Biting Force and Chewing Efficiency of Complete Dentures.

August 31, 2021 updated by: Nourhan Ahmed Ragheb, Kafrelsheikh University

Biting Force and Chewing Efficiency of Conventional and CAD/CAM Complete Dentures: A Cross-over Study

The aim of this study was to compare the MBF and chewing efficiency of complete denture bases fabricated by conventional, 3D printing and milling techniques. The research hypothesis was that, there are no significant differences in MBF and chewing efficiency in complete dentures fabricated by the three methods.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Participant selection and treatment This study will include a clinical experiment with a cross-over clinical trial design. For this study, 27completely edentulous participants with age range of 50-65 were selected from the outpatient clinic of the Removable Prosthodontic Department, Faculty of dentistry, Kafr Elsheikh University, Egypt. All participants had Angle class I jaw relation maxillomandibular relationship, normal alveolar ridge volume, no temporomandibular joint disorders, no heart disease, and no systemic diseases that affect the complete denture treatment procedures.

To reduce the effect of order of treatment on MBF, were successively given the following prosthesis i) complete dentures fabricated by the conventional technique ii) 3D printed complete dentures iii) milled complete dentures in a random order.

Construction of the CADCAM 3D printed denture The same steps of the conventional technique will be performed till the adjustment of occlusion rims then in the dental laboratory, the maxillary and mandibular definitive casts and the occlusal rims will be prepared for scanning with scan spray. Scanning will be performed with an optical 3D scanner . The files from the laser-scan will be translated into stereolithography (STL) files and the CDs are virtually designed in ExoCad software. After minor modifications in the positions of teeth were made, fabrication of the dentures will be approved and the digital denture base will be fabricated using 3D printing technique from Dental Pink resin

Construction of the CAD/CAM milled denture Once the complete denture has been virtually designed in CAD software (ExoCad software) a preview will be sent for evaluation using 3D viewing software. After minor modifications in the positions of teeth were made, fabrication of the dentures will be approved. The digital denture will be fabricated by the command software of the milling machine (ExoCad 5x milling machine) from prepolymerized resin acrylic pucks and the teeth (TSM Acetal Dental) were milled into template .After that the denture will be finished and polished according to the traditional procedures For all groups, after placement, clinical evaluations of the fit, retention, stability, occlusal relationship, esthetics, and phonetics were performed. Assessment of the occlusion was made with articulating paper, chairside adjustments were made and premature contacts were corrected. The patient was given a proper program for denture insertion and oral hygiene measures.

Assessment of biting force

  • This will be made by using a custom-made device composed of Flexiforce A 301® force sensor and Arduino microcontroller with a crystal display. The sensor is calibrated by known weight object for several times, and the sensor is covered by 3 mm layer of putty rubber base material.
  • Readings will be performed at 1 week, 1 month and 3 months follow-up periods. Assessment of chewing efficiency The chewing efficiency will be evaluated according to the procedure described by Schimmel et al. (2007) using a chewing gum. Specimens will be prepared from two colored gums one with the flavor "Sour Berry" (white color) and the other with the flavor "Fancy Fruit" (orange color). Two strips of a standard size (30 9 18 9 3 mm) will be cut from each gum and manually stuck together. Patients will be instructed to chew five samples of gum on their preferred chewing side for 5, 10, 20, 30 and 50 cycles, respectively. Between the different tests, an interval of at least 1 min will be imposed to reduce the effect of fatigue. The total duration of the experiments was approximately 8 min.

After chewing, the samples will be then spat into transparent plastic bags, which The samples will be then scanned from both sides with a of resolution 500 dots per inch. The numbers of selected pixels will be recorded from the histogram for each side, and mean of those figures will be calculated. To assess the reproducibility of chewing, the subjects will be available to repeat the experiments on a different day.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

27

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kafr Ash Shaykh, Egypt
        • Faculty of Dentistry , Kafr El Shiekh University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Angle class I jaw relation maxillomandibular relationship
  • Normal alveolar ridge volume
  • No temporomandibular joint disorders
  • No heart disease
  • No systemic diseases that affect the complete denture treatment procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Abnormal jaw relation
  • TMJ disorders
  • Any systemic disease interfering with complete denture treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: conventional complete denture
the patients receive conventional complete denture constructed from heat cure acrylic resin
the complete denture constructed by packing technique
Active Comparator: CADCAM 3D printed denture
the patients receiveCADCAM 3D printed denture constructed by using printing machine
The files from the laser-scan will be translated into stereolithography (STL) files and the CDs are virtually designed in ExoCad software
Active Comparator: CAD/CAM milled denture
the patients receiveCADCAM 3D printed denture constructed by using milling machine
Once the complete denture has been virtually designed in CAD software (ExoCad software) a preview will be sent for evaluation using 3D viewing software

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
biting force
Time Frame: Readings will be performed baseline 1 week after denture insertion then 1 month after denture insertion then 3 months after denture insertion.

- This is done custom-made device composed of Flexiforce A 301® force sensor and Arduino microcontroller with a crystal display. The sensor is calibrated by known weight object for several times, and the sensor is covered by 3 mm layer of putty rubber base material.

• The device was placed between the upper and lower first molar. The patient then was instructed to bite as hard as possible for a period of 3 s three times in succession, with at least 20 s of resting between each bite. The readings were recorded, and the average bite force was calculated

Readings will be performed baseline 1 week after denture insertion then 1 month after denture insertion then 3 months after denture insertion.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
chewing efficiency
Time Frame: 3 months after denture insertion
Specimens will be prepared from two colored gums one with the flavor "Sour Berry" (white color) and the other with the flavor "Fancy Fruit" (orange color). Two strips of a standard size (30 9 18 9 3 mm) will be cut from each gum and manually stuck together.
3 months after denture insertion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 20, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 15, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 2, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 24, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 11, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 5, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

mean and standard deviation for each outcome in each group

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chewing Problem

Clinical Trials on conventional complete denture

3
Subscribe