The Effect of a New Supraglottic Airway With Built-in Cuff Pressure Indicator

February 25, 2013 updated by: University Health Network, Toronto

The Effect of a New Supraglottic Airway With Built-in Cuff Pressure Indicator on Postoperative Pharyngolaryngeal Adverse Events: A Prospective, Randomized Trial

The study compares the incidence of pharyngolaryngeal complications in patients managed with either a pressure-limiting strategy using the AES Ultra CPVTM or a standard practice using a LMA, in ambulatory surgery patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Recent evidence suggests that reduction of LMA intracuff pressure may decrease the incidence of pharyngolaryngeal symptoms. Yet, pressure manometers are not widely available limiting the application of a strategy of intracuff pressure reduction. The Ultra airway has been designed to provide continuous indication of intracuff pressure and can limit the intracuff pressure to < 60 cm H2O. This study compares the incidence of pharyngolaryngeal complications in patients managed with either a pressure-limiting strategy using the Ultra or a standard practice using a LMA, in ambulatory surgery patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

170

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5T2S8
        • Univeristy Health Network- Toronto Western Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III
  • 18 to 65 years of age
  • Ambulatory patients scheduled to undergo knee arthroscopy, transurethral resection of bladder tumor, hand, gynecological, general surgical and eye procedures under a short general anesthesia of less than 2 hours
  • Spontaneously breathing on the LMA

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Reduced mouth opening less than 2.5cm
  • Recent history of upper respiratory tract infection and sore throats
  • Contraindications of LMA use (Morbid obesity with body mass index greater than 40kg/m2, symptomatic hiatus hernia, esophageal reflux disease)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: The laryngeal mask airway-ClassicTM (LMA)
The LMA is a large foreign body that exerts pressure on the pharyngeal mucosa. High LMA intracuff pressures may reduce pharyngeal mucosal perfusion and lead to throat discomfort.
Other Names:
  • The laryngeal mask airway-Classic
Active Comparator: The AES Ultra CPVTM LMA (Ultra)
Ultra is a new supraglottic airway with anatomical features and insertion technique virtually identical to the LMA-ClassicTM. The cuff and the shaft are made of silicone with a built-in CPV pilot balloon valve which provides continuous monitoring of the intracuff pressure. The CPV cuff pressure indicator has 3 zones indicated by color: yellow corresponds to pressure < 50 cm H2O; green 60 cm H2O; and red >70 cm H2O
Ultra
Other Names:
  • AES Ultra CPVTM LMA (Ultra)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The primary outcome, composite pharyngolaryngeal complication, is defined as the presence of either sore throat, dysphonia or dysphagia at 1, 2, and 24 h postoperatively.
Time Frame: 1, 2, 24 hours
1, 2, 24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intracuff pressure
Time Frame: intraoperative
Intracuff pressure intraoperative 10 post insertion
intraoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 8, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

February 27, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 27, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2013

Last Verified

February 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 11-0392-A

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on LMA

3
Subscribe