Physiological and Environmental Data in a Remote Setting to Predict Exacerbation Events in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (SENSOR)

The study plans to monitor around 300 people from different hospitals with COPD for a period of 3 months after they are discharged from the hospital using a smartphone app and a Fitbit device. This device can passively track certain health metrics; this way the research team can research whether it is possible to identify the early warning signs of a decline in health by using these ongoing measurements of vital signs and symptoms. This could allow doctors to intervene early and potentially prevent further deterioration in health decline and hospital admission altogether.

The study seeks to investigate how similar these physiological measurements are when collected in the real world rather than just in the hospital setting, and what influence environmental factors have on a patient's health and experience of their condition.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

300

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

COPD patients admitted in hospital

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18 or over.
  • Diagnosis of COPD, currently admitted to hospital and clinically stable with a confirmed acute exacerbation of COPD.
  • Ownership of a smartphone (iOS version 13 or above, Android version 8 or above).
  • Able to provide informed consent to participate in study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who require less than 24 hours in hospital at initial visit.
  • Patients deemed unlikely to cooperate with study requirements.
  • Patients with implantable devices.
  • Patient not felt to be suitable for research enrolment by admitting clinical team.
  • Patients requiring non-invasive ventilation or deemed to have a life-expectancy of less than 90 days following discharge.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To assess the volume and quality of the data collected in terms of:
Time Frame: 3 months
Total number of subjects: number of subjects who completed the on boarding stage of the study
3 months
To assess the volume and quality of the data collected in terms of:
Time Frame: 3 months
Dropout rate: proportion of subjects who dropped out (withdrew from study or stopped using the app/connected device prior to the off-boarding process or had to exit the trial due to deterioration)
3 months
To assess the volume and quality of the data collected in terms of:
Time Frame: 3 months
Median time to dropout, where time to dropout is the number of days between subject's enrolment date and drop-out date (either date of withdrawal/exit from the study or date when subject stopped using the app and connected device entirely)
3 months
To assess the volume and quality of the data collected in terms of:
Time Frame: 3 months
Number of participants who provided passive measurements for minimum of 50% of the study period
3 months
To assess the volume and quality of the data collected in terms of:
Time Frame: 3 months
Number of participants who provided minimum of 33% of measures requiring active input from user
3 months
To assess the volume and quality of the data collected in terms of:
Time Frame: 3 months
Data completeness: proportion of missing and total number of data points
3 months
To assess the volume and quality of the data collected in terms of:
Time Frame: 3 months
Data consistency across sources: where similar information is recorded in multiple modules (e.g., breathlessness scale and symptom tracker), proportion of records in which consistent answers were provided will be reported
3 months
To assess the volume and quality of the data collected in terms of:
Time Frame: 3 months
Proportion of data within admissible value range, where admissible value range will be determined based on literature or clinical guidance
3 months
To assess the volume and quality of the data collected in terms of:
Time Frame: 3 months
Similarity of collected data distribution to expected data distribution, where expected data distribution will be determined based on literature and similarity of the two distributions evaluated by a suitable statistical technique (e.g., Kolmogorov-Smirnov test)
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To ascertain whether marked physiological events can be detected using smartphone and connected device sensors in a remote setting.
Time Frame: 3 months
Using clinical endpoints such as exacerbation events and readmission to predict exacerbation episodes
3 months
To assess the relationship between patient-generated data gathered from smartphone and connected devices and conventional clinical measures at point of readmission.
Time Frame: 3 months
The prediction of physiological measures at readmission (e.g., pulse rate, respiratory rate, pH, FBC, CRP, and CXR appearance) can be addressed as a regression task and evaluated with metrics such as root mean squared error (RMSE).
3 months
To assess the relationship between patient-generated data gathered from smartphone and connected devices and patient reported functional status.
Time Frame: 3 months
The prediction of reported outcome measures (CAT; EQ-5D; SGRQ-C) can also be addressed as a regression task, evaluated with RMSE, as detailed above.
3 months
To assess the change in passively generated data at the time of further community intervention (HCP review and/or prescription for corticosteroids or antibiotics).
Time Frame: 3 months
Acquired physiological and environmental data before and after community intervention will be compared using appropriate statistical tests to identify whether effects of these interventions were detectable in the acquired physiological data. We will also attempt to use machine learning models for the classification tasks of predicting corticosteroids, antibiotics, or HCP review outcome) using the physiological and environmental data in the time window prior to the specified community intervention outcome.
3 months
To evaluate the usability and acceptability of patient-generated data gathered from smartphone and connected devices in a remote setting in patients with COPD.
Time Frame: 3 months
Summary of the outcomes measured in the HCP mHealth app usability questionnaire (MAUQ) and other app analytics will be generated using standard summary statistics measures (mean/median, standard deviation, confidence intervals). This data will be assessed in relation to app and usage analytics such as compliance rate, drop-out rate, and device wear time.
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 22, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 18, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 7, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 7, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COPD Exacerbation

Clinical Trials on Observational

Subscribe