The Importance of the Number of Incisions in the Effectiveness of Dry Needling

April 27, 2026 updated by: Prof. Dr. Daniel Pecos Martín, University of Alcala

Effectiveness of the Dry Needling Technique According to the Number of Incisions in the Treatment of Neck Pain

The dry needling technique is a procedure increasingly used by health professionals.

Dry needling consists of the use of a filiform needle to treat musculoskeletal pain. Currently, the mechanisms by which it is an effective technique are not well understood. One of the aspects not yet evaluated is the best dose in terms of the number of times it is necessary to insert the needle into the patient to achieve the best result.

This research work aims to assess which treatment obtains the best results in the management of patients with chronic neck pain.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

With the objective of demonstrating how the dose used during the application of the dry needling technique is related to the effectiveness of the treatment, we have designed a study where three different doses of the dry needling technique for the treatment of myofascial trigger points will be compared in the upper trapezius muscle in participants with neck pain.

Randomly, the participants will be distributed to each of the treatment groups and we will measure how the effectiveness of each of the applied doses determines the result of the application of the dry needling technique in the treatment of neck pain.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Madrid
      • Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain, 28805
        • Physiotherapy and Pain Institute
      • Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain, 28805
        • Centro Investigación Fisioterapia y Dolor

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Nonspecific mechanical neck pain for more than 3 months.
  • Neck pain of at least VAS 5/10.
  • Reproduction of pain and symptoms subjects on palpation.
  • Pain on passive stretching of the muscle.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with previous surgical intervention.
  • Subjects undergoing other intervention (rehabilitation/medication).
  • Positive findings that raise suspicion of cervical radiculopathy:
  • Subjects diagnosed: degenerative arthropathies, inflammatory, systemic conditions (fibromyalgia).
  • Cardiovascular diseases.
  • Whiplash or whiplash.
  • Belenophobia.
  • Dizziness and vertigo.
  • Pregnant.
  • Thyroid disorders.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dose of five muscle incisions
Subjects treated in this group will receive an in-out technique with a dosage of five incisions in the myofascial trigger point of the levator scapulae muscle.
Once we have assessed the existence of a myofascial trigger point in the levator scapulae muscle, and while the subject is in lateral decubitus on the same side, with a forceps palpation, we apply a rapid in /out dry needling technique (five incisions).
Experimental: Dose of ten muscle incisions
Subjects treated in this group will receive an in-out technique with a dosage of ten incisions in the myofascial trigger point of the levator scapulae muscle.
Once we have assessed the existence of a myofascial trigger point in the levator scapulae muscle, and while the subject is in lateral decubitus on the same side, with a forceps palpation, we apply a rapid in /out dry needling technique (ten incisions).
Experimental: Dose of fifteen muscle incisions
Subjects treated in this group will receive an in-out technique with a dosage of fifteen incisions in the myofascial trigger point of the levator scapulae muscle.
Once we have assessed the existence of a myofascial trigger point in the levator scapulae muscle, and while the subject is in lateral decubitus on the same side, with a forceps palpation, we apply a rapid in /out dry needling technique (fifteen incisions).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neck pain
Time Frame: Change From Baseline in Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale at one month.
Visual Analog Scale (VAS). VAS is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity, used to record patients' pain progression, or compare pain severity between patients with similar conditions. It is a straight horizontal line of fixed length, usually 100 mm where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst possible pain.
Change From Baseline in Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale at one month.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disability (Neck disability index)
Time Frame: Change From Baseline in Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale at one month.
This questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how your neck pain has affected your ability to manage in everyday life. It´s value ranges from 0 to 10 to 50 points, where 0 is the absence of disability and 50 is the highest degree of disability.
Change From Baseline in Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale at one month.
Pain catastrophizing
Time Frame: Change From Baseline in Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale at one month.
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). The PCS is a 13-item instrumen that task participants to reflect on past painful experiences, and to indicate the degree to which they experienced each of 13 thoughts or feelings when experiencing pain, on 5-point scales with the end points (0) not at all and (4) all the time. The PCS total scores range from 0 - 52. 0 is the best result and 52 is the worst result.
Change From Baseline in Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale at one month.
kinesiophobia
Time Frame: Change From Baseline in Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale at one month.
The Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) describe patient circumstances characterised by an "excessive, irrational, and debilitating fear of physical movement and activity resulting from a feeling of vulnerability to painful injury or reinjury. The TSK is a 17 item assessment checklist.The 17 item TSK total scores range from 17 to 68 where the lowest 17 means no or negligible kinesiophobia, and the higher scores indicate an increasing degree of kinesiophobia.
Change From Baseline in Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale at one month.
The Global Rating of Change (GRoC)
Time Frame: Change From Baseline in Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale at one month.
It's a scale that assesses whether the patient condition has gotten worse, better, or stayed
Change From Baseline in Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale at one month.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Daniel Pecos-Martin, PhD, Alcala University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 4, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 20, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 20, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 29, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neck Pain

Clinical Trials on Dose of five-incisions dry needling technique

Subscribe