- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06135662
Comparing Tunnel Technique and CAF With CTG in Mandibular Gingival Recession Treatment
Tunnel Technique Versus Coronally Advanced Flap Combined With a Connective Tissue Graft for the Treatment of Mandibular Gingival Recessions: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This clinical trial is designed to rigorously assess the effectiveness of two surgical techniques, the Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF) and the Tunnel Technique (TT) with Connective Tissue Grafts (CTG), in the treatment of mandibular gingival recession, specifically targeting RT1 and RT2 types of recessions. The primary objective of this study is to determine which of these approaches provides superior root coverage in managing mandibular recession defects. The secondary objectives include evaluating the impact of these treatments on keratinized tissue gain, changes in vestibular depth, variations in gingival thickness, and patient-reported outcomes such as pain and aesthetic satisfaction.
Healthy participants diagnosed with mandibular gingival recession will be enrolled and randomly assigned to undergo either the CAF or TT+CTG surgical procedure. The study will follow a structured timeline with a total of six assessment visits for each participant, scheduled at key intervals: 1 week, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-operation. These time points are chosen to effectively monitor both the immediate and the long-term results of the treatments.
The primary outcome measure, Mean Root Coverage (MRC), will be evaluated at each follow-up visit to quantify the extent of root coverage achieved by the respective surgical techniques. Secondary outcome measures include the assessment of Vestibular Depth (VD), Complete Root Coverage (CRC), changes in Keratinized Tissue Width (KT), and changes in Gingival Thickness (GT). These measures will provide a comprehensive understanding of the physiological and aesthetic impacts of the surgical interventions.
By comparing the outcomes from both treatment groups, the study aims to provide clear evidence on the effectiveness of CAF versus TT+CTG in treating mandibular gingival recession, guiding future clinical decisions and patient care strategies in periodontology.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Gonzalo Blasi, DDS MS
- Phone Number: +34 620387688
- Email: gonzaloblasi@uic.es
Study Locations
-
-
Barcelona
-
Sant Cugat del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain, 08195
- Recruiting
- UIC Barcelona - Clinica Universitaria de Odontologia
-
Contact:
- UIC Universidad Internacional de Catalunya
- Phone Number: 935042030
- Email: clinica@uic.es
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- ≥18 years; periodontally and systemically healthy
- presence of RT1 and RT2 gingival recession defects
- recession in the mandibular arch
- recession ≥ 2mm in depth at the buccal aspect
- full-mouth plaque and bleeding score ≤ 20%
- no previous periodontal surgery
- presence of identifiable cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) (a step ≤1mm at the CEJ and/or presence of root abrasion, but with identifiable CEJ, will be accepted).
Exclusion Criteria:
- smokers ≥10 cigarettes a day
- contraindications for periodontal surgery
- medications known to affect the gingiva or interfere with wound healing
- pregnancy
- active orthodontic therapy
- caries or restorations in the area to be treated
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: CAF + CTG
This arm involves patients treated with the Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF) technique, a recognized method for treating gingival recession.
As an active comparator, this arm serves to compare the effectiveness and outcomes of CAF against the alternative surgical method used in the study.
|
Surgical techniques for mandibular gingival recession: coronally advanced flap + connective tissue graft.
Participants undergo initial evaluations, including periodontal exams and digital imaging, followed by standardized pre-operative preparations.
Post-surgery, uniform care includes pain management and oral hygiene instructions, with follow-ups to monitor healing and assess outcomes.
Primary and secondary outcomes, like root coverage and patient-reported satisfaction, are consistently measured across groups.
Standardized data collection and analysis procedures ensure reliable, comparable results, facilitating an effective comparison of the surgical methods' efficacy.
|
|
Active Comparator: Tunnel Technique + CTG
Patients in this arm receive the Tunnel Technique (TT) with Connective Tissue Grafts (CTG).
Also an established method for gingival recession treatment, this arm acts as an active comparator to assess and compare the effectiveness of TT+CTG against the CAF technique.
|
Surgical techniques for mandibular gingival recession: tunnel technique + connective tissue graft.
Participants undergo initial evaluations, including periodontal exams and digital imaging, followed by standardized pre-operative preparations.
Post-surgery, uniform care includes pain management and oral hygiene instructions, with follow-ups to monitor healing and assess outcomes.
Primary and secondary outcomes, like root coverage and patient-reported satisfaction, are consistently measured across groups.
Standardized data collection and analysis procedures ensure reliable, comparable results, facilitating an effective comparison of the surgical methods' efficacy.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Root Coverage (MRC)
Time Frame: At 1 week, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-operation
|
he Mean Root Coverage measures the percentage of exposed tooth root that has been covered by gum tissue after surgery, compared to before the treatment.
|
At 1 week, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-operation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Vestibular depth (VD)
Time Frame: At 1 week, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-operation
|
Measurement of the depth of the vestibular area (the space between the inside of the lip/cheek and the gum) to assess changes post-surgery.
|
At 1 week, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-operation
|
|
Complete Root Coverage (CRC)
Time Frame: At 1 week, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-operation
|
Assessment of whether the entire exposed root surface is covered by gum tissue post-treatment.
|
At 1 week, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-operation
|
|
change in Keratinized Tissue Width (KT)
Time Frame: At 1 week, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-operation
|
Measurement of the width of keratinized tissue (gum tissue that is firmly attached to the bone) to note any changes following the surgical procedure.
|
At 1 week, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-operation
|
|
change in gingival thickness (GT)
Time Frame: At 1 week, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-operation
|
Assessment of the thickness of the gum tissue to evaluate changes after surgery.
|
At 1 week, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-operation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Gonzalo Blasi, DDS MS, Uic Barcelona
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Zucchelli G, De Sanctis M. Treatment of multiple recession-type defects in patients with esthetic demands. J Periodontol. 2000 Sep;71(9):1506-14. doi: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.9.1506.
- Cairo F, Nieri M, Cattabriga M, Cortellini P, De Paoli S, De Sanctis M, Fonzar A, Francetti L, Merli M, Rasperini G, Silvestri M, Trombelli L, Zucchelli G, Pini-Prato GP. Root coverage esthetic score after treatment of gingival recession: an interrater agreement multicenter study. J Periodontol. 2010 Dec;81(12):1752-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100278. Epub 2010 Jul 14.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- PER-ECL-2023-01
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Gingival Recession Localized Moderate
-
University Hospital, GhentRecruitingGingival Recession, Mucogingival Surgery | Gingival Recession, Generalized | Gingival Recession, Localized | Gingival Recession, Plastic Surgery | Gingival Recessions | Gingival Recession Generalized Moderate | Gingival Recession Localized ModerateBelgium
-
University Hospital, GhentRecruitingGingival Recession, Mucogingival Surgery | Gingival Recession | Gingival Recession, Localized | Gingival Recession, Plastic Surgery | Gingival Recession Localized ModerateBelgium
-
American Academy of Facial EstheticsMerz North America, Inc.Enrolling by invitationGingival Recession, Generalized | Tooth Sensitivity | Gingival Recession Generalized Moderate | Gingival Recession Localized ModerateUnited States
-
University of PaviaCompletedTooth Sensitivity | Gingival Recession Generalized Moderate | Gingival Recession Localized ModerateItaly
-
Damascus UniversityCompletedGingival Recession Localized ModerateSyrian Arab Republic
-
Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences RohtakRecruitingGingival Recession Localized ModerateIndia
-
Faculty of Dental Medicine for GirlsActive, not recruitingGingival Recession Localized Moderate | Dentin Hypersensitivity, Non-carious Cervical LesionsEgypt
-
Bulent Ecevit UniversityCompletedGingival Recession, LocalizedTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Enas ElgendyEnrolling by invitationPeriodontal Diseases | Platelet Rich Fibrin | Gingival Recession Localized Moderate | Nano-hydroxyapatite | Nano Tricalcium PhosphateEgypt
-
Ain Shams UniversityActive, not recruitingGingival Recession, LocalizedEgypt
Clinical Trials on CAF + CTG
-
University of FlorenceUniversity of Roma La SapienzaCompleted
-
Cairo UniversityUnknown
-
British University In EgyptNot yet recruiting
-
Cukurova UniversityCompleted
-
University of FlorenceCompleted
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedGingival RecessionEgypt
-
Gazi UniversityActive, not recruitingGingival Recession, LocalizedTurkey
-
Mauro SantamariaNot yet recruitingOral Mucosa Wound Healing After Gingival Recession Treatment in Diabetic Patients. A Clinical Study.Diabetes Mellitus | Gingival Recession, Generalized | Gingival Recession, LocalizedUnited States
-
University Hospital, GhentRecruitingGingival Recession, Mucogingival Surgery | Gingival Recession, Generalized | Gingival Recession, Localized | Gingival Recession, Plastic Surgery | Gingival Recessions | Gingival Recession Generalized Moderate | Gingival Recession Localized ModerateBelgium