- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06522659
Evaluation of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Surgically Treated Multiligamentous Knee Injuries (MULTI-LIG)
Multiligament knee injuries are typically caused by high-energy mechanisms and are classified according to the number of ligaments involved using Schenk's classification (Knee Dislocation) into KD 1, KD 2, KD 3, and KD 4. These types of injuries can have devastating consequences on the individual's quality of life, affecting their ability to return to sports and perform daily activities.
In the literature, there is still no consensus on the management of these types of traumas, both due to the wide range of situations that can present to the orthopedic surgeon and the difficulty in their diagnostic and therapeutic framing. The main controversies concern the conservative or surgical management of the injuries and the timing of when to undertake surgical treatment, if at all.
The instability resulting from multiligament knee injuries is poorly tolerated by patients, who find their daily activities limited. It is also well known that this instability can dramatically accelerate the development of osteoarthritis, leading to the need for joint replacement surgery even in young individuals, thus increasing the likelihood of revisions and re-operations over time.
Due to the lack of standardized and satisfactory treatment, the economic cost of the outcomes of multiligament knee injuries is particularly high. A recent study by XXX showed that only XXX% of individuals are able to return to work. The rate of participation in sports is even lower, which has a long-term potential impact by increasing the risk of sedentary lifestyle-related diseases such as obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases.
The choice of surgical treatment aims to eliminate the patient's subjective feeling of instability and to repair, when possible, or reconstruct the injured ligament structures to reduce the risk of secondary osteoarthritis. Available studies in the literature are often case reports presenting short- and medium-term results of non-standardized surgical techniques with great heterogeneity in rehabilitation protocols, so the real long-term effectiveness of these treatments in terms of joint stability and osteoarthritis prevention is not known.
Study Overview
Status
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bologna, Italy, 40136
- IRRCS Rizzoli Ortopedic Institute
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged between 18 and 65 years at the time of surgery
- Male and female gender
- Patients undergoing multiligamentous knee reconstruction from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2019, at the Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients no longer reachable;
- Patients who do not consent to be included in the study;
- Pregnant women;
- Presence of infection or hematologic, rheumatic, or coagulative disorders at the time of evaluation.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC)
Time Frame: 5 years
|
The IKDC form assesses knee function and symptoms across three domains: Symptoms (pain, stiffness, swelling, locking), Sports and daily activities, and Current knee function compared to before injury.
It includes 10 questions: seven on symptoms, one on sports, one on daily activity difficulties, and one on current knee function.
Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better knee function (excellent: 80-100, good: 60-80, fair: 30-60, poor: 0-30).
|
5 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Lysholm Knee Score
Time Frame: 5 years
|
It is a validated measurement scale that assesses knee functionality through 8 items that determine the condition of the knee in response to the functional demands of daily life activities. This evaluation form is used to assess the surgical outcomes in patients who have undergone surgery for ligament or meniscal injuries of the knee. The final score is obtained by summing the various scores from the different items, ranging from 0 to 100. Scores are divided into subgroups: Excellent (95-100), Good (84-94), Fair (65-83), and Poor (<64). |
5 years
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 5 years
|
It is a one-dimensional quantitative numerical scale for assessing pain on a 10-point scale.
The scale requires the patient to select the number that best describes the intensity of their pain, from 0 to 10, at that specific moment.
0 means no pain, and 10 indicates the worst possible pain.
|
5 years
|
|
SF-36 (Short Form-36 Health Survey)
Time Frame: 5 years
|
The SF-36 is the most well-known and widely used health-related quality of life measurement tool in international literature.
It measures different health concepts through 36 multiple-choice questions.
The data are aggregated into 8 scales that investigate: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health.
Additionally, there is one question regarding changes in health status over the past year.
|
5 years
|
|
Tegner Score
Time Frame: 5 years
|
The Tegner Score estimates the level of physical activity of an individual with a score ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents 'disability' and 10 represents 'participation in competitive sports, such as national or international level soccer.'
This score is the most commonly used to define the activity level of patients with knee disorders.
In the study, the Tegner Score will be completed directly by the investigator through an interview with the patient.
|
5 years
|
|
Time taken to return to work
Time Frame: 5 years
|
The ability to return to work following the trauma will be assessed with a questionnaire, including the capacity to perform the same job duties.
|
5 years
|
|
Clinical evaluation
Time Frame: 5 years
|
The stability of the operated knee will be globally assessed using routine knee evaluation tests.
|
5 years
|
|
Radiographic assessment
Time Frame: 5 years
|
Clinical and imaging data will be collected from patients to assess osteoarthritis development and severity, along with any other radiographic abnormalities.
If recent radiological records are not available as per study protocol in the last 12 months, a weight-bearing X-ray of the lower limbs (panoramic and lateral views of the operated knee) will be conducted.
This aims to classify osteoarthritis severity using the Kellgren-Lawrence scale, which grades knee osteoarthritis from 0 (no visible changes) to 4 (severe joint space narrowing, bone sclerosis, and osteophyte formation).
|
5 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- MULTI-LIG
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on PROMs
-
Medical University of ViennaRecruiting
-
Gødstrup HospitalAarhus University HospitalRecruitingPediatric Anesthesia | PROMs | Pediatric Surgery | PREMsDenmark
-
Istituto Ortopedico RizzoliRecruitingPROMs | Total Ankle Replacement | Italian Forgotten Joint ScoreItaly
-
Orthosensor, Inc.CompletedPatient Engagement | Knee Arthroplasty | Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)United States
-
IASO ThessaliasNot yet recruitingPROMs | Validation Study | Postoperative Recovery | Cultural Adaptation | Quality of Recovery From AnaesthesiaGreece
-
Assiut UniversityAO TraumaNot yet recruitingAcetabular Fracture | PROMs | Mobile Phone Use
-
Helsinki University Central HospitalRecruitingCultural Adaptation of Shoulder and Elbow PROMs | Definition of the Patients Acceptable Symptomatic State | Definition of the Minimal Important DifferenceFinland
-
Carelon ResearchNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)RecruitingResilience, Psychological | Pragmatic Trial | Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) | Telemedicine-Based Education | Adolescent Congenital Heart Disease | Resiliency-building InterventionUnited States
-
Carilion ClinicNational Institutes of Health (NIH); Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State... and other collaboratorsCompletedMental Health Disorder | Telemedicine | PROMs | Waitlist | Psychiatric or Mood Diseases or ConditionsUnited States
-
I.R.C.C.S Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'AmbrogioNot yet recruitingPROMs | ACL Injury | Scale Reliability Validity | Validation and Cultural Adaptation of a ScaleItaly