Subcision With PRP and Microneedling Versus Subcision With Saline and Micro-needling in Treatment of Posttraumatic Scars

July 30, 2024 updated by: Howida Omar Twisy, Assiut University

Subcision With Platelet-Rich Plasma and Microneedling Versus Subcision With Saline and Micro-needling in Treatment of Posttraumatic Scars: Randomized Clinical Trial

Compare different minimally invasive approaches to reach optimum improvement by comparing the efficacy and safety of both combined subcision with platelet-rich plasma and microneedling versus combined subcision with saline and microneedling in the treatment of post-traumatic scars.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The scars at the level of the skin represent a normal and inevitable process of healing traumatic or surgical lesions, but except for the appearance of the skin, they also have a profound psychological impact . Thus, people with scars try to integrate them into their sense of self to gain psychological acceptance .

Many treatment options have been developed for the management of traumatic scars .Surgical intervention is an invasive technique, surgery has a high risk of inducing new scar formation .

Non-surgical approaches for the treatment of traumatic scars include topical treatments and minimally invasive approached as subcision,microneedling and laser.

Autologous platelet-rich plasma is plasma with a higher concentration of platelets than normally found, it can enhance wound healing which has been demonstrated in controlled studies for soft and hard tissues . The application of autologous platelet-rich plasma to surgical wounds has been shown to accelerate tissue repair and reduce postoperative pain .

Subcision is a procedure in which a needle is inserted under the skin and passed in multiple directions . Although subcision is adequate as a stand-alone treatment, improved results are achieved when it is combined with other modalities.

Microneedling is a percutaneous collagen induction therapy that causes skin resurfacing. It involves using fine needles to create controlled microdermal injuries starting a complex cascade of growth factors that end in collagen remodeling .

Because of the different treatment options available for this common problem, the current work aimed to combine and compare different minimally invasive approaches to reach optimum improvement.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Assiut, Egypt
        • Faculty of medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with posttraumatic scars
  • Age more than 12 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with platelet or blood clotting disorders, and chronic liver or autoimmune diseases.
  • Patients with chronic debilitating diseases, uncontrolled systemic infection, or keloid tendency or with unrealistic expectations.
  • Pregnant females.
  • Patients who did not complete the treatment sessions or the follow-up period.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: combined subcision with platelet-rich plasma and microneedling group
minimally invasive procedures
Active Comparator: combined subcision with saline and microneedling group
minimally invasive procedures

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Scar severity grading
Time Frame: after 1 month of treatment completion.
Scar severity grading will be evaluated by blinded dermatologist
after 1 month of treatment completion.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 12, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 12, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 31, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 30, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Post traumatic scars treatment

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post-Traumatic Scar

Clinical Trials on subcision ,PRP or saline and microneedling

Subscribe