A Personalized Nutrition Intervention for Adolescent Depression (TeenDietMDD)

January 9, 2024 updated by: Daphne Korczak, The Hospital for Sick Children

A Personalized Nutrition Intervention for Adolescent Depression: A Mixed-Methods Pilot

This study is being done to test the feasibility of a personalized nutrition eating plan in adolescents with depression. Evidence suggests that dietary quality may affect an individual's mood. A healthy diet includes vegetables, fruit, nuts, seeds, and olive oil, as well as minimally processed whole grains, legumes, and moderate amounts of lean meat, fish, and dairy.

The investigators will examine the feasibility of a personalized nutrition eating plan for children and youth with depression. Previous research has shown that it helps improve depressive symptoms in adults, but it is not clear if the same is true for children and youth.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The proposed 8-week, mixed-methods, single-arm study aims to examine the feasibility of an adjunctive personalized dietary intervention for adolescents with major depressive disorder. The secondary aims are to determine potential barriers and facilitators of implementation and to improve adherence and uptake.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1X8
        • The Hospital for Sick Children

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosis of MDD as determined by semi-structured diagnostic interview
  • access to the internet and a computer or smart phone
  • presence of a parent who is willing to participate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • adherent to a high-quality diet at baseline
  • presence of an eating disorder, as determined by semi-structured diagnostic interview
  • currently participating in other dietary programs or studies
  • actively attempting to increase or decrease body weight;
  • presence of a chronic medical condition;
  • unstable psychiatric condition (e.g., mania, active suicidal ideation)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Personalized Nutrition
This group will receive the nutrition intervention
Four nutrition counselling sessions conducted over eight weeks, in conjunction with food items to assist in meal preparation and with weekly educational information messages sent via email.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of the Intervention
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks
Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM). The FIM is a self-reported four-item measure scored using a five-point Likert scale ranging from 'completely disagree' (1) to 'completely agree' (5) with higher scores indicating greater acceptability or feasibility. Higher scores indicate greater feasibility with a maximum score of 20.
Baseline, 9 weeks
Acceptability of the Intervention
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM). The AIM is a self-reported four-item measure scored using a five-point Likert scale ranging from 'completely disagree' (1) to 'completely agree' (5) with higher scores indicating greater acceptability or feasibility. Higher scores indicate greater acceptability with a maximum score of 20.
Baseline, 9 weeks
Feasibility, Acceptability, and Satisfaction of the Intervention
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks
Feasibility, Acceptability, and Satisfaction are also assessed using semi-structured qualitative interviews pre- and post-study intervention.
Baseline, 9 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Depression symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline, 5 weeks, 9 weeks
Depression symptoms are assessed using the Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for Children (CES-DC), a validated 20-item self-report measure. Participants rated their symptoms on a four-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating more severe depression symptoms, and a maximum total score of 60.
Baseline, 5 weeks, 9 weeks
Dietary Assessment
Time Frame: Baseline, 5 weeks, 9 weeks
Adolescents' adherence to the personalized nutrition intervention is assessed using the Mediterranean Diet Quality Index for children and adolescents (KIDMED) questionnaire, a 16-item self- or interviewer-administered measure. Scores range from 0-12. A total score of ≤ 3 indicates poor adherence; a score of 4-7 indicates moderate adherence; a score of ≥8 indicates high adherence.
Baseline, 5 weeks, 9 weeks
Nutrition Attitudes and Knowledge questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks
Nutrition attitudes and knowledge are assessed using a Nutrition Attitudes and Knowledge questionnaire, designed to evaluate children's understanding of the 2019 Canada Food Guide (CFG). The questionnaire consists of four five-point Likert scale questions to measure positive attitudes about nutrition with higher scores indicating a stronger belief that healthy eating is important and a maximum score of 20. Additionally, 20 multiple-choice and true/false questions relate to CFG food groups (Drinks, Whole Grain Foods, Vegetables and Fruit, and Protein Foods). Higher scores indicate greater nutrition knowledge and the maximum possible score is also 20.
Baseline, 9 weeks
Parent Food Modelling:
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks
Parental food modelling is evaluated with 10 items adapted from Cullen's scale, each rated on a four-point Likert scale from 'Never' (0) to 'Always' (3) which has been used to predict diet outcomes in adolescent samples. Higher scores signify greater healthful parental food modeling, with a maximum score of 30.
Baseline, 9 weeks
Satisfaction with menu planning
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks
Satisfaction with menu planning is evaluated through a single item, independently assessed by parents and adolescents using a five-point Likert scale that ranges from 'very dissatisfied' (1) to 'very satisfied' (5).
Baseline, 9 weeks
Satisfaction with nutrition counselling sessions
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 weeks
Satisfaction with nutrition counseling sessions is evaluated through a single item, independently assessed by parents and adolescents using a five-point Likert scale that ranges from 'very dissatisfied' (1) to 'very satisfied' (5).
Baseline, 9 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 15, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 8, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 8, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

December 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 11, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • TeenDiet_Dep

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Dietary Intervention

Subscribe