MCG as a Noninvasive Diagnostic Strategy for Suspected INOCA (MICRO2) (MICRO2)

July 7, 2025 updated by: Genetesis Inc.

Magnetocardiography as a Noninvasive Diagnostic Strategy for Suspected Myocardial Ischemia With No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

A prospective, multicenter, observational, single-arm trial to validate CardioFlux MCG's ability to diagnose myocardial ischemia caused by coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with suspected ischemia and confirmed no obstructive coronary artery disease (suspected INOCA) by using diagnostic measures of coronary flow reserve (CFR) via invasive angiography as a reference standard for diagnosis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Magnetocardiography (MCG) is a noninvasive imaging modality that has been extensively studied over the past several decades as a diagnostic imaging solution for various forms of cardiovascular disease. MCG measures the magnetic field that arises from the electrical activity of the heart's pacemaker activity, the very same activity which yields surface electric field potentials as measured by the electrocardiogram. Unlike electrocardiographic signals, however, MCG signals are undistorted by conductive tissue noise, and are highly sensitive to ischemic injury and vortex currents missed by the same electrocardiographic measurements. Accordingly, numerous clinical trials suggest the usefulness of MCG for the evaluation of ischemia in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome.

There is a growing body of evidence demonstrating the usefulness of MCG in the detection of myocardial ischemia, both in patients with symptoms of ACS, and in patients with stable angina. Since MCG is a functional assessor of depolarization and repolarization heterogeneity, it is hypothesized that MCG may be a useful frontline diagnostic modality to identify CMD in patients who would otherwise have normal coronary CT angiograms and/or stress tests. The proposed study intends to study the diagnostic accuracy of MCG in patients with suspected INOCA.

This demonstrates a significant unmet clinical need in the assessment of patients, and especially women, with INOCA. The current standard of care for these patients is resource/time intensive and associated with a significant rate of non-diagnostic clinical data requiring expensive and invasive evaluation for safe patient management. Magnetocardiography offers the potential for rapid, safe, noninvasive, non-radiologic assessment of the INOCA population, and may lead to earlier treatment strategies for CMD patients.

From the participating clinical sites, patients age ≥18 years who presented with chest pain or exertional dyspnea concerning for myocardial ischemia with no obstructive epicardial CAD on invasive or computed tomographic coronary angiography will be screened and subsequently enrolled when meeting criteria. This is a prospective observational study used for clinical data collection for the clinical validation testing of the CardioFlux MCG system. There will be no intervention introduced by the study device. The interpretation of the CardioFlux MCG data made by the study reader(s) will not be known to the patient's treating physician. Similarly, the patient's coronary physiology data, diagnosis, or interventions made by the patient's treating physician in following the standard of care will not be known to any of the scan readers. Except for the introduction of the MCG scan, there will be no other alteration to the patient standard of care.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

136

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32610
        • University of Florida, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine
    • Kentucky
      • Edgewood, Kentucky, United States, 41017
        • Saint Elizabeth Medical Center
    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48236
        • Ascension St. John Hospital
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic, Cardiovascular Research
    • Missouri
      • Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64111
        • St. Luke's Health System, Cardiovascular Research
    • New Jersey
      • Montclair, New Jersey, United States, 07042
        • Hackensack Meridian Mountainside Medical Center
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45219
        • The Christ Hospital
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic, Cardiovascular Medicine Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Men and women aged 18 years and older with chronic/stable angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease (suspected INOCA) with completed invasive CFR measurement within 180 days or are scheduled to undergo invasive angiography with CFR assessment by bolus thermodilution within 30 days of informed consent at an enrolling clinical trial center.

Description

INCLUSION CRITERIA

In order to be eligible to participate in this study, an individual must meet all the following criteria:

  1. ≥ 18 years of age at the time of enrollment.
  2. Willing to provide written informed consent.
  3. Signs and symptoms of chest pain prompted further evaluation by a coronary angiogram within the previous 5 years.
  4. Invasive CFR (via bolus thermodilution) completed within 180 days, or scheduled within 30 days, of informed consent.

    4.1. CFR must be performed in the mid Left Anterior Descending (LAD) vessel.

  5. Successfully passing CardioFlux MCG Quality Preview prior to MCG study scan. 5.1. Patients must be able to fit into the device. 5.2. Patients must be able to lie supine for 5 minutes. 5.3. Patients must not have any of the following: 5.3.1. Presence of ferromagnetic metal between the sternal notch and costal margin of the rib cage.

5.3.2. Implanted pacemakers or cardioverter/defibrillators. 5.3.3. Implanted infusion pumps and/or neuro stimulators. 5.3.4. Note: sternotomy wires and stents are acceptable. 5.3.5. Note: Failure to meet inclusion criteria 5.3 will render the MCG scan uninterpretable. However, any patient who may be scanned with the presence of any of the above objects is not at any risk of harm by the device. Prosthetic joints are allowed if the MCG Quality Preview is acceptable.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

An individual who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:

  1. Obstructive CAD (either anatomical or physiological) defined as:

    1.1. ≥ 70% lesion in any major epicardial or branch vessel by CT or invasive Angiography; 1.2. ≥ 50% lesion in the Left Main (LM) vessel by CT or invasive Angiography; 1.3. or either an FFR<0.80 or iFR or RFR <0.89 in the obstructed vessel,

  2. Any of the following cardiac pathologies:

    2.1. Epicardial spasm. 2.2. History of non-ischemic dilated or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. 2.3. Suspected myocarditis. 2.4. Documented acute coronary syndrome (ACS) within previous 30 days. 2.5. Known left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <45% on most recent assessment (can be via ECHO), or hospitalization for Reduced ejection fraction within 180 days. (HFpEF is allowed).

    2.6. Currently in atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter at the time of enrollment.

    2.7. Complete Bundle Branch Block. 2.8. Known moderate or severe valvular disease (anything besides mild). 2.9. Known severe Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) as determined by Echocardiography.

    2.10. Dextrocardia.

  3. Known estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 ml/min.
  4. Life expectancy <3-yrs. due to non-cardiovascular comorbidity.
  5. Concurrent enrollment in a clinical trial in which therapeutic intervention is administered within 30 days of enrollment.
  6. Prior enrollment in MICRO 1.0 and/or MICRO(T) data development study.
  7. Pregnancy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
CMD Positive
Patients who have confirmed presence of CMD via invasive angiography/CFR
The device is a magnetocardiography (MCG) scanner named CardioFlux, which is paired with a cloud processing software for the acquisition, display, and analysis of magnetic fields generated by cardiac electrical activity.
CMD Negative
Patients who have confirmed absence of CMD via invasive angiography/CFR
The device is a magnetocardiography (MCG) scanner named CardioFlux, which is paired with a cloud processing software for the acquisition, display, and analysis of magnetic fields generated by cardiac electrical activity.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic accuracy of CardioFlux MCG in determining the presence of CMD
Time Frame: 6 months

Diagnostic accuracy of CardioFlux MCG in determining the presence of coronary microvascular dysfunction, as measured by AUC with ground truth defined as an invasive CFR <2.5 for bolus thermodilution method.

H0: AUC<0.55 Ha: AUC≥0.55

6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient-Reported Experiences with CardioFlux
Time Frame: 6 months
Self-reported questionnaire (5 questions scored 1 (very dissatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied) with a minimum score of 5 and a maximum score of 25.
6 months
Participant Age
Time Frame: 6 months
Age (years)
6 months
Number of Adverse Events
Time Frame: 6 months
Safety will be monitored by the reporting of adverse events (related and non-related to the device) throughout the trial.
6 months
ROC/AUC, sensitivity and specificity at CFR cut-offs of <2.0 and 3.0.
Time Frame: 6 months
ROC/AUC, sensitivity and specificity for invasive CFR by thermodilution methods at CFR cut-offs of <2.0 and 3.0.
6 months
Participant Height
Time Frame: 6 months
in meters; if known
6 months
Participant Weight
Time Frame: 6 months
in kilograms; if known
6 months
Participant Gender at Birth
Time Frame: 6 months
Male/Female
6 months
Index of Microvascular Resistance (IMR)
Time Frame: 6 months
Sensitivity, Specificity, and ROC/AUC for CardioFlux will also be calculated against Index of Microvascular Resistance (IMR), defined as >25.
6 months
Comparison of bolus vs. continuous thermodilution
Time Frame: 6 months
Comparison of bolus thermodilution (CFR-bolus) and continuous thermodilution (CFR-cont) against MCG when CFR-cont is available.
6 months
Sensitivity and specificity in determining presence of CMD (Rule In)
Time Frame: 6 months

Patients who have confirmed presence of CMD via invasive CFR: Sensitivity and specificity of CardioFlux MCG in determining the presence of CMD with the gold standard defined as an invasive CFR <2.5 for thermodilution method as determined by a positive MCG scan output as defined by a Magnetic Dispersion Dynamics (MDD) score less than 41 fT/ms.

Sensitivity

  • H0<0.30
  • Ha≥0.30

Specificity

  • H0<0.70
  • Ha ≥0.70
6 months
Sensitivity and specificity in determining presence of CMD (Rule Out)
Time Frame: 6 months

Patients who have confirmed absence of CMD via invasive CFR:

Sensitivity

  • H0<0.70
  • Ha≥0.70

Specificity

  • H0<0.30
  • Ha ≥0.30
6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Seattle Angina Questionnaire - 7
Time Frame: 30 days
For patients whose CFR was completed within 30 days of MCG scan, SAQ-7 scores may be measured and analyzed.
30 days
Comparison of functional vs structural CMD
Time Frame: 6 months
Comparison of functional vs structural CMD will be analyzed (endothelial dependent vs independent).
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Zoe E Swann, PhD, Genetesis Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 3, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 15, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

April 15, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 29, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

January 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 7, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myocardial Ischemia

Clinical Trials on CardioFlux

Subscribe