The Utility of Mobile Based Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Patients With Acetabular Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

May 17, 2020 updated by: Mohammed Kamal Abdelnasser, Assiut University

The Utility of Mobile Based Patient Reported Outcome Measures(PROMS) in Patients With Acetabular Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Acetabular fractures are articular fractures involving the hip joint that needs anatomical reduction and a strict long follow up after fixation.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The percentage of patients with lost follow up is significantly high. Previously all other studies mainly focused on the radiographic outcome after acetabular fractures and rarely on patient reported functional outcomes and quality of life. The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is increasing and may lead to modifications of treatment. Recent technologic advances, namely smartphones, capable of measuring outcomes after acetabular fractures are now very important in quantifying value-based care. This was previously accomplished through office assessments and surveys with variable follow-up but this strategy lacks continuous and complete data. Studies show that these remote modes of follow-up are safe and that patients are as equally satisfied with them as they are with in-person follow- up care

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

138

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • all patients older than 18 years old who will have surgery for an acetabular fracture at assiut university hospitals from 1/10/2020 to 30/9/2022.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients younger than 18 years.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: conventional follow up patients
telemedicine is used to overcome distance when patients must travel to receive specialized care. We depend on the available, widely used smartphones via a mobile application to conduct follow up data as regard to patient quality of life and comparing this to conventional follow up visits and whether it help to obtain a complete follow up data
Experimental: Mobile app follow up patients
telemedicine is used to overcome distance when patients must travel to receive specialized care. We depend on the available, widely used smartphones via a mobile application to conduct follow up data as regard to patient quality of life and comparing this to conventional follow up visits and whether it help to obtain a complete follow up data

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the percentage of missed follow up data in both groups at 12 months postoperatively
Time Frame: at least one year follow up
through assessing the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) after surgery for a fracture of the acetabulum in assiut university hospital using the Arabic validated form of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36).
at least one year follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the ability of the mobile application to rapidly detect the occurrence of serious postoperative complication.
Time Frame: at least one year follow up
to record the ability of the mobile application to rapidly detect the occurrence of serious postoperative complication as infection and DVT and notify us by this complication by means of the Red Flag signs which will be added to the application.
at least one year follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

October 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 19, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 19, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • TUOMBPROMSIPWAFARCT

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acetabular Fracture

Clinical Trials on Mobile application

3
Subscribe