PRT Versus CBT on Chronic Non Specific LBP

January 10, 2024 updated by: Nosaiba Ahmed fahmy Eissa, Cairo University

Positional Release Technique Versus Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Chronic Non Specific Low Back Pain

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare between the effect of positional release technique and cognitive behavioral therapy in patients with chronic non specific low back pain.

The main question aims to answer :Is there any differences of using positional release techniques versus cognitive behavioral therapy on patients with chronic low back pain?

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Design of the study :

Pretest-posttest randomized controlled trial.

Subjects selection :

sixty patients their age between 25-45 years of both genders with chronic non specific low back pain will participate in this study according tosample size calculation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • New Damietta
      • Damietta, New Damietta, Egypt
        • Recruiting
        • Horus University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients will be clinically diagnosed with chronic non specific low back pain .
  • Their ages will range from 20to40years old.
  • body mass index will range from 18 to 30 kg/cm².
  • Cognitive score will be 23 or above .
  • Voluntary acceptance of participation in this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lumbar canal stenosis
  • Lumbar discogenic lesions
  • Lumbar infections,tumors.arthiritis
  • Patients with decreased range of motion due to congenital anamolies.
  • Cognitive and emotional disturbances

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: positional release
positional release techniques in addition to conventional physical therapy
positional release techniques in addition to conventional therapy two sessions per week for 6 weeks
Experimental: cognitive behavioral therapy
cognitive behavioral therapy in addition to conventional physical therapy
cognitive behavioral therapy in addition to conventional therapy two sessions per week for 6 weeks
Active Comparator: conventional physical therapy
conventional physical therapy in control group
positional release techniques in addition to conventional therapy two sessions per week for 6 weeks
cognitive behavioral therapy in addition to conventional therapy two sessions per week for 6 weeks
conventional therapy two sessions for 6 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pressure algometer
Time Frame: pre intervention and immediately after intervention
change in pain pressure threshold .with unit of measurement kg/cm2
pre intervention and immediately after intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the arabic version of oswestry disability questionnaire
Time Frame: pre intervention and immediately after intervention
the patients choose one out of six senteces 10 multiple choise questions for back pain higher scores indicate great pain
pre intervention and immediately after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nosaiba Eissa, Cairo University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 18, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

January 10, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PRT V CBT IN CNLBP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on positional release technique

Subscribe