Expanding Clinical Trial Awareness Among Black Communities Through Digital Engagement

July 22, 2024 updated by: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
Under-representation of patients from racial/ethnic minority groups in cancer clinical trials is a major barrier to health equity. Black patients are significantly less likely to be enrolled in clinical trials compared with non-Hispanic White (White) patients although they carry a disproportionate burden of cancer mortality, the shortest survival rates, and are more likely to be diagnosed at later stages. Further, medical mistrust and lack of awareness and complexity of clinical trials are barriers that reduce the likelihood of clinical trial participation. The objective of this pilot study is to understand the effect of a culturally tailored decision aid (previously developed by our research team) on 1) medical mistrust, 2) patient knowledge about clinical trials, and 3) decision-making self-efficacy and determine the acceptability of the decision aid among Black patients currently or ever been diagnosed with cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study will be conducted online through Qualtrics.

Participants will answer pre-test survey questions, watch the culturally tailored decision aid video [Fostering Opportunities in Research Using Marketing Strategies (FOR US)] intervention, then answer post-intervention survey questions.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

109

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98109
        • Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Are 18 years of age or older
  • Identify as Black/African- American
  • Have Current or previous diagnosis of cancer
  • Speak and understand English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Are younger than 18 years of age
  • Do not identify as Black/African- American
  • Do not have a current or previous diagnosis of cancer
  • Are non - English-speaking

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Health Services Research
Participants watch a culturally tailored decision aid video. Surveys are completed before and after the video.
Watch video
Other Names:
  • Fostering Opportunities in Research Using Marketing Strategies (FOR US)
Answer survey questions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Medical Mistrust from Baseline to Post-Intervention: 12-item Group-Based Medical Mistrust Scale
Time Frame: Baseline and post-intervention (up to 15 minutes)
Will assess the effect of a culturally tailored decision aid video on medical mistrust. Participants will complete the 12-item Group-Based Medical Mistrust Scale at baseline and post-intervention. This is a 12-item validated survey focused on healthcare provided in the social context of racism and discrimination. Item responses use a Likert-type scale with higher scores indicating higher agreement.
Baseline and post-intervention (up to 15 minutes)
Change in Trust in Health Information from Baseline to Post-Intervention: Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS)
Time Frame: Baseline and post-intervention (up to 15 minutes)
Will assess the effect of a culturally tailored decision aid video on trust in information. Participants will complete 6 items from the National Cancer Institute - Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). HINTS collects nationally representative data routinely about the American public's use of cancer-related information. HINTS comprises multiple choice questions about medical research and medical records and patient-provider communications.
Baseline and post-intervention (up to 15 minutes)
Change in Patient Knowledge from Baseline to Post-Intervention: Five unique question items
Time Frame: Baseline and post-intervention (up to 15 minutes)
Will assess the effect of a culturally tailored decision aid video on patient knowledge about clinical trials via a five unique question items survey.
Baseline and post-intervention (up to 15 minutes)
Change in Clinical Trial Participation Decision-Making Self-Efficacy from Baseline to Post-Intervention: 11-item Decision Self-Efficacy Scale
Time Frame: Baseline and post-intervention (up to 15 minutes)
Will assess the effect of a culturally tailored decision aid video on clinical trial participation decision-making self-efficacy using the 11-item Decision Self-Efficacy Scale. The 11-item Decision Self-Efficacy Scale measures self-confidence or belief in one's abilities in decision making. Possible scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more decision self-efficacy and a better outcome.
Baseline and post-intervention (up to 15 minutes)
Acceptability of the intervention
Time Frame: At post-intervention (up to 15 minutes)
Participants will complete a post-intervention survey to assess acceptability of the video intervention. This survey is a 5-item measure; items responded to on a Likert-type scale with higher scores indicating higher acceptability.
At post-intervention (up to 15 minutes)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Vida Henderson, Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 6, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 12, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 23, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 22, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RG1124067
  • NCI-2024-00180 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))
  • FHIRB0020288 (Other Identifier: Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Clinical Trials on Educational Intervention (Video)

Subscribe