-centre Prospective Evaluation of the Impact of Early Genetic Diagnosis on Patient Outcomes

Overall, this observational cohort study aims too:

  1. Implement rapid trio WGS for all children presenting to our health systems with epilepsy onset under 12 months of age.
  2. Utilize electronic healthcare records and research databases to unite phenotypic and genomic data and to create a "virtual" registry across all institutions that will promote ongoing discovery.
  3. Assess the impact of early genetic diagnosis on epilepsy, developmental, and health economic outcomes through formal longitudinal assessments of all children enrolled.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

In the past decade, the genomic revolution has led to the identification of underlying genetic aetiologies for childhood epilepsy, in the form of monogenic disorders affecting ion channels, neurotransmitter receptors, synaptic proteins, and other families of proteins. In a growing number of cases, the specific genetic diagnosis informs prognosis and genetic counselling, leads to the opportunity to participate in natural history studies, and even to changes in treatment that, to date anecdotally, may change outcomes in seizures and in neurodevelopment. However, a major challenge in clinical practice is that early intervention requires early diagnosis.

Currently the diagnostic odyssey in early-onset epilepsy is long and arduous for patients and their families. The timing and nature of genetic testing for such patients varies widely within and across countries and institutions. Our collective expertise includes epilepsy genetics research, genomic research, clinical epilepsy, clinical trials, and team science across four leading paediatric institutions in the IPCHiP Consortium: Boston Children's Hospital (US), Great Ormond Street Hospital and UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (UK), Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne and Murdoch Children's Research Institute (Australia), and The Hospital for Sick Children ("Sick Kids", Canada). Each of our institutions has a proven track record of discovery and translation to patients, and our combined efforts in epilepsy will set a new standard for multi-institutional research, data sharing, and improvement. To investigate our hypothesis that rapid genetic diagnosis and tailored management could improve outcomes, we propose a novel approach to streamline and accelerate diagnostics in these severely affected children.

Overall, this observational cohort study aims too:

  1. Implement rapid trio WGS for all children presenting to our health systems with epilepsy onset under 12 months of age.
  2. Utilize electronic healthcare records and research databases to unite phenotypic and genomic data and to create a "virtual" registry across all institutions that will promote ongoing discovery.
  3. Assess the impact of early genetic diagnosis on epilepsy, developmental, and health economic outcomes through formal longitudinal assessments of all children enrolled.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

300

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Children with epilepsy onset under 12 months of age presenting to an epilepsy service. This is an international multi-centre collaborative study with GOSH as the UK sponsor.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Children under 12 months of age presenting with epilepsy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Simple febrile seizures.
  • Acute or remote symptomatic seizures due to sepsis, haemorrhage, cerebral infarction, hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy or non-accidental injury.
  • Structural malformations of the brain where the likely genetic cause is known such as tuberous sclerosis or lissencephaly.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of rapid genome sequencing in infantile epilepsy
Time Frame: Within three weeks of sample collection
Feasibility is measured as the turnaround for participants, from both sample collection and seizure onset to GS result.
Within three weeks of sample collection
The Diagnostic Yield of rapid genome sequencing in infantile epilepsy
Time Frame: Within three weeks of sample collection
The diagnostic yield is measured as the number of patients who receive a genetic diagnosis.
Within three weeks of sample collection
The immediate clinical utility of rapid genome sequencing in infantile epilepsy
Time Frame: Within one month of genetic result
Clinical utility is measured as actual influence on treatment, potential for precision therapy, additional investigation indicated or avoided, additional prognostic information, influence on goals of care, or influence on genetic counselling (beyond recurrence risk). These are measured using The Clinician-reported Genetic testing Utility InDEx (C-GUIDE; Hayeems et al., 2022), as well as clinical data abstracted from health care records.
Within one month of genetic result

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The impact of early genetic diagnosis on developmental outcomes - Bayley 4 - Scales of Infant and Toddler Development.
Time Frame: At Recruitment, 12 and 30 months chronological age
Bayley-4 items are scored 2 points for mastery of skill, 1 point for emerging skill and 0 points if skill is not present. Higher scores are, therefore, indicative of more advanced developmental abilities. Subtest standard scores range from 1 to 19, have a mean of 10 and a standard deviation of 3 (Bayley & Alyward, 2019).
At Recruitment, 12 and 30 months chronological age
The impact of early genetic diagnosis on developmental outcomes - Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scales, Third Edition.
Time Frame: At Recruitment, 12 and 30 months chronological age
The Vineland 3 generates five major domain composite scores: communication, daily living skills, socialisation, adaptive behaviour composite and motor skills, as well as a maladaptive score. Domain scores greater than or equal to 86 are considered adequate or above adequate. Domain scores less than or equal to 85 are considered moderately low-to-low, and indicate the patient has a significant skill deficit when compared with similarly aged peers. This is especially true for a domain score below 70. Maladaptive behavior scores up to 17 are considered average, scores of 18 to 20 are considered elevated and scores greater than 21 are considered clinically significant indicating a need for treatment intervention.
At Recruitment, 12 and 30 months chronological age
The impact of early genetic diagnosis on developmental outcomes - Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS)
Time Frame: At Recruitment, 12 and 30 months chronological age
The GMFCS is a standardised classification of functional motor abilities in children with cerebral palsy. Children are assigned a GMFCS level of 1-V according to motor functioning abilities. Level I represents the highest level of gross motor function and level V the lowest.
At Recruitment, 12 and 30 months chronological age
The impact of early genetic diagnosis on developmental outcomes - Paediatric Quality of Life Scale (PedsQL™) Infant Scales
Time Frame: At Recruitment, 12 and 30 months chronological age
The PedsQL™ Infant Scales are a generic health related quality of life instrument specifically for healthy and ill infants ages 1-24 months. The PedsQL Infant Scales encompasses 5 scales: Physical functioning, physical symptoms, emotional functioning, social functioning and cognitive functioning. The Total Scale Score is computed as the sum of all items on the PedsQL™. Items are reversed scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale, so that higher scores indicate better HRQOL.
At Recruitment, 12 and 30 months chronological age
The impact of early genetic diagnosis on developmental outcomes - Parenting Stress Index, Fourth Edition Short Form
Time Frame: At Recruitment, 12 and 30 months chronological age
The PSI-4 SF has thirty-six items are divided into three domains: Parental Distress (PD), Parent-Child Dysfunctional Interaction (P-CDI), and Difficult Child (DC), which combine to form a Total Stress scale. Percentile scoring: Between 16%-84% = Normal ranges of stress. Between 85%-89% = High levels of stress. Greater than or equal to 90% = Clinically significant.
At Recruitment, 12 and 30 months chronological age
The impact of early genetic diagnosis on epilepsy
Time Frame: 12 months and 30 months chronological age. The clinical dataset will also be retrieved at recruitment.
Clinical Dataset & Seizure diary 4 weeks prior to visit
12 months and 30 months chronological age. The clinical dataset will also be retrieved at recruitment.
The views and experiences of parents offered rapid genomic sequencing for diagnosis of their child
Time Frame: For participating parents: 3-4 weeks and then 6 months after receiving GS result. For non-participating parents: 3 months after deciding not to participate.
Qualitative interviews will be utilised to ascertain parents experiences of receiving the result, the impact of the result, and their hopes and concerns for the future. Parents who decline to participate will be asked about their decision not to take part in the study and have genome sequencing and suggestions for improving counselling and information.
For participating parents: 3-4 weeks and then 6 months after receiving GS result. For non-participating parents: 3 months after deciding not to participate.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Amy McTague, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 31, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 13, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Epilepsy

Subscribe