- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06091397
Validation of the Italian Version of the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12) in Total Ankle Replacement
July 31, 2024 updated by: Antonio Mazzotti, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Validation of the Italian Version of the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12) as a Patient-reported Outcome Measure in Total Ankle Replacement: a Study on an Italian Population
The arthritic pathology of the tibio-tarsal joint has a prevalence of approximately 1% in the general population, and its incidence has been increasing over the years.
Advanced-stage arthritis causes pain, impairs mobility, and has an extremely negative impact on patients' quality of life, resulting in significant social and economic costs.
Unlike hip and knee arthritis, ankle arthritis is often secondary to traumatic events, affecting younger patients.
An emerging treatment for severe ankle arthritis is ankle prosthetic replacement, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly used to assess patient outcomes.
The study focuses on the validity and reproducibility of the Italian versione of the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) in ankle prostheses, obtained through the translation-back-translation method, with a sample size of 120 patients.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Estimated)
120
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Antonio Mazzotti, MD PhD
- Phone Number: 0516445064
- Email: antonio.mazzotti@ior.it
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bologna, Italy, 40136
- Recruiting
- Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
-
Contact:
- Cesare Faldini, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
N/A
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
The study population consists of patients aged between 25 and 80 years, suffering from degenerative pathology of the tibio-tarsal joint, who have undergone surgical total ankle prosthetic replacement.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients of either gender, aged between 25 and 80 years;
- Patients who have undergone total ankle replacement surgery for tibio-tarsal joint pathology starting from 2018, as well as new patients on the waiting list.
- Signed informed consent for participation in the study;
- Patients who are prepared and motivated to attend the scheduled follow-up visits and complete the study questionnaires.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients unable to understand or consent;
- BMI > 40.
- Refusal to complete the study consent form.
- Substance abuse or psychological disorders that could interfere with the ability to comply with rehabilitation programs and postoperative assessments.
- Known sensitivity to device materials.
- Presence of an active or suspected latent infection in or around the affected ankle joint.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
IFJS - Italian Forgotten Join Score
Time Frame: At baseline (day 0)
|
The Italian Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) is the italian versione of the Forgotten Joint score that is a 12-question patient-reported outcomes measure created to measure a patient's awareness of their artificial joint.
Every question is scored 1 (never) to 5 (mostly) according to the selected response categories.
Thus, the raw score ranges from 12 to 60.
The raw score is linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale and then reversed to obtain the final score.
0 worst possible score, 100 best possible score
|
At baseline (day 0)
|
|
IFJS - Italian Forgotten Join Score
Time Frame: After 3 months
|
The Italian Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) is the italian versione of the Forgotten Joint score that is a 12-question patient-reported outcomes measure created to measure a patient's awareness of their artificial joint.
Every question is scored 1 (never) to 5 (mostly) according to the selected response categories.
Thus, the raw score ranges from 12 to 60.
The raw score is linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale and then reversed to obtain the final score.
0 worst possible score, 100 best possible score
|
After 3 months
|
|
IFJS - Italian Forgotten Join Score
Time Frame: After 6 months
|
The Italian Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) is the italian versione of the Forgotten Joint score that is a 12-question patient-reported outcomes measure created to measure a patient's awareness of their artificial joint.
Every question is scored 1 (never) to 5 (mostly) according to the selected response categories.
Thus, the raw score ranges from 12 to 60.
The raw score is linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale and then reversed to obtain the final score.
0 worst possible score, 100 best possible score
|
After 6 months
|
|
IFJS - Italian Forgotten Join Score
Time Frame: After 12 months
|
The Italian Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) is the italian versione of the Forgotten Joint score that is a 12-question patient-reported outcomes measure created to measure a patient's awareness of their artificial joint.
Every question is scored 1 (never) to 5 (mostly) according to the selected response categories.
Thus, the raw score ranges from 12 to 60.
The raw score is linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale and then reversed to obtain the final score.
0 worst possible score, 100 best possible score
|
After 12 months
|
|
IFJS - Italian Forgotten Join Score
Time Frame: After 24 months
|
The Italian Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) is the italian versione of the Forgotten Joint score that is a 12-question patient-reported outcomes measure created to measure a patient's awareness of their artificial joint.
Every question is scored 1 (never) to 5 (mostly) according to the selected response categories.
Thus, the raw score ranges from 12 to 60.
The raw score is linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale and then reversed to obtain the final score.
0 worst possible score, 100 best possible score
|
After 24 months
|
|
IFJS - Italian Forgotten Join Score
Time Frame: After 36 months
|
The Italian Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) is the italian versione of the Forgotten Joint score that is a 12-question patient-reported outcomes measure created to measure a patient's awareness of their artificial joint.
Every question is scored 1 (never) to 5 (mostly) according to the selected response categories.
Thus, the raw score ranges from 12 to 60.
The raw score is linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale and then reversed to obtain the final score.
0 worst possible score, 100 best possible score
|
After 36 months
|
|
IFJS - Italian Forgotten Join Score
Time Frame: After 48 months
|
The Italian Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) is the italian versione of the Forgotten Joint score that is a 12-question patient-reported outcomes measure created to measure a patient's awareness of their artificial joint.
Every question is scored 1 (never) to 5 (mostly) according to the selected response categories.
Thus, the raw score ranges from 12 to 60.
The raw score is linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale and then reversed to obtain the final score.
0 worst possible score, 100 best possible score
|
After 48 months
|
|
IFJS - Italian Forgotten Join Score
Time Frame: After 60 months
|
The Italian Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) is the italian versione of the Forgotten Joint score that is a 12-question patient-reported outcomes measure created to measure a patient's awareness of their artificial joint.
Every question is scored 1 (never) to 5 (mostly) according to the selected response categories.
Thus, the raw score ranges from 12 to 60.
The raw score is linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale and then reversed to obtain the final score.
0 worst possible score, 100 best possible score
|
After 60 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS score)
Time Frame: At baseline (day 0)
|
The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Score is a semi-objective rating scale that evaluates ankle pain, motion and alignment and ranges from 0 to 100 points.
0 worst possible score, 100 best possible score
|
At baseline (day 0)
|
|
American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS score)
Time Frame: After 3 months
|
The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Score is a semi-objective rating scale that evaluates ankle pain, motion and alignment and ranges from 0 to 100 points.
0 worst possible score, 100 best possible score
|
After 3 months
|
|
American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS score)
Time Frame: After 6 months
|
The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Score is a semi-objective rating scale that evaluates ankle pain, motion and alignment and ranges from 0 to 100 points.
0 worst possible score, 100 best possible score
|
After 6 months
|
|
American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS score)
Time Frame: After 12 months
|
The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Score is a semi-objective rating scale that evaluates ankle pain, motion and alignment and ranges from 0 to 100 points.
0 worst possible score, 100 best possible score
|
After 12 months
|
|
American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS score)
Time Frame: After 24 months
|
The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Score is a semi-objective rating scale that evaluates ankle pain, motion and alignment and ranges from 0 to 100 points.
0 worst possible score, 100 best possible score
|
After 24 months
|
|
American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS score)
Time Frame: After 36 months
|
The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Score is a semi-objective rating scale that evaluates ankle pain, motion and alignment and ranges from 0 to 100 points.
0 worst possible score, 100 best possible score
|
After 36 months
|
|
American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS score)
Time Frame: After 48 months
|
The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Score is a semi-objective rating scale that evaluates ankle pain, motion and alignment and ranges from 0 to 100 points.
0 worst possible score, 100 best possible score
|
After 48 months
|
|
American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS score)
Time Frame: After 60 months
|
The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Score is a semi-objective rating scale that evaluates ankle pain, motion and alignment and ranges from 0 to 100 points.
0 worst possible score, 100 best possible score
|
After 60 months
|
|
MOXFQ (Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire)
Time Frame: At baseline (day 0)
|
The MOXFQ is a 16-item instrument answered on a five-point Likert scale (each item is scored from 0 to 4, with 4 denoting 'most severe').
Scores for each item are summed to form three separate subscales representing underlying domains: walking/standing problems (seven items), foot pain (five items), and issues related to social interaction (four items).
Raw scale scores are then each converted to a metric from 0 to 100, where 100 denotes the most severe.
|
At baseline (day 0)
|
|
MOXFQ (Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire)
Time Frame: After 3 months
|
The MOXFQ is a 16-item instrument answered on a five-point Likert scale (each item is scored from 0 to 4, with 4 denoting 'most severe').
Scores for each item are summed to form three separate subscales representing underlying domains: walking/standing problems (seven items), foot pain (five items), and issues related to social interaction (four items).
Raw scale scores are then each converted to a metric from 0 to 100, where 100 denotes the most severe.
|
After 3 months
|
|
MOXFQ (Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire)
Time Frame: After 6 months
|
The MOXFQ is a 16-item instrument answered on a five-point Likert scale (each item is scored from 0 to 4, with 4 denoting 'most severe').
Scores for each item are summed to form three separate subscales representing underlying domains: walking/standing problems (seven items), foot pain (five items), and issues related to social interaction (four items).
Raw scale scores are then each converted to a metric from 0 to 100, where 100 denotes the most severe.
|
After 6 months
|
|
MOXFQ (Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire)
Time Frame: After 12 months
|
The MOXFQ is a 16-item instrument answered on a five-point Likert scale (each item is scored from 0 to 4, with 4 denoting 'most severe').
Scores for each item are summed to form three separate subscales representing underlying domains: walking/standing problems (seven items), foot pain (five items), and issues related to social interaction (four items).
Raw scale scores are then each converted to a metric from 0 to 100, where 100 denotes the most severe.
|
After 12 months
|
|
MOXFQ (Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire)
Time Frame: After 24 months
|
The MOXFQ is a 16-item instrument answered on a five-point Likert scale (each item is scored from 0 to 4, with 4 denoting 'most severe').
Scores for each item are summed to form three separate subscales representing underlying domains: walking/standing problems (seven items), foot pain (five items), and issues related to social interaction (four items).
Raw scale scores are then each converted to a metric from 0 to 100, where 100 denotes the most severe.
|
After 24 months
|
|
MOXFQ (Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire)
Time Frame: After 36 months
|
The MOXFQ is a 16-item instrument answered on a five-point Likert scale (each item is scored from 0 to 4, with 4 denoting 'most severe').
Scores for each item are summed to form three separate subscales representing underlying domains: walking/standing problems (seven items), foot pain (five items), and issues related to social interaction (four items).
Raw scale scores are then each converted to a metric from 0 to 100, where 100 denotes the most severe.
|
After 36 months
|
|
MOXFQ (Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire)
Time Frame: After 48 months
|
The MOXFQ is a 16-item instrument answered on a five-point Likert scale (each item is scored from 0 to 4, with 4 denoting 'most severe').
Scores for each item are summed to form three separate subscales representing underlying domains: walking/standing problems (seven items), foot pain (five items), and issues related to social interaction (four items).
Raw scale scores are then each converted to a metric from 0 to 100, where 100 denotes the most severe.
|
After 48 months
|
|
MOXFQ (Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire)
Time Frame: After 60 months
|
The MOXFQ is a 16-item instrument answered on a five-point Likert scale (each item is scored from 0 to 4, with 4 denoting 'most severe').
Scores for each item are summed to form three separate subscales representing underlying domains: walking/standing problems (seven items), foot pain (five items), and issues related to social interaction (four items).
Raw scale scores are then each converted to a metric from 0 to 100, where 100 denotes the most severe.
|
After 60 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
July 1, 2022
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2028
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 13, 2023
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 13, 2023
First Posted (Actual)
October 19, 2023
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 2, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 31, 2024
Last Verified
July 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- FORG-Score
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on PROMs
-
Medical University of ViennaRecruiting
-
Gødstrup HospitalAarhus University HospitalRecruitingPediatric Anesthesia | PROMs | Pediatric Surgery | PREMsDenmark
-
Orthosensor, Inc.CompletedPatient Engagement | Knee Arthroplasty | Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)United States
-
IASO ThessaliasNot yet recruitingPROMs | Validation Study | Postoperative Recovery | Cultural Adaptation | Quality of Recovery From AnaesthesiaGreece
-
Assiut UniversityAO TraumaNot yet recruitingAcetabular Fracture | PROMs | Mobile Phone Use
-
Helsinki University Central HospitalRecruitingCultural Adaptation of Shoulder and Elbow PROMs | Definition of the Patients Acceptable Symptomatic State | Definition of the Minimal Important DifferenceFinland
-
Carelon ResearchNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)RecruitingResilience, Psychological | Pragmatic Trial | Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) | Telemedicine-Based Education | Adolescent Congenital Heart Disease | Resiliency-building InterventionUnited States
-
Istituto Ortopedico RizzoliCompletedPROMs | Knee Ligament Injury | PCL - Posterior Cruciate Ligament RuptureItaly
-
Carilion ClinicNational Institutes of Health (NIH); Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State... and other collaboratorsCompletedMental Health Disorder | Telemedicine | PROMs | Waitlist | Psychiatric or Mood Diseases or ConditionsUnited States
-
I.R.C.C.S Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'AmbrogioNot yet recruitingPROMs | ACL Injury | Scale Reliability Validity | Validation and Cultural Adaptation of a ScaleItaly