Comparison of Supraglottic Airway Devices in EBUS (SAD-EBUS)

May 7, 2025 updated by: Derya Guzelkaya, Ankara Etlik City Hospital

Comparison of Efficacy and Complications of Three Supraglottic Airway Devices in Endobronchial Ultrasonographic Transbronchial Needle Aspiration Anesthesia

Supraglottic airway devices (SAD) provide ventilation of patients requiring respiratory support without tracheal intubation. Therefore, SAD is used to maintain airway during anesthesia in surgeries that do not require intubation. The classical laryngeal mask (cLMA, Intavent Direct, Maidenhead, UK) is an SAD that is available as a more advanced airway method than mask ventilation and a less invasive method than endotracheal intubation. It is used by placing it over the glottis at the level of the larynx and inflating the cuff. The Proseal laryngeal mask (LMA-Proseal™, PLMA, Intavent Orthofix, Maidenhead, UK) is the first supraglottic airway device that is suitable for reuse and includes a gastric drainage channel. I-gel™ (Intersurgical Ltd, Wokingham, UK) is a second-generation laryngeal mask with a soft, gel-like thermoplastic elastomer distal end and no inflatable cuff, designed not to compress the anatomical structures of the larynx and pharynx.

Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) has become one of the most important invasive diagnostic procedures for pulmonologists and thoracic surgeons. It is a safe and effective technique for sampling hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes and masses. It is currently accepted as the first choice for histological sampling of the mediastinum in lung cancer staging.

The use of SAD to secure the airway in patients undergoing EBUS-TBNA has the advantages of being less invasive than endotracheal intubation and providing better surgical field access.

Classical LMA, proseal LMA and I-gel are routinely used airway methods during EBUS-TBNA procedure.

The aim of this study is to compare the routinely used SADs in anesthesia management in patients undergoing endobronchial ultrasonography-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in terms of intraoperative efficacy and postoperative complications.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The parameters to be recorded are: demographic characteristics of the patients, hemodynamic data during and after the procedure, ventilation variables (tidal volume, airway pressures, leak volume), the number of attempts to place the SAD, the need for intubation, the presence of sore throat, nausea and vomiting after the procedure. In addition, the operator performing the procedure will be asked to evaluate the convenience of the procedure.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

183

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ankara, Turkey, 06010
        • Etlik City Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients undergoing Endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adults ageing 18-80 years
  • patients in ASA phyical class
  • patients undergoing Endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients undergoing emergent procedure
  • pediatric patients
  • patients having upper airway pathology
  • patients in risk of aspiration

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Group I
Airway is secured with LMA classic
Airway is secured with LMA clasic
Group II
Airway is secured with LMA proseal
Airway is secured with LMA proseal
Group III
Airway is secured with I-gel
Airway is secured with I-gel

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of fiberoptic view
Time Frame: 3 minutes after anesthesia induction
The operator will score the view of the glottic opening according to the Cormack Lehanne score
3 minutes after anesthesia induction

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ease of passage through glottic opening
Time Frame: 3 minutes after anesthesia induction
The operator will score theEase of passage through glottic opening according to a Likert scale
3 minutes after anesthesia induction
Ease of SAD insertion
Time Frame: 2 minutes after anesthesia induction
The anesthetist will score the ease of SAD insertion a 5 point scale
2 minutes after anesthesia induction
Complications
Time Frame: 1 minute after extubation
Airway trauma as indicated with blood stain on SAD or visible bleeding in the airway
1 minute after extubation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Derya Güzelkaya, Dr, Ankara Etlik City Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 11, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

December 20, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 11, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 7, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SAD-EBUS Derya

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Diseases

Clinical Trials on LMA classic

Subscribe