Comparison Of Outcome Of Antibiotic Coated Vicryl Vs Non-Coated Vicryl In Abdominal Fascial Closure After Laparotomy In Children

February 15, 2024 updated by: Muhammad Adeel Ashiq
We are investigating outcome of antibiotic coated vicryl versus non coated vicryl in terms of rate of surgical site infection and lebgth of hospital stay in children after lalaprotomy for perforated viscera. total 100 patients will be taken and 50 in each group.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Pneumoperitoneum is typically a surgical emergency, particularly in children and more than 90% of occurrences are caused by perforation of the gastrointestinal tract and other hollow viscera. Wound infections after abdominal surgery are still frequent types of nosocomial infections. Sutures can be a source of wound infection and dehisence due to bacterial adherence and colonization. Sutures coated with antibacterial agents have been developed in an attempt to reduce bacterial adherence and colonization of suture materials. The objective of the study is to compare the outcome of antibiotic coated vicryl versus non-coated vicryl in abdominal fascial closure after laparotomy in children in regards of surgical site infections. It will be a randomized controlled trial in which 100 patients admitted in Children Hospital Lahore will be included. Simple random sampling will be carried out. Informed written consent will be taken from patients' guardian. The patients will be divided into two groups (50 in each group). Group-A patients will undergo laparotomy closure with antibiotic coated vicryl while Group-B patient will experience non-coated vicryl in abdominal fascial closure. All patients will be examined on 3rd, 7th and 30th post-operative day for wound infection according to Southampton wound scoring system. Data will be collected through predesigned proforma, which will be entered and statistically analyzed using SPSS version 24.0. For quantitative variables mean and standard deviation will be calculated and for qualitative variables frequency and percentages will be calculated. Data will be presented in tables and graphs. Chi-square test will be used to estimate the association between qualitative variables. P-value <0.05 will be considered significant. It is expected that results of this study may be helpful for healthcare providers to provide appropriate treatment to the patients and to prevent them from wound related complications.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Punjab
      • Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan, 42000
        • The Children Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • • Children with pneumoperitoneum / perforated viscus

    • Children aged 0 day to 15 years
    • Both genders

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Malnourished children

    • Children aged above 15 years
    • Clean surgeries
    • Low Hb level
    • Parents unwilling to take part

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: anti biotic coated group
in this group fascial closure was done with antibiotic coated vicryl to compare with non coated vicryl after lapaprotomy in contaminated wounds
No Intervention: non coated group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of surgical site infection
Time Frame: 30 days
rate of surgical site infection will be measured in percentage
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 13, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

February 14, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 8, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 13, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 16, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 15, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgical Site Infection

Clinical Trials on antibiotic coated vicryl used for fascial closure

Subscribe