- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06160973
Food as Medicine for Families (FAME-F)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Medically tailored meals are thought to improve health by providing healthy foods, reducing food insecurity, and improving diet quality. However, there are two key open questions regarding implementation of medically tailored meals. One regards the 'target' of the intervention, and the other regards the mechanism of delivering the intervention. With regard to the target, there is an ongoing question about whether to provide meals for a specific individual only or for the entire household. Since food is shared in households, not feeding other household members could limit intervention effectiveness by 'underdosing' the intervention actually received by the target individual. Further, engaging in and sustaining healthy behavior change may be more difficult if others in the household are not involved, or if there is still not enough food to go around, resulting in ongoing household-level food insecurity despite the intervention. However, feeding the household is more expensive than feeding only a specific individual (although there are economies of scale). To date, medically tailored meal programs more commonly use a 'feed the individual' strategy, but some medically tailored meal organizations prefer a 'feed the household' strategy. Further, momentum is growing for a 'feed the household' strategy, perhaps best exemplified by Massachusetts' 1115 Waiver 'Flexible Services' re-authorization, the largest publicly funded medically tailored meal program in the country at the present time, which does include authorization to provide meals for the household in certain circumstances. Thus currently both strategies are in use by payers, though there is no evidence directly comparing them.
With regard to the delivery mechanism, medically tailored meals have historically been delivered by a member of the medically tailored meal organization. This personal connection is thought to have important benefits with regard to combating loneliness and social isolation, and features prominently as a mechanism of benefit in accounts from meal delivery organizations, prominently Meals on Wheels. However, shipping meals using commercial logistics firms (e.g., UPS) is likely less expensive and may allow reach into rural areas where a dedicated delivery driver may be cost prohibitive.
In this study, the investigators will conduct a 2x2 factorial randomized trial of 100 medically tailored meal participants in New England to help answer these questions. The first 'dimension' of the trial will test the impact of a 'feed the individual' vs. a 'feed the household' strategy for medically tailored meals. The second dimension will test the two methods of meal delivery (dedicated driver vs. commercial shipping). Key outcomes will be diet quality, loneliness, food security, and satisfaction with the program. The goal of this study is to determine the appropriate target of medically tailored meals and means of delivery, to inform subsequent medically tailored meal trials.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
North Carolina
-
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- No plans to move from the area for next 6 months
- Free living to the extent that participant has control over dietary intake
- Willing and able to provide written informed consent and participate in all study activities
- Able to complete study activities in English or Spanish
Exclusion Criteria:
- Lack of safe, stable residence and ability to store meals
- Lack of telephone
- Known psychosis or major psychiatric illness that prevents participation with study activities
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Feed the household; Dedicated driver
Medically tailored meals will be provided for the enrolled individual, with additional meals provided as needed for others living the same household; Medically tailored meals will be delivered each week by a driver who is an employee of Community Servings
|
Medically tailored meals will be provided for the enrolled individual, with additional meals provided as needed for others living the same household
Medically tailored meals will be delivered each week by a driver who is an employee of Community Servings
|
|
Active Comparator: Feed the individual; Dedicated driver
Medically tailored meals will be provided for the enrolled individual; Medically tailored meals will be delivered each week by a driver who is an employee of Community Servings
|
Medically tailored meals will be delivered each week by a driver who is an employee of Community Servings
Medically tailored meals will be provided for the enrolled individual
|
|
Active Comparator: Feed the individual; Commercial shipper
Medically tailored meals will be provided for the enrolled individual; Meals will be delivered by a commercial shipping organization
|
Medically tailored meals will be provided for the enrolled individual
Meals will be delivered by a commercial shipping organization
|
|
Active Comparator: Feed the household; Commercial shipper
Medically tailored meals will be provided for the enrolled individual, with additional meals provided as needed for others living the same household; Meals will be delivered by a commercial shipping organization
|
Medically tailored meals will be provided for the enrolled individual, with additional meals provided as needed for others living the same household
Meals will be delivered by a commercial shipping organization
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Healthy Eating Index Total Score
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Healthy Eating Index Score of diet quality, ranging from 0-100 with greater scores indicating greater diet quality.
Derived from DietID assessments.
This is the primary outcome for the 'feed the household' vs. 'feed the individual' aspect of the study.
|
12 weeks
|
|
De Jong Gierveld Total Loneliness Score
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
The 11-item De Jong Gierveld Total Loneliness instrument will be used.
Scores range from 0 to 11 with greater scores indicating greater loneliness.
This is the primary outcome for the 'dedicated driver' vs. 'commercial shipper' aspect of the study.
|
12 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Healthy Eating Index Subscores
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
13 subcomponents of the Healthy Eating Index Score of diet quality, ranging from 0-5, 0-10, or 0-20, with greater scores indicating greater diet quality.
Derived from DietID assessments.
These subscores are summed to yield the Healthy Eating Index Total Score
|
12 weeks
|
|
Dietary Screener Questionnaire (DSQ) Scores
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Following current recommendations, the Dietary Screener Questionnaire results will be score to produce consumption estimates and other derived variables. In general, greater consumption of foods to be emphasized is associated with better health, and lower consumption of foods to be consumed in moderation is associated with better health. https://epi.grants.cancer.gov/nhanes/dietscreen/scoring/current/ |
12 weeks
|
|
Household Food Security Survey Module
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
The 18-item USDA Household Food Security Survey Module with 30-day lookback period will be administered.
This will produce a raw score and categories of food insecurity, consistent with established scoring.
https://www.ers.usda.gov/media/8271/hh2012.pdf
|
12 weeks
|
|
Health-Related Quality of Life
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
The EuroQol Five Dimension - Five Level (EQ-5D-5L) will be used to produce quality of life and health utility scores.
Health utility scores range from 0 to 1, with 1 representing perfect health.
https://euroqol.org/eq-5d-instruments/eq-5d-5l-about/
|
12 weeks
|
|
Econ QOL Score
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
The Econ QOL Score will be used to capture economic quality of life.
Resulting scores are on a T score metric (M=50, SD=10); higher scores indicate better economic quality of life
|
12 weeks
|
|
De Jong Gierveld Emotional Loneliness Score
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Scores range from 0 to 6 with greater scores indicating greater emotional loneliness
|
12 weeks
|
|
De Jong Gierveld Social Loneliness Score
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Scores range from 0 to 5 with greater scores indicating greater social loneliness
|
12 weeks
|
|
Depressive Symptoms
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form v1.0 - Depression 8a will be used to measure depressive symptoms.
Greater scores indicate greater depressive symptoms.
|
12 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Seth A Berkowitz, MD MPH, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 23-2420
- 24RPGFIM1198190 (Other Grant/Funding Number: American Heart Association)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Loneliness
-
Education University of Hong KongRecruiting
-
Education University of Hong KongThe University of Hong KongRecruiting
-
University College, LondonUniversity of Manchester; National Academy for Social Prescribing; We Do WellbeingActive, not recruiting
-
University of RochesterNational Institute on Aging (NIA)Completed
-
Vladimíra DostálováBarcelona Institute for Global HealthActive, not recruiting
-
University College, LondonUniversity of ManchesterActive, not recruiting
-
Taipei Medical UniversityCompleted
-
Linkoeping UniversityUniversity College, LondonCompleted
-
KTO Karatay UniversityCompleted
Clinical Trials on Feed the Household
-
Florida International UniversityAcademy of Nutrition and DieteticsCompletedObesity, ChildhoodUnited States
-
Barts & The London NHS TrustBristol Royal Infirmary; Institute of Child HealthCompleted
-
Hiroshima Kyoritsu HospitalCompleted
-
Nutricia UK LtdUniversity College London Hospitals; Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and other collaboratorsRecruitingEnteral Feeds | Enteral Nutrition (Food for Special Medical Purposes)United Kingdom
-
Boston Children's HospitalRecruiting
-
The Netherlands Cancer InstituteUMC UtrechtCompletedCancer Genetics | Psychosocial IssuesNetherlands
-
Florida International UniversityCompleted
-
Partners in HealthUniversity of WarwickCompletedEpilepsy | Hypertension | Diabetes | HIV/AIDS | Malnutrition | Asthma | Tuberculosis | Mental Health Disorder | Family Planning | Antenatal CareMalawi
-
New York City Department of Health and Mental HygieneActive, not recruitingEmergency PreparednessUnited States
-
The University of Hong KongEnrolling by invitation