Patient Satisfaction and Adaptation of Dentures Printed at 0 Versus 45 Degrees

December 1, 2023 updated by: Iman Abd-ElWahab Radi, PhD, Cairo University

Patient Satisfaction and Adaptation of Maxillary Resin Dentures Printed at 0 Versus 45 Degrees Build Angle: A Randomized Pilot Cross-over Clinical Trial

This pilot study aims to compare the difference, if present in patient satisfaction, denture base adaptation and retention in 3d printed maxillary complete dentures fabricated at a build angle of 0 degrees versus 45 degrees.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This pilot study aims to compare the difference, if present in patient satisfaction, denture base adaptation and retention in 3d printed maxillary complete dentures fabricated at a build angle of zero degrees versus forty five degrees. Since there is no sufficient evidence surrounding the topic at hand, a randomized clinical trial must be conducted in an attempt to gap the clinical knowledge regarding printing orientation and its effect on denture base adaptation and patient satisfaction. The main question and the one that needs further investigations as stated by Goodacre would these differences in these build up angles have a true clinical effect on denture adaptation and denture retention

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients above the age of 40
  2. Patients with opposing full natural dentition or completely or partially edentulous arches
  3. Opposing arch should be either having a set of full natural dentition or is restored by fixed partial dentures or implants
  4. Cooperative patients that are willing to attend all follow-up periods.
  5. Patients with healthy attached mucosa of appropriate thickness free from any inflammation.

6- Patients free from any systemic disease that might affect the health of the bone or of the mucosa eg diabetes

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with any temporomandibular joint disorder or parafunctional habits
  2. Patients with flabby or flat ridges
  3. Patients with extreme anatomical limitations such as a large torus that requires surgical excision.
  4. Patients with a history of allergy to dentures made of resins.
  5. Patients with pathological changes of residual ridges as recurrent or persistent ulcers, osteomyelitis and infections.
  6. Patients with medical or psychological conditions as physical disability or mental retardation that hinder cooperation in the follow up visits and answering the questionnaires.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 0 Degrees Group
dentures will be printed at a 0 degrees build angle
3d printed dentures at a build angle of 0 degrees
Active Comparator: 45 Degrees Group
dentures will be printed at a 45 degrees build angle
3d printed dentures at a build angle of 45 degrees

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 6 months
Measured through a questionnaire using a likert scale from 1 - 5 with 1 being extremely satisfied with the intervention and 5 being extremely satisfied with the intervention
6 months
denture adaptation
Time Frame: 4 weeks
measured using 3d metrology software in terms of the root mean square (RMS) values of trueness and adaptation
4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Denture retention
Time Frame: 6 months
Measured using Kapur scoring system. The grading will follow a Scoring System with four possible scores for retention from least (0) to best retention (3)
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 6, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2023

First Posted (Estimated)

December 11, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 11, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Edentulous Jaw

Clinical Trials on 0 degrees 3D printed upper complete dentures

Subscribe