Comparison of a Lithotripsy vs Standard Preparation Followed by Stenting With Supera Stent in Femoropopliteal Lesions (CRACK-IT)

April 30, 2026 updated by: University of Leipzig

Performance of the Shockwave Medical Peripheral Lithotripsy System vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for Lesion Preparation Prior to Supera Stent Implantation in the Treatment of Symptomatic Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions in PAD

This study is an investigator-initiated, prospective, single-center, 1:1 randomized pilot study.

The trial evaluates the safety and efficacy of intravascular lithotripsy in comparison to standard lesion preparation using standard and/or high-pressure balloon angioplasty in patients with femoropopliteal artery disease. All patients will receive subsequent Supera stent implantation at the operator's discretion. Additional standard nitinol bare metal stent (BMS), drug-eluting stent or covered stent implantation is at the operator's discretion.

Patients will be stratified for total occlusions.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

All enrolled subjects will be followed up through 60 months. At 6, 12, 24, 36 MFU after index procedure the incidence of restenosis will be assessed by DUS.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Saxony
      • Leipzig, Saxony, Germany, 04103
        • Recruiting
        • University Clinic Leipzig
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Dierk Scheinert, Prof. Dr.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Andrej Schmidt, PD Dr.
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sabine Steiner, Prof. Dr.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject age ≥ 18
  • Subject has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to participate, and has signed a Medical Ethics Committee approved inform consent form
  • Subject understands the duration of the study, agrees to attend follow-up visits, and agrees to complete the required testing
  • Rutherford Classification 2-5
  • Subject has a de novo or restenotic lesion in SFA and/or PPA not exceeding the medial femoral epicondyle with ≥ 70% stenosis documented angiographically
  • No previous stent in the target lesion, if target vessel was previously stented the stent should be at least 3cm apart
  • Target lesion length is ≥ 10cm, no maximum lesion length limit
  • Severe calcification on fluoroscopy defined by PACSS Grade 4: 1) bilateral calcification and 2) extending ≥50mm in length
  • Multiple lesions with max. 3cm healthy vessel segment in between lesions can be considered at the discretion of the operator as one lesion
  • Reference vessel diameter (RVD) ≥ 4 mm and ≤ 6.5 mm by visual estimation
  • Patency of at least one infrapopliteal artery to the ankle (< 50% diameter stenosis) in continuity with the native femoropopliteal artery
  • A guidewire has successfully traversed the target treatment segment (both intraluminal and subintimal crossing allowed)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Failure to successfully cross the target lesion
  • Presence of fresh thrombus in the lesion
  • Presence of aneurysm in the target vessel/s
  • Presence of a stent in the target lesion, at least 3cm from any previously stent in target vessel
  • Prior vascular surgery of the target lesion
  • Stroke or heart attack within 3 months prior to enrollment
  • Enrolled in another investigational drug, device or biologic study that has not reached the primary endpoint
  • Life expectancy of less than one year
  • Known allergies or sensitivity to heparin, aspirin, other anticoagulant/ antiplatelet therapies or contrast media that cannot be adequately pre-treated prior to index procedure
  • Rutherford Classification of 0, 1, or 6
  • Significant gastrointestinal bleeding or any coagulopathy that would contraindicate the use of anti-platelet therapy
  • Receiving immunosuppressant therapy
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding females
  • History of major amputation (defined as amputation above ankle joint) in the same limb as the target lesion

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Intravascular lithotripsy arm
Treatment with Lithotripsy system followed by Supera stent implantation in lesion segments with severe calcification.
Lesion preparation with Shockwave Medical Peripheral Lithotripsy System
Other: Standard lesion preparation arm
Treatment with Balloon angioplasty with a conventional and/or high-pressure balloon angioplasty followed by Supera stent implantation in lesion segments with severe calcification.
Lesion preparation with Standard and/or High-Pressure Balloon Angioplasty

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary efficacy
Time Frame: During the Procedure
Procedural success defined as residual stenosis ≤ 30% without flow-limiting dissection (≥Grade D) in the final angiogram and without the need of additional stent implantation.
During the Procedure
Rate of primary outcome events
Time Frame: 12 month
Composite endpoint defined as freedom from device and procedure-related death, freedom from both target limb major amputation and clinically-driven target lesion revascularization
12 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of vessel rupture
Time Frame: During the Procedure
Rate of vessel rupture
During the Procedure
Need of additional stent implantation
Time Frame: During the Procedure
Need of additional stent implantation
During the Procedure
Procedure Time (min)
Time Frame: During the Procedure
Procedure Time (min)
During the Procedure
Fluoroscopy Duration (min)
Time Frame: During the Procedure
Fluoroscopy Duration (min)
During the Procedure
Radiation dose area product
Time Frame: During the Procedure
Radiation dose area product
During the Procedure
Additional need of intra-procedural pain medication
Time Frame: During the Procedure
Additional need of intra-procedural pain medication
During the Procedure
Perception of procedural pain evaluated using a numerical rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (severest pain)
Time Frame: During the Procedure
Perception of procedural pain evaluated using a numerical rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (severest pain)
During the Procedure
Rate of any dissections after lesion preparation and in the final angiogram
Time Frame: During the Procedure
Rate of any dissections after lesion preparation and in the final angiogram
During the Procedure
Rate of primary patency
Time Frame: 6, 12, 24 and 36 months
Rate of primary patency
6, 12, 24 and 36 months
Rate of Duplex-defined binary restenosis (PVR >2.4) of the target lesion
Time Frame: post-procedure until discharge from hospital (up to 48 hours) and at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months or at any time of re-intervention
Rate of Duplex-defined binary restenosis (PVR >2.4) of the target lesion
post-procedure until discharge from hospital (up to 48 hours) and at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months or at any time of re-intervention
Rate of Clinically-driven Target lesion revascularization
Time Frame: 30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Rate of Clinically-driven Target lesion revascularization
30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Rate of Freedom from Major Adverse Event (defined as death, Target lesion revascularization, Target vessel revascularization and target limb major amputation)
Time Frame: 30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Rate of Freedom from Major Adverse Event (defined as death, Target lesion revascularization, Target vessel revascularization and target limb major amputation)
30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Rate of All-cause mortality
Time Frame: 30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Rate of All-cause mortality
30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Ankle-brachial index (ABI)
Time Frame: 6, 12, 24 and 36 months

The ABI is calculated by dividing the highest of the dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial pressures in each leg by the highest of the brachial pressures.

Value less than 0.90 indicates a diagnosis of PAD.

6, 12, 24 and 36 months
Rutherford Classification
Time Frame: 6, 12, 24 and 36 months
Rutherford Classification Scale from 0=Asymptomatic, 1=Mild claudication, 2=Moderate claudication, 3=Severe claudication, 4=Ischemic rest pain, 5=Minor tissue loss up to worst classification 6=Major tissue loss
6, 12, 24 and 36 months
Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ)
Time Frame: 6, 12, 24 and 36 months
The products are summed and divided by the maximum possible score to obtain a percent score, ranging from 0 (representing the inability to perform any of the tasks) to 100 (representing no difficult with any of the tasks).
6, 12, 24 and 36 months
EQ-5D-5L questionnaire
Time Frame: 6, 12, 24 and 36 months
The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: o problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems.
6, 12, 24 and 36 months
EQ VAS
Time Frame: 6, 12, 24 and 36 months
The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 100% 'Best imaginable health state' and 0% 'Worst imaginable health state'.
6, 12, 24 and 36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sabine Steiner, Prof. Dr., University Leipzig

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 13, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2032

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 19, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 1, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peripheral Arterial Disease

Clinical Trials on Intravascular lithotripsy

Subscribe