STep-up and Step-down Therapeutic Strategies in Childhood ARthritiS (STARS)

October 9, 2024 updated by: Alessandro Consolaro, Istituto Giannina Gaslini

Comparison of STep-up and Step-down Therapeutic Strategies in Childhood ARthritiS

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of a conventional therapeutic regimen, based on treatment escalation (step-up strategy) and driven by the treat-to-target approach, with that of an early aggressive intervention based on the initial start of a combination of conventional and biological DMARDs (step-down strategy).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Although their approach is different, both interventions are aimed to obtain a quick and robust disease control and to maintain it over time. Compelling evidence exists that in children with chronic arthritis early intensive therapy may take advantage of the so-called "window of opportunity", in which the biology of the disease can be altered to improve long-term disease outcomes, including prevention of cumulative joint damage. Recent experiences in children with systemic JIA have shown that early anti-IL-1 therapy may lead to rapid achievement of inactive disease and allow early treatment discontinuation without disease relapses in many patients. The benefits of early treatment with biologic agents in other JIA categories are less clear, but convincing evidence has been recently reported for polyarthritis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

260

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • GE
      • Genova, GE, Italy, 16147

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria

Each patient must meet all the following criteria in order to be enrolled in the trial:

I. Newly-diagnosed and synthetic or biologic DMARD-naïve children (only treatment with 1 NSAID is allowed and no corticosteroid joint injections prior to randomization ) with a JIA classified according to the following ILAR categories:

i. Oligoarthritis ii. Rheumatoid factor negative polyarthritis

II. Active arthritis

III. Onset of JIA symptoms no more than 6 months before randomization

IV. Age 2 to 17 years at enrolment.

V. Female of child-bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test at the beginning of the trial. If sexually active, they must agree to use highly effective contraceptive measures, throughout study participation, and must have no intention of conceiving during the course of the study. Post-pubertal males must have no plans to father a child during the study and agree to use highly effective contraceptive measures if sexually active.

VI. Ability to comply with the entire study procedures, ability to communicate meaningfully with the investigational staff, competence to give written informed consent; to be applied to the parents and/or patients, as appropriate

VII. Duly executed, written, informed consent/assent obtained from the parents/patient.

Exclusion criteria

I. Classification in one of the following JIA categories: systemic arthritis, RF-positive polyarthritis, psoriatic arthritis, enthesitis-related arthritis, undifferentiated arthritis

II. Patients who need systemic treatment for uveitis

III. Tuberculosis related issues: patients are excluded from the study if they have:

  1. Active TB or a history of incompletely treated TB
  2. PPD or QuantiFERON-TB positive patients (with no active disease) unless it is documented by a specialist that the patient has been adequately treated for TB and can start treatment with a biologic agent, based on the medical judgment of the study investigator and / or an infectious disease specialist.
  3. Suspected extrapulmonary TB infection
  4. Patients at high risk of contracting TB, such as close contact with individual with active or latent TB

IV. Previous treatment with any synthetic or biologic DMARD

V. Any live attenuated vaccine within 4 weeks prior to the baseline visit, such as varicella-zoster, oral polio, measles, mumps or rubella vaccines and throughout the study. Killed or inactive vaccine may be permitted based on the investigator's judgment

VI. Prior or current history of malignancy or any other significant concomitant illness(es) as per the treating physician evaluation

VII. Any of the following laboratory abnormalities based on the most recent laboratory results:

  1. White blood cell (WBC) count <3.50 x 103/mm3 (SI units: <3.50 x 109/L) and neutrophils < 1x109/L;
  2. Hemoglobin < 8.5 g/dL (SI units: <85 g/L);
  3. Platelet Count < 125,0000/mm3 or ≥1,000,000/mm3 (SI units: <125 x 109/L or ≥1,000 x 109/L
  4. Aspartate aminotransaminase (AST) or alanine aminotransaminase (ALT) ≥ 2.0 x upper limit of normal (ULN).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Treatment arm 1: Step-up
JIA patients managed with a Treat-To-Target strategy (T2T)
Experimental: Treatment arm 2: Step-down
JIA patients treated with an early combined therapy
Patients will receive etanercept subcutaneously at a dose of 0.8 mg/kg weekly (up to a maximum dose of 50 mg weekly).
Other Names:
  • ETN
Methotrexate will be administered subcutaneously, in a single weekly dose of 15 mg/m2 (max 20 mg).
Other Names:
  • MTX
Triamcinolone hexacetonide and methylprednisolone acetate doses depend on the affected joint.
Other Names:
  • IACI

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical remission on or off medication at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
The effectiveness of the two therapeutic strategies will be compared by assessing the frequency of clinical remission (CR) at 12 months. CR is defined as the persistence of the JADAS state of ID for at least 6 months.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Inactive disease
Time Frame: 12 months
The rate of patients who achieve the JADAS/JIA ACR state of ID at any single point in time throughout the study period will be compared between the 2 arms.
12 months
Time to inactive disease as per JADAS/JIA ACR criteria
Time Frame: 12 months
Time to achieve the state of JADAS/JIA ACR ID will be calculated as the time difference (in days) between the date of randomization and the date of the visit at which the patient will be observed to be in ID.
12 months
Time to JADAS/JIA ACR clinical remission
Time Frame: 12 months
Time to achieve the state of JADAS/JIA ACR ID will be calculated as the time difference (in days) between the date of randomization and the date of the visit at which the patient will be observed to be in clinical remission (i.e. persistent inactive disease for at least 6 months).
12 months
Time spent in JADAS/JIA ACR inactive disease
Time Frame: 12 months
The cumulative time spent in the JADAS/JIA ACR state of ID will be calculated as the time difference (in days) between the date of the first visit at which the patient will be observed to be in ID and the date at which he/she will be observed to be no longer in ID that is when the disease will flare (see later for definitions), or database closure for analysis purposes. We will assume that if a patient is found to be in ID at 2 consecutive visits, the patient had ID on all days between these visits. If a patient will be found to have ID at a particular visit, but lost the ID status at the subsequent visit, the patient will be considered to have been in ID until the recurrence of active disease. Patients found to be in ID only at the time of database closure will contribute a single day of ID. The time in inactive disease per patient will be recorded and compared between the 2 arms.
12 months
Cumulative level of disease activity throughout the study period
Time Frame: 12 months
The area under the curve (AUC) of the JADAS10 score assessed at every study visit and the AUC of the parent version of the JADAS (parJADAS) assessed monthly will be recorded and compared between the 2 arms.
12 months
Time spent on therapy
Time Frame: 12 months
The cumulative time on therapy will be calculated as the time difference (in days) between the date of the visit at which the patient will start a systemic medication (synthetic or biologic DMARDs or steroids) until the date at which he/she will be observed to no longer be in treatment with a systemic medication, or completed the study. We assume that if a patient does not receive medications at 2 consecutive visits, the patient had not received medications all days between these visits. Patients initiating a systemic treatment at the final visit of the study will contribute a single day of time in therapy. The mean percentage of time spent on therapy per patient will be recorded and compared between the 2 arms.
12 months
Rate of flares
Time Frame: 12 months
The rate of patients who develop flare, defined as the recurrence of active disease after attaining inactive disease at last visit according JADAS or JIA ACR definition, and the number of flares and the time to flare per patient will be recorded and compared. Notably, all patients prescribed intra-articular injections, synthetic or biologic DMARDs or systemic steroids will be considered as flare independently from JADAS or ACR criteria.
12 months
Rate of uveitis onset
Time Frame: 12 months
The rate of patients who develop uveitis according to the Standardized Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) will be recorded and compared between the 2 arms. The rate of patients requiring systemic medications for treatment of uveitis will be also recorded and compared between the 2 arms. However, these patients will be excluded from the study and followed for safety only.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 29, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 28, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 28, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 31, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 2, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Oligoarthritis, Juvenile

Clinical Trials on Etanercept

Subscribe