5-SENSE Score Validation Study

June 4, 2026 updated by: Duke University

Prognostic Value of the 5-SENSE Score to Predict Focality of the Seizure-onset Zone as Assessed by Stereo-electroencephalography - a Prospective Multicenter Validation Study

The purpose of this study is to assess how well a new scoring system called the 5-SENSE score can predict where seizures start in the brain using Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG). The 5-SENSE Score is a 5-point score based on routine presurgical work-up, designed to assist in predicting whether SEEG can identify a focal seizure onset zone, thereby sparing patients the risk of undergoing this invasive diagnostic procedure.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

400

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Brisbane, Australia
        • Mater Health
      • Melbourne, Australia
        • Alfred Health
    • Victoria
      • Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3800
        • Monash University
      • Salzburg, Austria, 5020
        • Christian Doppler University Hospital Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg and Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience Salzburg
    • Nova Scotia
      • Dalhousie, Nova Scotia, Canada
        • Dalhousie Universiry and Hospital
    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canada
        • Wester University
      • Brno, Czechia
        • Departmet of Neurology, Masaryk University Brno
      • Aarhus, Denmark, 8200
        • Danish Epilepsy Centre, Aarhus Universitets Hospital
      • Grenoble, France
        • Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes
      • Marseille, France
        • Epilepsy Department University Hospitals of Marseille
      • Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
        • Epilepsy Centre, University Hospital Freiburg
      • Kyoto, Japan, 606-8303
        • University School of Medicine Kyoto
      • Bucharest, Romania
        • "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy
      • Valencia, Spain
        • Hospital Universitario y Politecnico La Fe
      • Lausanne, Switzerland
        • Department of Clinical Neurosciences chez CHUV; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32610
        • University of Florida College of Medicine
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern University
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University Health System
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15232
        • Presbyterian-Shadyside Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients will be prospectively recruited at 20-25 epilepsy centers from North America, Europe, Australia and Asia.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients aged 15 years or older in whom no direct surgical approach can be offered and who are discussed in the multidisciplinary team discussion
  • availability of complete non-invasive presurgical work-up (including high-resolution MRI according to the in-center epilepsy protocol, video-telemetry with the recording of a minimum of one habitual clinic and EEG seizure, available as original files for review)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • no telemetry/scalp EEG in center
  • no protocol MRI in center
  • subdural/GRID electrodes

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG)
Participants undergoing SEEG as part of standard of care.
Participants will under Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) as part of standard of care. This is not assigned by the protocol.
Control Group
Participants not undergoing SEEG as part of standard of care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Specificity of the 5-SENSE score for the identification of a focal SOZ on SEEG
Time Frame: At time of SEEG, up to approximately 1 month
Prospective validation of the predictive value of the 5-SENSE score to identify a focal seizure onset zone (SOZ) in an independent patient sample. Measured for participants undergoing SEEG.
At time of SEEG, up to approximately 1 month
Sensitivity of the 5-SENSE score for the identification of a focal SOZ on SEEG
Time Frame: At time of SEEG, up to approximately 1 month
Prospective validation of the predictive value of the 5-SENSE score to identify a focal seizure onset zone (SOZ) in an independent patient sample. Measured for participants undergoing SEEG.
At time of SEEG, up to approximately 1 month
Positive predictive value of the 5-SENSE score for the identification of a focal SOZ on SEEG
Time Frame: At time of SEEG, up to approximately 1 month
Measured for participants undergoing SEEG
At time of SEEG, up to approximately 1 month
Negative predictive value of the 5-SENSE score for the identification of a focal SOZ on SEEG
Time Frame: At time of SEEG, up to approximately 1 month
Measured for participants undergoing SEEG
At time of SEEG, up to approximately 1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Specificity of the 5-SENSE score augmented by information from auxiliary diagnostic methods for the identification of a focal SOZ on SEEG
Time Frame: At time of SEEG, up to approximately 1 month
For participants undergoing SEEG, information from auxiliary diagnostic methods, performed routinely during presurgical evaluation, namely FDG-PET, electrical source imaging (ESI) and/or magnetic source imaging (MSI) and ictal HMPAO-SPECT will be analyzed. The investigators will assess whether addition of those variables to the 5-SENSE Score could enhance score performance with higher specificity for identifying a focal SOZ
At time of SEEG, up to approximately 1 month
Sensitivity of the 5-SENSE score augmented by information from auxiliary diagnostic methods for the identification of a focal SOZ on SEEG
Time Frame: At time of SEEG, up to approximately 1 month
For participants undergoing SEEG, information from auxiliary diagnostic methods, performed routinely during presurgical evaluation, namely FDG-PET, electrical source imaging (ESI) and/or magnetic source imaging (MSI) and ictal HMPAO-SPECT will be analyzed. The investigators will assess whether addition of those variables to the 5-SENSE Score could enhance score performance with higher sensitivity for identifying a focal SOZ
At time of SEEG, up to approximately 1 month
Concordance of the 5-SENSE Score with the decision whether to proceed with SEEG or not
Time Frame: At enrollment
Before SEEG, the decision whether to proceed with SEEG or not is made blinded from the 5- SENSE Score in a Multidisciplinary Team Discussion (MTD). Following the decision, the 5-SENSE Score will be calculated for each participant by the principal investigator. Concordance of the 5-SENSE Score with the decision made in the MTD will be assessed.
At enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Birgit Frauscher, MD PD, Duke University
  • Principal Investigator: Alexandra Astner-Rohracher, Christian Doppler University Hospital Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg and Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience Salzburg

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 9, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 4, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Epilepsy Intractable

Clinical Trials on Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG)

Subscribe