Post-Operative Pain After Vital Pulpotomy in Molars With Symptomatic Pulpitis (POPAVPT)

August 26, 2024 updated by: Hasibe Elif Kuru, Uşak University

Evaluation of Post-operative Pain After Vital Pulpotomy in Molars With Symptomatic Pulpitis: A Prospective Clinical Study

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate post-operative pain (PEP) in teeth with symptomatic pulpitis following Vital Pulpotomy Treatments (VPT) with Calcium Silicate Cement (CSC). The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Is the post-operative pain one week after VPT significantly lower than pre-operative pain in permanent molars with symptomatic pulpitis?
  • How does post-operative pain in these teeth correlate with patient-related factors, such as age, gender, and painkiller intake?

Participants will:

  • Undergo Vital Pulpotomy Treatment with Calcium Silicate Cement (MTA)
  • Provide pain level assessments before VPT, immediately post-treatment, and at 24, 72 hours, and 1 week after treatment.

If there is a comparison group:

Researchers will compare the post-operative pain levels in teeth with symptomatic pulpitis undergoing VPT to assess its effectiveness in reducing pain compared to a control group not undergoing the treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Informed Consent:

Volunteers or parents will receive detailed information about protocols, risks, and benefits. Informed consent was obtained in writing after providing subject information, and participants could withdraw voluntarily at any time.

Sample Size Calculation:

Sample size calculation, utilizing G. Power-3.1.9.2, aimed at relationship analyses with a 95% confidence level, α=0.05, effect size of 0.30, and theoretical power of 0.80, resulting in a minimum sample size of 108.

Treatment Procedure:

Vital pulpotomy, administered by experienced professionals, involved local anesthesia, rubber dam isolation, caries removal, pulp amputation, hemostasis, application of ProRoot MTA and glass ionomer, and permanent restoration. Pain scores, assessed using the modified Wong-Baker scale, were recorded pre-treatment, at 24 and 72 hours post-procedure, along with inquiries about painkiller usage.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

114

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Usak, Turkey, 64200
        • Usak University School of Dentistry Department of Endodontics

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients aged between 7 and 70 with a noncontributory medical history presented for endodontic treatment at the Department of Endodontics and Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Usak University, Turkey

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged between 7 and 70 years
  • The teeth with diagnosis of irreversible symptomatic pulpitis
  • Permanent first and second molars with vital pulp
  • PAI ≤ 2 with vital pulp. (Ørstavik D, Kerekes K, & Eriksen HM (1986) The periapical index: A scoring system for radiographic assessment of apical periodontitis Dent Traumatol 2(1) 20-34, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1986.tb00119.x.)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical or radiographic signs of a necrotic pulp
  • The presence of a sinus, buccal tenderness, pathological mobility or evidence of pathology on a periapical radiograph
  • Teeth with horizontal or vertical root fractures
  • Swelling, acute endodontic, or periodontal abscess
  • Insufficient tooth tissue for a restoration, teeth requiring a post
  • Unable to give informed consent
  • Contraindicated systemic disease
  • Allergies the local anesthesia
  • Antibiotics, biphosphonates, and corticosteroid intake during the 7 days before treatment.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Patients who needed endodontic treatment on several teeth to avoid a potentially confused pain referral.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients with symptomatic pulpitis
vital permanent molars with symptomatic pulpitis in patients aged between 7-70
Vital pulpotomy involves the removal of the coronal pulp, while MTA is used to seal the root orifices. It is clear that vital pulp treatments for symptomatic pulpitis are a more reliable, cost-effective, and generally easier option than root canal treatment (RCT) once the mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) is introduced in dentistry. In vital pulpotomy, as opposed to RCT, tooth healing and symptoms are diminished while the vitality of the tooth is maintained. Furthermore, vital pulpotomy is a significantly more practical and economical treatment alternative than RCT.
Other Names:
  • vital pulp amputation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative Pain Assesment
Time Frame: 1) on treatment day, before starting the treatment; 2)24 hours later; 3)72 hours later and 4) 1 week later
Pain scores before and after treatment will be assessed using a modified Wong-Baker pain rating scale. The patients and parents will be given with comprehensive information and instructed to indicate their level of pain using a pain rating scale (0 = no pain, 1 = slight pain, 2 = moderate pain, 3 = severe pain) before treatment, at 24 hours, and 72 hours after the procedure. Additionally, they will be asked about the use of painkillers.
1) on treatment day, before starting the treatment; 2)24 hours later; 3)72 hours later and 4) 1 week later

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Berk Çelikkol, Dr, Usak University School of Dentistry

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 15, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

March 15, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 11, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 11, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 27, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

due to possible plagiarism issues, we are kindly requesting that the study descriptions be shared only after journal publication

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulpitis

Clinical Trials on Vital Pulpotomy

Subscribe