Performance of PEAR 2.0 Software in Prescribing Biotherapy in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

August 4, 2025 updated by: CEN Biotech

Performance Study of PEAR 2.0 Software in Prescribing Biotherapy in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

The management of rheumatoid arthritis is based on the prescription of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) to induce clinical and biological remission. If the first line of treatment (methotrexate) fails, a biotherapy may be prescribed. In daily practice, the initiation of a targeted therapy must therefore be based on the prescriber's expertise or qualification in terms of his or her level of experience in the diagnosis and management of chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis. As the therapeutic arsenal has expanded, so has the question of choosing the right treatment for the right patient at the right time. At present, in daily practice, there is no tool to help clinicians predict treatment efficacy. The choice of biotherapy based on efficacy carries relatively little weight, firstly because this choice is made in relation to other biotherapies, and secondly because there are no superiority studies that have actually demonstrated greater efficacy in favor of one of the targeted therapies. In the age of Big Data, artificial intelligence can be used to develop algorithms for predicting treatment response. mYXpression has developed medical decision support software based on the integration of transcriptomic markers to assess the probability of response and/or non-response to biotherapies for each patient. The algorithm's performance was theoretically tested by retrospectively collecting transcriptomic data and clinical responses to 6 biotherapies from 992 patients included in 17 clinical trials or cohorts. The aim of this observational study is to demonstrate the value of PEAR 2.0 medical decision support software in the management of rheumatoid arthritis patients who are candidates for biotherapy.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Detailed Description

This study plans to include 234 patients who, like you, suffer from rheumatoid arthritis, and who will initiate biotherapy in one of the hospital departments taking part in this research. The main objective is to demonstrate the performance of the PEAR 2.0 decision support software, i.e. to show that the software's recommendations for achieving remission are accurate and reliable. The other objectives are to collect data that could help the algorithm evolve, and to provide other information such as the probability of achieving a reduction in rheumatoid arthritis activity in patients who have failed several biotherapies.

Because the software must first demonstrate its reliability, the investigator will not use it and will prescribe the biotherapy he thinks is best suited to his patient. The software's results will be communicated to the investigator at the consultation scheduled 6 months after the start of the biotherapy.

During two consultations (before the start of biotherapy and 6 months after the first day of biotherapy), the investigator will collect the data needed for the study and which describe the disease. These data are either present in the patient's medical record or are usually collected during consultations in the rheumatology department.

For the purposes of the study, at the first visit, the investigator will prescribe a blood sample (10 ml) to be taken at the hospital laboratory before starting the biotherapy. This sample will be used to analyze the biological markers (transcriptome) that the software algorithm uses to establish its recommendations.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

239

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Dijon, France, 21000
        • University Hospital of Dijon
      • Lille, France, 59037
        • Hôpital Roger Salengro University Hospital of Lille
      • Orleans, France, 45100
        • Hospital of Orleans
      • Saint-priest-en-jarez, France, 42270
        • University Hospital of Saint-Etienne

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients treated in rheumatology hospital wards

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female 18 years or older ;
  • With severe rheumatoid arthritis (DAS 28 ≥ 5.1) or moderate rheumatoid arthritis (DAS 28 3.2 ≥ and <5.1);
  • For whom one of the 6 biotherapies Etanercept, Adalimumab, Infliximab, Rituximab, Tocilizumab, Abatacept, or respective biosimilars, is planned, and accepting treatment after having been duly informed of the risks and benefits of the biotherapy;
  • Agreeing to the collection of an additional volume of blood for transcriptomic analysis;
  • Having given their free, informed and express written consent;
  • Affiliated with a French social security scheme.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Biotherapies not analyzed by RITI (Certolizumab, Golimumab, Anakinra, Sarilumab);
  • Combination of biotherapies or combination with a tsDMARD);
  • Patients under judicial protection (curatorship, guardianship, safeguard of justice) or patients with psychotic disorders unable to complete quality of life and assessment questionnaires;
  • Already included in an interventional study or in the exclusion period of an interventional study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients' study
Patient with planned biotherapy
Single additional volume of blood (10 ml) to be collected using the PAXgene system at the same time as the routine blood test before starting biotherapy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prediction of the Individualized Therapeutic Information Report (RITI)
Time Frame: 6 months

Concordance rate (Kappa) between responder/non-responder rates to biotherapy (actual result) and those predicted by the RITI orientation score (theoretical result).

A responder to the prescribed biotherapy is a patient in remission 6 months after initiation of treatment. Clinical and biological remission is defined as a DAS 28 (Disease Activity Score) < 2.6.

6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Determinants of biotherapy choice
Time Frame: Day 0
Description of clinical, biological and human criteria (patient preferences) taken into account in the choice of biotherapy prescribed during the inclusion visit.
Day 0
Opinion of the investigator on RITI
Time Frame: 6 months
Description of the opinion of the investigator with the RITI prediction
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 5, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 13, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 27, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

January 2, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 6, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • C1708

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

The study protocol and report will be shared if the results are not published.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Polyarthritis; Rheumatoid

Clinical Trials on Patients with planned biotherapy

Subscribe