- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06112171
Comparison of a Lithotripsy vs Standard Preparation Followed by Stenting With Supera Stent in Femoropopliteal Lesions (CRACK-IT)
Performance of the Shockwave Medical Peripheral Lithotripsy System vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for Lesion Preparation Prior to Supera Stent Implantation in the Treatment of Symptomatic Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions in PAD
This study is an investigator-initiated, prospective, single-center, 1:1 randomized pilot study.
The trial evaluates the safety and efficacy of intravascular lithotripsy in comparison to standard lesion preparation using standard and/or high-pressure balloon angioplasty in patients with femoropopliteal artery disease. All patients will receive subsequent Supera stent implantation at the operator's discretion. Additional standard nitinol bare metal stent (BMS), drug-eluting stent or covered stent implantation is at the operator's discretion.
Patients will be stratified for total occlusions.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Sabine Steiner, Prof. Dr.
- Phone Number: 18770 +49-341-97
- Email: Sabine.Steiner@medizin.uni-leipzig.de
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Janine Brunotte
- Phone Number: 18770 +49-341-97
- Email: janine.brunotte@medizin.uni-leipzig.de
Study Locations
-
-
Saxony
-
Leipzig, Saxony, Germany, 04103
- Recruiting
- University Clinic Leipzig
-
Contact:
- Janin Lenzer
- Phone Number: 18774 +49-341-97
- Email: janin.lenzer@medizin.uni-leipzig.de
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Dierk Scheinert, Prof. Dr.
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Andrej Schmidt, PD Dr.
-
Principal Investigator:
- Sabine Steiner, Prof. Dr.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subject age ≥ 18
- Subject has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to participate, and has signed a Medical Ethics Committee approved inform consent form
- Subject understands the duration of the study, agrees to attend follow-up visits, and agrees to complete the required testing
- Rutherford Classification 2-5
- Subject has a de novo or restenotic lesion in SFA and/or PPA not exceeding the medial femoral epicondyle with ≥ 70% stenosis documented angiographically
- No previous stent in the target lesion, if target vessel was previously stented the stent should be at least 3cm apart
- Target lesion length is ≥ 10cm, no maximum lesion length limit
- Severe calcification on fluoroscopy defined by PACSS Grade 4: 1) bilateral calcification and 2) extending ≥50mm in length
- Multiple lesions with max. 3cm healthy vessel segment in between lesions can be considered at the discretion of the operator as one lesion
- Reference vessel diameter (RVD) ≥ 4 mm and ≤ 6.5 mm by visual estimation
- Patency of at least one infrapopliteal artery to the ankle (< 50% diameter stenosis) in continuity with the native femoropopliteal artery
- A guidewire has successfully traversed the target treatment segment (both intraluminal and subintimal crossing allowed)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Failure to successfully cross the target lesion
- Presence of fresh thrombus in the lesion
- Presence of aneurysm in the target vessel/s
- Presence of a stent in the target lesion, at least 3cm from any previously stent in target vessel
- Prior vascular surgery of the target lesion
- Stroke or heart attack within 3 months prior to enrollment
- Enrolled in another investigational drug, device or biologic study that has not reached the primary endpoint
- Life expectancy of less than one year
- Known allergies or sensitivity to heparin, aspirin, other anticoagulant/ antiplatelet therapies or contrast media that cannot be adequately pre-treated prior to index procedure
- Rutherford Classification of 0, 1, or 6
- Significant gastrointestinal bleeding or any coagulopathy that would contraindicate the use of anti-platelet therapy
- Receiving immunosuppressant therapy
- Pregnant or breast-feeding females
- History of major amputation (defined as amputation above ankle joint) in the same limb as the target lesion
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: Intravascular lithotripsy arm
Treatment with Lithotripsy system followed by Supera stent implantation in lesion segments with severe calcification.
|
Lesion preparation with Shockwave Medical Peripheral Lithotripsy System
|
|
Other: Standard lesion preparation arm
Treatment with Balloon angioplasty with a conventional and/or high-pressure balloon angioplasty followed by Supera stent implantation in lesion segments with severe calcification.
|
Lesion preparation with Standard and/or High-Pressure Balloon Angioplasty
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Primary efficacy
Time Frame: During the Procedure
|
Procedural success defined as residual stenosis ≤ 30% without flow-limiting dissection (≥Grade D) in the final angiogram and without the need of additional stent implantation.
|
During the Procedure
|
|
Rate of primary outcome events
Time Frame: 12 month
|
Composite endpoint defined as freedom from device and procedure-related death, freedom from both target limb major amputation and clinically-driven target lesion revascularization
|
12 month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of vessel rupture
Time Frame: During the Procedure
|
Rate of vessel rupture
|
During the Procedure
|
|
Need of additional stent implantation
Time Frame: During the Procedure
|
Need of additional stent implantation
|
During the Procedure
|
|
Procedure Time (min)
Time Frame: During the Procedure
|
Procedure Time (min)
|
During the Procedure
|
|
Fluoroscopy Duration (min)
Time Frame: During the Procedure
|
Fluoroscopy Duration (min)
|
During the Procedure
|
|
Radiation dose area product
Time Frame: During the Procedure
|
Radiation dose area product
|
During the Procedure
|
|
Additional need of intra-procedural pain medication
Time Frame: During the Procedure
|
Additional need of intra-procedural pain medication
|
During the Procedure
|
|
Perception of procedural pain evaluated using a numerical rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (severest pain)
Time Frame: During the Procedure
|
Perception of procedural pain evaluated using a numerical rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (severest pain)
|
During the Procedure
|
|
Rate of any dissections after lesion preparation and in the final angiogram
Time Frame: During the Procedure
|
Rate of any dissections after lesion preparation and in the final angiogram
|
During the Procedure
|
|
Rate of primary patency
Time Frame: 6, 12, 24 and 36 months
|
Rate of primary patency
|
6, 12, 24 and 36 months
|
|
Rate of Duplex-defined binary restenosis (PVR >2.4) of the target lesion
Time Frame: post-procedure until discharge from hospital (up to 48 hours) and at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months or at any time of re-intervention
|
Rate of Duplex-defined binary restenosis (PVR >2.4) of the target lesion
|
post-procedure until discharge from hospital (up to 48 hours) and at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months or at any time of re-intervention
|
|
Rate of Clinically-driven Target lesion revascularization
Time Frame: 30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
Rate of Clinically-driven Target lesion revascularization
|
30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
|
Rate of Freedom from Major Adverse Event (defined as death, Target lesion revascularization, Target vessel revascularization and target limb major amputation)
Time Frame: 30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
Rate of Freedom from Major Adverse Event (defined as death, Target lesion revascularization, Target vessel revascularization and target limb major amputation)
|
30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
|
Rate of All-cause mortality
Time Frame: 30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
Rate of All-cause mortality
|
30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
|
Ankle-brachial index (ABI)
Time Frame: 6, 12, 24 and 36 months
|
The ABI is calculated by dividing the highest of the dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial pressures in each leg by the highest of the brachial pressures. Value less than 0.90 indicates a diagnosis of PAD. |
6, 12, 24 and 36 months
|
|
Rutherford Classification
Time Frame: 6, 12, 24 and 36 months
|
Rutherford Classification Scale from 0=Asymptomatic, 1=Mild claudication, 2=Moderate claudication, 3=Severe claudication, 4=Ischemic rest pain, 5=Minor tissue loss up to worst classification 6=Major tissue loss
|
6, 12, 24 and 36 months
|
|
Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ)
Time Frame: 6, 12, 24 and 36 months
|
The products are summed and divided by the maximum possible score to obtain a percent score, ranging from 0 (representing the inability to perform any of the tasks) to 100 (representing no difficult with any of the tasks).
|
6, 12, 24 and 36 months
|
|
EQ-5D-5L questionnaire
Time Frame: 6, 12, 24 and 36 months
|
The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.
Each dimension has 5 levels: o problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems.
|
6, 12, 24 and 36 months
|
|
EQ VAS
Time Frame: 6, 12, 24 and 36 months
|
The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 100% 'Best imaginable health state' and 0% 'Worst imaginable health state'.
|
6, 12, 24 and 36 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sabine Steiner, Prof. Dr., University Leipzig
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CIP_23/001
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Peripheral Arterial Disease
-
University of NebraskaRecruitingPeripheral Arterial Disease | Peripheral Vascular Diseases | Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease | Peripheral Artery DiseaseUnited States
-
Marissa JarosinskiTerminatedPeripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease | Peripheral Vascular Disease | Peripheral Artery Disease | Clopidogrel, Poor Metabolism of | Artery DiseaseUnited States
-
OrbusNeichEucatech AG; Centre Européen de Recherche CardiovasculaireRecruitingPeripheral Arterial Disease | Peripheral Arterial Occlusive DiseaseSpain, Singapore, Belgium, Germany
-
CID S.p.A.Meditrial Europe Ltd.Not yet recruitingPeripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease | Peripheral Artery DiseaseItaly
-
Wroclaw Medical UniversityPoznan University of Medical Sciences; Military Institute of Medicine National...RecruitingPeripheral Arterial Disease(PAD)Poland
-
BayerCompleted
-
University of NebraskaRecruitingPeripheral Arterial Disease | Peripheral Vascular Disease | Peripheral Artery Disease | Peripheral Artery Occlusive DiseaseUnited States
-
Stanford UniversityTerminatedPAD - Peripheral Arterial Disease | PVD- Peripheral Vascular DiseaseUnited States
-
Vascuros Medical Pte LtdNovella ClinicalUnknownPeripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease | Peripheral Vascular Disease | Peripheral Artery DiseaseSingapore, Belgium, Germany
-
Western Vascular Institute, IrelandRecruitingPeripheral Arterial Occlusive DiseaseIreland
Clinical Trials on Intravascular lithotripsy
-
Shockwave Medical, Inc.Massachusetts General Hospital; Yale University; IQVIA Pty LtdActive, not recruitingPeripheral Arterial DiseaseJapan
-
Shockwave Medical, Inc.Massachusetts General Hospital; Medpace, Inc.; Yale Cardiovascular Research Group and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingCarotid Artery Diseases | Carotid Artery Calcification
-
Shockwave Medical, Inc.Massachusetts General Hospital; Medpace, Inc.; Yale Cardiovascular Research Group and other collaboratorsNot yet recruiting
-
Medical Care Center Prof. Mathey, Prof. Schofer...Shockwave Medical, Inc.; Asklepios proresearchNot yet recruitingCoronary Artery Disease | Calcification
-
Shockwave Medical, Inc.CompletedPeripheral Artery DiseaseUnited States, Germany
-
Shockwave Medical, Inc.CompletedPeripheral Arterial DiseaseUnited States
-
Shockwave Medical, Inc.Recruiting
-
Baim Institute for Clinical ResearchC. Michael Gibson, MS, MD; Akiko Maehara, MD; Robert W. Yeh, MD; Ajay Kirtane, MD; Kathleen Kearney,... and other collaboratorsCompletedTreatment in Calcified Coronary DiseaseUnited States
-
Spectrumedics Medical Technology(Shanghai)Co.,LtdNot yet recruiting
-
University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandRecruitingCoronary Artery Disease | Restenosis | Coronary Angioplasty | Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) | Angioplasty, Transluminal, Percutaneous Coronary | Coronary Stent Restenosis | Intravascular Lithotripsy; Rotational Atherectomy; OFDI | Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) | Percutaneous Coronary Intervention... and other conditionsFrance