Threads Insertion in Forehead Static Wrinkles

December 24, 2023 updated by: Norhan Anees, Zagazig University

Efficacy of Polydioxanone Threads for Forehead Wrinkle Correction

The main objective of this study is to analyze the efficacy and safety of PDO threads in correcting deep static wrinkles on the upper face.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The upper face is a complex and dynamic part of the face, which conveys facial expression and emotion. As one age, youthful dynamic facial lines on the forehead and glabella change to static wrinkles, which remain on the face at rest. These permanent wrinkles can lead to the appearance of fatigue and negative facial expressions such as anger, which may influence psychological wellbeing, social confidence, and self-esteem.

The two major factors involved in the formation of static wrinkles in the upper face are repetitive muscle contraction and aging (loss of dermal collagen and matrix material leading to reduced dermal support). Compared with other facial muscles, the frontalis and corrugator muscles usually retain their muscle volume and even undergo hypertrophy to compensate for age-related ptosis and loss in visual acuity, which intensify the wrinkles.

Botulinum toxin and filler injections are currently the main treatment modalities in the management of facial wrinkles, especially for those on the upper third of the face. Conceptually, botulinum toxin addresses wrinkles by relaxing the muscles responsible for their creation (ie, the"dynamic" component), while soft tissue fillers provide necessary volume for the effacement of facial rhytids (ie, the "static" component). Although popular and widely accepted by the general population, some hesitate to receive toxin or filler injections due to the potential risk of unnatural facial expression, ptosis (associated with botulinum toxin), skin necrosis, and vision loss (from filler injection).

This has created a demand for a minimally invasive technique with reduced side effects, where threads may be considered. Although more commonly known as a mean for facial lifting, polydioxanone (PDO) suture materials have been applied to static wrinkles with promising outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Zagazig, Egypt
        • Zagazig University Hospitals

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult females and males between 30 and 65 years of age seeking treatment for static wrinkles on forehead.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Patients who received filler injection within a period of 12 months before thread insertion and during the follow-up period.

    • Patients with a history of plastic surgery on the face.
    • Visible scars that may affect evaluation of a response and/or quality of photography and previous botulinum toxin treatment within the prior 12 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group A
received Botox then threads
patients in which Botox injection then threads insertion were used
Active Comparator: Group B
received threads insertion only
patients in which threads insertion only was used

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
improvement in wrinkles
Time Frame: 2 months after the procedure
a Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as follows: 1: no change; 2: improved; 3: much improved; 4: very much improved.
2 months after the procedure
patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 2 months after the procedure
using the following scale: excellent, very good, good, fair
2 months after the procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

November 15, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 19, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

December 21, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 24, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • forehead wrinkles

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Wrinkle

Clinical Trials on Botox then threads

Subscribe