A Retrospective Review Evaluating the Matrix Pro Applicator for Treatment of Wrinkles

March 26, 2024 updated by: Candela Corporation
This is a retrospective chart review of data from the multi-site prospective clinical trial, "Functional Usability and Feasibility Testing of the Profound Matrix™ System (FUFT2002)" to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Profound Matrix System Matrix Pro applicator for the treatment of wrinkles.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This was a retrospective medical record review of subject data from the source study FUFT2002 to evaluate the safety, efficacy, tolerability, and usability of the Profound MatrixTM System with the Matrix Pro Applicator for the treatment of wrinkles.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Yoqne'am 'Illit, Israel
        • Syneron Medical
    • Massachusetts
      • Marlborough, Massachusetts, United States, 01752
        • Candela Institue for Excellence

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Met eligibility criteria under source study FUFT2002 and enrolled into FUFT2002 study (NCT # pending).
  2. Received full face treatment with 27W Matrix Pro applicator only.
  3. Have baseline and follow-up assessments obtained.
  4. Have photography obtained with the VISIA standardized camera system (Appendix III).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Sun exposure during the course of the study.
  2. Aesthetic procedures and/or treatments during the course of the study.
  3. Any violation of study treatment instructions.
  4. Upon inspection, any differences in baseline and follow up photos that would not make evaluation of photos viable (e.g. chin placement, facial expression).
  5. Any protocol deviation or change in study visit activities that would jeopardize reliability or validity of the retrospective review

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Matrix Pro Applicator
Source study subjects received up to three (3) full-face treatments for wrinkles with Matrix Pro Applicator (27W)
The source study consisted of up to three treatment visits with treatment intervals 6 weeks ± 2 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement in facial wrinkles
Time Frame: Approximately 6 months following baseline assessment
Improvement in the appearance of wrinkles was assessed by three (3) blinded evaluators comparing photographs taken at Baseline/Pre-treatment and at the 3-month follow-up (post final treatment)
Approximately 6 months following baseline assessment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subject Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)
Time Frame: Approximately 6 months following baseline assessment
Assessment of Subject Assessment of Improvement via GAIS ratings at the study endpoint (3MFU) using a 5-point scale (-1= worse to 3= very much improved)
Approximately 6 months following baseline assessment
Subject Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)
Time Frame: Approximately 4 months following baseline assessment
Assessment of Subject Assessment of Improvement via GAIS ratings at follow up timepoint using a 5-point scale (-1= worse to 3= very much improved)
Approximately 4 months following baseline assessment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Konika Patel Schallen, MD, Candela Medical

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 29, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 29, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 21, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 27, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MXP23001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Wrinkle

Clinical Trials on Profound Matrix

3
Subscribe