Assessing Detection Algorithms for Insulin Pump Malfunctions in Type 1 Diabetes

December 7, 2023 updated by: Daniela Bruttomesso, University of Padova

Pilot Study for the Evaluation of Algorithms for the Detection of Subcutaneous Insulin Pump Malfunctions in Subjects With Type 1 Diabetes

The goal of this clinical trial is to test the effectiveness of fault-detection algorithms in detecting malfunctioning of the insulin infusion system in an artificial pancreas (also known as Automated Insulin Delivery system) for type 1 diabetes.

The main questions it aims to answer is:

"Are the proposed algorithms effective in detecting insulin suspension?" Effectiveness accounts for both high sensitivity (i.e. the fraction of suspension correctly detected) and low false alarm rate.

The study has three phases:

  • free-living artificial pancreas data collection,
  • in-patient induction of hyperglycemia (mimicking an insulin pump malfunction),
  • retrospective analysis of the collected data to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms in detecting insulin suspension.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

In individuals with type 1 diabetes, adjusting insulin doses to accommodate the ever-changing conditions of daily life is crucial for achieving satisfactory metabolic control. To address this challenge, researchers have developed an Automated Insulin Delivery (AID) system, commonly known as an artificial pancreas. This system comprises of an insulin pump, a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) sensor, and a sophisticated control algorithm. The algorithm uses CGM data to calculate the insulin dose required to maintain good glycemic control, and it automatically commands the insulin infusion.

However, artificial pancreas systems can experience malfunctions, some of which are highly risky. The most dangerous malfunctions include insulin pump failures and infusion set occlusions, which lead to prolonged interruptions in insulin delivery. This exposes the patient to the risk of hyperglycemia and, even more dangerously, ketoacidosis, a severe complication that can result in hospitalization and, in severe cases, death. Unfortunately, patients do not always notice these issues in a timely manner.

This study aims to test new algorithms for detecting pump/infusion set malfunctions that result in reduced or interrupted insulin delivery. The study consists of three phases:

  • Phase 1: Preliminary Data Collection (Free-living Data) In this phase, data related to glycemic trends and insulin administration in free-living conditions are collected. This data is obtained from a download form the patient's artificial pancreas. The one-month session is designed to gather a substantial amount of patient-specific data to enable the algorithms to learn how insulin and meals impact the patient's glycemia as recorded by the CGM sensor. During this phase, the patient continues to use their artificial pancreas in their daily life.
  • Phase 2: Induction of Hyperglycemia The second phase involves the patient visiting the clinic, where, according to a specific protocol and a defined schedule, insulin infusion is temporarily suspended to simulate a pump malfunction. The resulting episode of hyperglycemia is closely monitored under medical supervision. At the end of the experiment, the study team assists the patient in restoring euglycemia before returning home.
  • Phase 3: Retrospective Data Analysis In this phase, the collected data is retrospectively analyzed to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms in detecting insulin suspension, simulating a pump malfunction. The sensitivity of the tested methods is assessed as the fraction of insulin suspensions (simulating a malfunction) correctly detected.

The uniqueness of this dataset lies in the controlled induction of malfunction, achieved by disconnecting the insulin pump and monitoring the resulting hyperglycemic episode. The presence of malfunctions in this data is certain and precisely characterized in terms of the start time and duration. The dataset resulting from this experimentation will be a valuable tool for the scientific community, enabling the retrospective testing of fault detection algorithms.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 18 (included) and 70 years
  • At least 1 year from the diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus
  • Body mass index (BMI) less than 30 kg/m²
  • Treated with automated insulin delivery system (AID) for at least 3 months
  • Using carbohydrate counting to calculate meal bolus
  • Glycated hemoglobin < 10%
  • If treated with antihypertensive, thyroid, antidepressant or lipid-lowering drugs, the therapy must be stable for at least 1 month before enrolment and remain stable for the entire duration of the study
  • Awareness of the study design and purpose
  • Willingness to undergo the study procedures
  • Signing the informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding; pregnancy planning (effective contraception is required in women of childbearing age)
  • Hematocrit less than 36% in females and less than 38% in males
  • Presence of ischemic heart disease or congestive heart failure or history of a cerebrovascular event
  • Therapy with a drug that significantly affects glucose metabolism (e.g. steroids)
  • Uncontrolled hypertension
  • Allergy or adverse reaction to insulin
  • Known adrenal problems, pancreatic cancer, or insulinoma
  • Any comorbid condition affecting glucose metabolism as judged by the investigator
  • Current alcohol abuse, substance abuse, or serious mental illness, as judged by the investigator
  • Unstable proliferative retinopathy according to fundus examination within the last year
  • Known hemorrhagic diathesis or dyscrasia
  • Blood donation in the last 3 months
  • Renal failure with creatinine > 150 μmol/L
  • Impaired hepatic function based on plasma AST/ALT levels > 2 times the upper limits of normal values

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Insulin pump fault simulation
Collection of patients data during outpatient use of AID (automated insulin delivery); Inpatient simulation of insulin pump faults by suspension of insulin administration.
The intervention will consist in simulating an insulin pump failure by suspending insulin infusion and monitoring the consequent hyperglycemia.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity
Time Frame: During the intervention (during the inpatient insulin suspension to simulate a pump fault)
Fraction of correctly detected insulin suspension in the population
During the intervention (during the inpatient insulin suspension to simulate a pump fault)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
False positive per day
Time Frame: Baseline pre-intervention (during the outpatient data collection)
Number of false alarms (normalized by the number of days of monitoring)
Baseline pre-intervention (during the outpatient data collection)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

December 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 15, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 22, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 27, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 14, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 5731/AO/23 (Other Identifier: CESC- Comitato Etico Sprimentazione Clinica)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus, Type I

Clinical Trials on Simulation of an insulin pump failure

3
Subscribe