Clinical Controlled Study on the Efficacy of Denosumab in Treating Osteoporosis in the Domestic Population and Its Impact on Sarcopenia-related Outcomes

August 15, 2024 updated by: Wuhan Union Hospital, China
Through the method of a clinical randomized controlled trial, patients meeting the study criteria are randomly assigned to either the Denosumab treatment group or a placebo group. After a treatment period of 12 months, the differences in osteoporosis and sarcopenia-related baseline assessment changes between the two groups are compared. This is to explore the effect of Denosumab in treating osteoporosis and its impact on sarcopenia. The goal is to evaluate the efficacy of Denosumab in treating osteoporosis in the domestic population and its related impact on sarcopenia, with the aim of providing an effective treatment option for the domestic population suffering from 'osteoporosis-sarcopenia syndrome.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

86

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Hubei
      • Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430022
        • Recruiting
        • Union Hospital Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of postmenopausal/senile osteoporosis after examination and assessment.
  • Clinical diagnosis of postmenopausal/senile osteoporosis combined with sarcopenia after examination and assessment.
  • Have not previously taken any other anti-osteoporosis drugs.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of pathological fractures.
  • Have participated in another clinical trial within the past 3 months or have taken other anti-osteoporosis drugs within the past 6 months.
  • Severe chronic metabolic diseases or serious organ failure.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Denosumab Group
Denosumab injection 60mg (1.0ml/ branch, Jiangsu Taikang Biological Medicine Co., LTD., s20233111), once every 6 months, 60mg, subcutaneous injection, at the same time to supplement calcium and vitamin D.
Denosumab injection 60mg (1.0ml/ branch, Jiangsu Taikang Biological Medicine Co., LTD., s20233111), once every 6 months, 60mg, subcutaneous injection, at the same time to supplement calcium and vitamin D.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Group
Placebo drug, the main component of normal saline injection (1.0ml/ dose). In addition to the different production batch number, its appearance, character, specification, administration mode and frequency are exactly the same as the experimental group of drugs (different production batch number is convenient for later unblinding reference). Take calcium and vitamin D supplements. The study lasted for 12 months.
Placebo drug, the main component of normal saline injection (1.0ml/ dose). In addition to the different production batch number, its appearance, character, specification, administration mode and frequency are exactly the same as the experimental group of drugs (different production batch number is convenient for later unblinding reference). Take calcium and vitamin D supplements.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Osteoporosis-related Primary Outcome
Time Frame: 1 year

Bone mineral density (BMD) changed from baseline after 6 and 12 months of treatment in both groups. (DXA method, T value has no specific unit of measure)

Bone transformation markers (BTM) changed from baseline after 6 and 12 months of treatment in both groups. (Total P1NP(ng/ml), total 25 hydroxyvitamin D(nmol/L), osteocalcin N-terminal fragment(ng/ml), βCrossLap(pg/ml))

After 6 and 12 months of treatment, osteoporosis related blood biochemistry(TBIL, DBIL, Cr, UA, HCY in umol/L, BUN, TC, TG, HDL, LDL, Ca, IP in mmol/L, ALB, PAB in g/L, CK, ALT, AST, GGT in U/L), blood routine(WBC, PLT, NEU, LYMPH, MONO, EOS in G/L, RBC in T/L, HGB in g/L), inflammatory indicators(IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6 in pg/mL), and related hormones(PTH, CT in ng/L) changed from baseline.

Changes in the above indicators from the baseline are possible or hypothetical, and all are subject to experimental results.

1 year
Sarcopenia-related Primary Outcome
Time Frame: 1 year

After 6 and 12 months of treatment, the SARC-F scale was evaluated compared with baseline.(No unit of measure)

After 6 and 12 months of treatment, muscle strength (dominant hand grip strength, Kg) changed from baseline in both groups.

After 6 and 12 months of treatment, skeletal muscle mass (ASM in Kg), skeletal muscle mass index (ASM and height will be combined to report ASMI in Kg/m²), body fat percentage(%) and limb fat percentage(%)in both groups were changed from baseline. (BIA method)

After 6 and 12 months of treatment, the walking speed of 6 M(m/s) and the sitting time of 5 times(s) were changed from baseline.

Changes in the above indicators from the baseline are possible or hypothetical, and all are subject to experimental results.

1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of life and fall risk
Time Frame: 1 year

Changes in quality of life and fall risk from baseline were assessed using the abbreviated Health Survey Form (SF-36) and the Morse Fall Risk Assessment Scale at the end of 12 months of treatment in both groups.(The score has no specific unit of measure)

Changes in the above scale from the baseline are possible or hypothetical, and all are subject to experimental results.

1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 10, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 23, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

December 4, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 16, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 15, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sarcopenia

Clinical Trials on Denosumab Injection

Subscribe