e-IMPAQc Systematic Assessment of Patient Reported Outcomes in Cancer Care (eIMPAQc)

December 4, 2023 updated by: Sylvie Lambert, St. Mary's Research Center, Canada

e-IMPAQc Implementation and Evaluation of a Mobile Application for the Systematic Assessment of Patient and Caregiver Reported Outcomes in Quebec Across the Cancer Continuum (eIMPAQc)

Purpose: The Electronic Implementation of Patient and Caregiver Reported Outcomes across cancer centres in Quebec project, or e-IMPAQc, was launched in 2017. e-IMPAQc's goal is to actively engage patients, their caregivers, healthcare professionals (HCPs), managers, policy makers, researchers and IT personnel to co-develop, implement, and evaluate an evidence-informed electronic patient-reported outcomes (e-PRO) screening and management program across Quebec.

Methods: e-IMPAQc built on the Improving Patient Experience and Health Outcomes Collaborative (iPEHOC) project, the first initiative in the province to implement e-PRO screening and was rolled out in three phases. e-IMPAQc has five main components: 1) primary and secondary standardized e-PRO questionnaires and algorithm; 2) summary report for clinicians with alert system; 3) summary report for patients, with tailored notifications regarding symptom severity; 4) self-management fact sheets library; and 5) clinical dashboard. Phase 1 included initiating change management and the co-development of the e-PRO algorithm with patients, their caregivers, HCPs, managers, policy makers, researchers and IT personnel (herein collectively referred as stakeholders) across seven cancer centres. The iPEHOC algorithm was used as a starting point given its successful implementation in one of the participating cancer centres for several years. Phase 1 also included feasibility work to establish a caregiver-reported outcomes (CROs) algorithm as well as the identification and configuration of appropriate electronic platforms on which to house e-IMPAQc. In Phase 2 the focus was on preparing for imminent implementation through workflow mapping and putting in place implementation support (e.g., site coordinators). A pilot of e-IMPAQc (excluding CROs) was also undertaken at one of the participating centres. In Phase 3, e-IMPAQc is being sequentially rolled out to as many cancer centres as possible and then evaluated. Qualitative and quantitative methods are used to document the process of implementation, patient and caregiver, and knowledge transfer (KT) outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

500

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3T1M5
        • St. Mary's Research Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Receiving cancer care at designated center

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to speak English or French
  • Unable to use email and internet

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Pre-implementation
Outcomes collected in patient populations prior to roll-out of the eIMPAQc
Experimental: Post-implementation
Outcomes collected in patient populations after roll-out of eIMPAQc
e-IMPAQc has five main components: 1) primary and secondary standardized e-PRO questionnaires and algorithm; 2) summary report for clinicians with alert system; 3) summary report for patients, with tailored notifications regarding symptom severity; 4) self-management fact sheets library; and 5) clinical dashboard.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Symptom severity
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 months
Symptom severity as measured by the population-specific eIMPAQc symptom screening algorithm, including the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Revised (ESAS-r) screening measures. Severity is measured on a scale of 0-10.
Baseline, 4 months
Patient perception of communication with health care team
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 months
6 item Clinician-patient communication subscale of the Primary Care Assessment Survey (PCAS), provides an overall score
Baseline, 4 months
Patient activation
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 months
13 items Patient Activation Measure provides an overall score
Baseline, 4 months
Quality of life
Time Frame: Bsaseline,4 months
The EQ-5D-5L is used to measure health related, quality of life. The scale measures quality of life on a 5-component scale including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each level is rated on scale that describes the degree of problems in that area.
Bsaseline,4 months
Emergency room visits
Time Frame: In the 18 months following consent
Using hospital administrative data, we will report on the number of individual visits to the emergency room
In the 18 months following consent
Survival
Time Frame: In the 18 months following consent
Incidence of mortality
In the 18 months following consent
Feasibility of using the eIMPAQc ePRO system in cancer care centres
Time Frame: Throughout the implementation period, over the course of each participants' 4-6 month follow-up period

Feasibility of using the eIMPAQc symptom screening and management program will be measured using the following metrics:

  • Rates of consent to use eIMPAQc among eligible patients referred/invited to patriciate
  • Rates of administration and completion of the eIMPAQc ePRO screening processes
  • Number and timing of withdrawals
  • Number of eIMPAQc ePRO screenings that generate an alert and/or clinical action

Metrics will be combined with qualitative data from semi-structured interviews with participants to provide an overall assessment of feasibility

Throughout the implementation period, over the course of each participants' 4-6 month follow-up period
Acceptability of using the eIMPAQc ePRO system in cancer care centres
Time Frame: Throughout the implementation period, over the course of each participants' 4-6 month follow-up period
Acceptability of the components of the eIMPAQc program will be assessed through a 40 item eIMPAQc acceptability questionnaire
Throughout the implementation period, over the course of each participants' 4-6 month follow-up period
Satisfaction
Time Frame: 4 months
Measured using the 8 item Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8)
4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 3, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 14, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

December 13, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SMHC 18-24

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Subscribe