Evaluation of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Surgically Treated Multiligamentous Knee Injuries (MULTI-LIG)

March 24, 2026 updated by: Stefano Zaffagnini, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

Multiligament knee injuries are typically caused by high-energy mechanisms and are classified according to the number of ligaments involved using Schenk's classification (Knee Dislocation) into KD 1, KD 2, KD 3, and KD 4. These types of injuries can have devastating consequences on the individual's quality of life, affecting their ability to return to sports and perform daily activities.

In the literature, there is still no consensus on the management of these types of traumas, both due to the wide range of situations that can present to the orthopedic surgeon and the difficulty in their diagnostic and therapeutic framing. The main controversies concern the conservative or surgical management of the injuries and the timing of when to undertake surgical treatment, if at all.

The instability resulting from multiligament knee injuries is poorly tolerated by patients, who find their daily activities limited. It is also well known that this instability can dramatically accelerate the development of osteoarthritis, leading to the need for joint replacement surgery even in young individuals, thus increasing the likelihood of revisions and re-operations over time.

Due to the lack of standardized and satisfactory treatment, the economic cost of the outcomes of multiligament knee injuries is particularly high. A recent study by XXX showed that only XXX% of individuals are able to return to work. The rate of participation in sports is even lower, which has a long-term potential impact by increasing the risk of sedentary lifestyle-related diseases such as obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases.

The choice of surgical treatment aims to eliminate the patient's subjective feeling of instability and to repair, when possible, or reconstruct the injured ligament structures to reduce the risk of secondary osteoarthritis. Available studies in the literature are often case reports presenting short- and medium-term results of non-standardized surgical techniques with great heterogeneity in rehabilitation protocols, so the real long-term effectiveness of these treatments in terms of joint stability and osteoarthritis prevention is not known.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

42

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bologna, Italy, 40136
        • IRRCS Rizzoli Ortopedic Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients will be recruited from all subjects treated surgically with multiligament knee reconstruction techniques from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2019, at the Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients aged between 18 and 65 years at the time of surgery
  2. Male and female gender
  3. Patients undergoing multiligamentous knee reconstruction from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2019, at the Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients no longer reachable;
  2. Patients who do not consent to be included in the study;
  3. Pregnant women;
  4. Presence of infection or hematologic, rheumatic, or coagulative disorders at the time of evaluation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC)
Time Frame: 5 years
The IKDC form assesses knee function and symptoms across three domains: Symptoms (pain, stiffness, swelling, locking), Sports and daily activities, and Current knee function compared to before injury. It includes 10 questions: seven on symptoms, one on sports, one on daily activity difficulties, and one on current knee function. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better knee function (excellent: 80-100, good: 60-80, fair: 30-60, poor: 0-30).
5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lysholm Knee Score
Time Frame: 5 years

It is a validated measurement scale that assesses knee functionality through 8 items that determine the condition of the knee in response to the functional demands of daily life activities. This evaluation form is used to assess the surgical outcomes in patients who have undergone surgery for ligament or meniscal injuries of the knee.

The final score is obtained by summing the various scores from the different items, ranging from 0 to 100. Scores are divided into subgroups: Excellent (95-100), Good (84-94), Fair (65-83), and Poor (<64).

5 years

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 5 years
It is a one-dimensional quantitative numerical scale for assessing pain on a 10-point scale. The scale requires the patient to select the number that best describes the intensity of their pain, from 0 to 10, at that specific moment. 0 means no pain, and 10 indicates the worst possible pain.
5 years
SF-36 (Short Form-36 Health Survey)
Time Frame: 5 years
The SF-36 is the most well-known and widely used health-related quality of life measurement tool in international literature. It measures different health concepts through 36 multiple-choice questions. The data are aggregated into 8 scales that investigate: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Additionally, there is one question regarding changes in health status over the past year.
5 years
Tegner Score
Time Frame: 5 years
The Tegner Score estimates the level of physical activity of an individual with a score ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents 'disability' and 10 represents 'participation in competitive sports, such as national or international level soccer.' This score is the most commonly used to define the activity level of patients with knee disorders. In the study, the Tegner Score will be completed directly by the investigator through an interview with the patient.
5 years
Time taken to return to work
Time Frame: 5 years
The ability to return to work following the trauma will be assessed with a questionnaire, including the capacity to perform the same job duties.
5 years
Clinical evaluation
Time Frame: 5 years
The stability of the operated knee will be globally assessed using routine knee evaluation tests.
5 years
Radiographic assessment
Time Frame: 5 years
Clinical and imaging data will be collected from patients to assess osteoarthritis development and severity, along with any other radiographic abnormalities. If recent radiological records are not available as per study protocol in the last 12 months, a weight-bearing X-ray of the lower limbs (panoramic and lateral views of the operated knee) will be conducted. This aims to classify osteoarthritis severity using the Kellgren-Lawrence scale, which grades knee osteoarthritis from 0 (no visible changes) to 4 (severe joint space narrowing, bone sclerosis, and osteophyte formation).
5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 31, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 2, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

March 2, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 11, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MULTI-LIG

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on PROMs

Subscribe