- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06168435
e-IMPAQc Systematic Assessment of Patient Reported Outcomes in Cancer Care (eIMPAQc)
e-IMPAQc Implementation and Evaluation of a Mobile Application for the Systematic Assessment of Patient and Caregiver Reported Outcomes in Quebec Across the Cancer Continuum (eIMPAQc)
Purpose: The Electronic Implementation of Patient and Caregiver Reported Outcomes across cancer centres in Quebec project, or e-IMPAQc, was launched in 2017. e-IMPAQc's goal is to actively engage patients, their caregivers, healthcare professionals (HCPs), managers, policy makers, researchers and IT personnel to co-develop, implement, and evaluate an evidence-informed electronic patient-reported outcomes (e-PRO) screening and management program across Quebec.
Methods: e-IMPAQc built on the Improving Patient Experience and Health Outcomes Collaborative (iPEHOC) project, the first initiative in the province to implement e-PRO screening and was rolled out in three phases. e-IMPAQc has five main components: 1) primary and secondary standardized e-PRO questionnaires and algorithm; 2) summary report for clinicians with alert system; 3) summary report for patients, with tailored notifications regarding symptom severity; 4) self-management fact sheets library; and 5) clinical dashboard. Phase 1 included initiating change management and the co-development of the e-PRO algorithm with patients, their caregivers, HCPs, managers, policy makers, researchers and IT personnel (herein collectively referred as stakeholders) across seven cancer centres. The iPEHOC algorithm was used as a starting point given its successful implementation in one of the participating cancer centres for several years. Phase 1 also included feasibility work to establish a caregiver-reported outcomes (CROs) algorithm as well as the identification and configuration of appropriate electronic platforms on which to house e-IMPAQc. In Phase 2 the focus was on preparing for imminent implementation through workflow mapping and putting in place implementation support (e.g., site coordinators). A pilot of e-IMPAQc (excluding CROs) was also undertaken at one of the participating centres. In Phase 3, e-IMPAQc is being sequentially rolled out to as many cancer centres as possible and then evaluated. Qualitative and quantitative methods are used to document the process of implementation, patient and caregiver, and knowledge transfer (KT) outcomes.
Study Overview
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Quebec
-
Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3T1M5
- St. Mary's Research Centre
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Receiving cancer care at designated center
Exclusion Criteria:
- Unable to speak English or French
- Unable to use email and internet
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Pre-implementation
Outcomes collected in patient populations prior to roll-out of the eIMPAQc
|
|
|
Experimental: Post-implementation
Outcomes collected in patient populations after roll-out of eIMPAQc
|
e-IMPAQc has five main components: 1) primary and secondary standardized e-PRO questionnaires and algorithm; 2) summary report for clinicians with alert system; 3) summary report for patients, with tailored notifications regarding symptom severity; 4) self-management fact sheets library; and 5) clinical dashboard.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Symptom severity
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 months
|
Symptom severity as measured by the population-specific eIMPAQc symptom screening algorithm, including the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Revised (ESAS-r) screening measures.
Severity is measured on a scale of 0-10.
|
Baseline, 4 months
|
|
Patient perception of communication with health care team
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 months
|
6 item Clinician-patient communication subscale of the Primary Care Assessment Survey (PCAS), provides an overall score
|
Baseline, 4 months
|
|
Patient activation
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 months
|
13 items Patient Activation Measure provides an overall score
|
Baseline, 4 months
|
|
Quality of life
Time Frame: Bsaseline,4 months
|
The EQ-5D-5L is used to measure health related, quality of life.
The scale measures quality of life on a 5-component scale including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
Each level is rated on scale that describes the degree of problems in that area.
|
Bsaseline,4 months
|
|
Emergency room visits
Time Frame: In the 18 months following consent
|
Using hospital administrative data, we will report on the number of individual visits to the emergency room
|
In the 18 months following consent
|
|
Survival
Time Frame: In the 18 months following consent
|
Incidence of mortality
|
In the 18 months following consent
|
|
Feasibility of using the eIMPAQc ePRO system in cancer care centres
Time Frame: Throughout the implementation period, over the course of each participants' 4-6 month follow-up period
|
Feasibility of using the eIMPAQc symptom screening and management program will be measured using the following metrics:
Metrics will be combined with qualitative data from semi-structured interviews with participants to provide an overall assessment of feasibility |
Throughout the implementation period, over the course of each participants' 4-6 month follow-up period
|
|
Acceptability of using the eIMPAQc ePRO system in cancer care centres
Time Frame: Throughout the implementation period, over the course of each participants' 4-6 month follow-up period
|
Acceptability of the components of the eIMPAQc program will be assessed through a 40 item eIMPAQc acceptability questionnaire
|
Throughout the implementation period, over the course of each participants' 4-6 month follow-up period
|
|
Satisfaction
Time Frame: 4 months
|
Measured using the 8 item Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8)
|
4 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- SMHC 18-24
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cancer
-
Cellworks Group Inc.RecruitingCancer | Relapsed Cancer | Refractory CancerUnited States
-
University of Michigan Rogel Cancer CenterCompletedCancer Liver | Cancer Brain | Cancer Head &Neck | Cancer PelvisUnited States
-
Yale UniversityNational Institute of Nursing Research (NINR); The Glimpse Group IncRecruitingCancer | Adolescent Cancer | Young Adult CancerUnited States
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesNational Cancer Institute (NCI); Atrium Health Wake Forest BaptistRecruitingCancer | Adolescent Cancer | Young Adult CancerUnited States
-
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer CenterEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsCompletedAdvanced Cancer | Relapsed Cancer | Refractory CancerUnited States
-
City of Hope Medical CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedStage III Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IV Gastric Cancer | Stage IVA Colorectal Cancer | Stage IVA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IVB Colorectal Cancer | Stage IVB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIIA Gastric Cancer | Stage IIIB Gastric Cancer | Stage IIIC Gastric... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversityNot yet recruitingCancer | Solid Cancer
-
New Mexico Cancer Research AllianceOhio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center...RecruitingCancer | Cancer RiskUnited States
-
Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaCompletedCancer | Childhood CancerUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoBristol-Myers Squibb; PfizerTerminatedStage IIIA Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer | Metastatic Colorectal Adenocarcinoma | Metastatic Colon Adenocarcinoma | Metastatic Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage IIIA Colon Cancer | Stage IIIB Colon Cancer | Stage IIIC Colon Cancer | Stage IV Colon Cancer | Stage IV Rectal... and other conditionsUnited States