Arogya Sangama: 3 Way Partnership of People, Providers, and Panchayat for Health

This is a two-year pilot project in the Raichur and Chamarajanagar districts of Karnataka, India aiming to enhance the overall performance of primary health systems, including service utilization, quality, and responsive care, specifically within the recently developed facilities called the Health and Wellness Centres (HWCs). It will leverage rural local government structures known as Gram Panchayat Task Forces (GPTFs) created during the Covid-19 pandemic to strengthen the services delivered by HWCs. The aim is to build capacities and empower these GPTFs to function as a collaborative platform involving people, panchayats, and healthcare providers. This approach seeks to promote-community ownership, grassroots synergy, and social accountability to strengthen HWC service delivery in rural Karnataka (India).

Study Overview

• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Conditions: Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Health Care Utilization; Health Care Seeking Behavior
• Intervention / Treatment: Behavioral: Arogya Sangama

Detailed Description

Specific research questions:

1. What are attitudes, perceptions, and experiences of stakeholders about GPTFs involvement in the COVID 19 management and PHC service delivery?
2. What strategies and actions can GPTF undertake to improve community engagement, service provider support, and promote equitable access to essential PHC services?
3. What capacity building inputs, mechanisms, and resources will be required for GPTFs to strengthen community engagement and serve as collaborative platforms to increase social accountability for PHC services?
4. What has been the experience of GPTFs, community and program administrators about the Arogya Sangama model in terms of its applicability, adoption, and feasibility in the project settings?
5. How have GPTF interventions within Arogya Sangama project impacted community engagement, service provider support, and equitable access to essential PHC services.
6. What has been the effect of the GPTF intervention on utilization, and coverage of essential primary care services?

Empowered people and communities are a key pillar of primary health care (PHC). Within India, several policies, especially decentralization efforts under the National Health Mission had envisioned engagement of Panchayats or local self governments as a key mechanism to achieve large-scale community participation and ensure equitable access for vulnerable people, particularly women, children, and the poor. Empowering village panchayats to implement and provide oversight for National Health Ministry programs through village health committees and panchayat assemblies was expected to facilitate the process. The National Health Policy 2017 recommended an enhanced role of panchayats in health governance, including the social determinants of health and mandating community led accountability mechanisms for health to be driven by these local bodies.

States were expected to develop strategic plans and accountability mechanisms with active involvement of local self-governments for effective monitoring of quality of health care services. Despite several policies and promising vision, there is limited capacity and lack of a clear strategy for panchayat engagement and community ownership for HWCs at the state and district levels. Progress on implementing preventive and promotive services involving community and panchayats has been slow especially in aspirational districts and tribal settings. A recent evaluation of HWCs across 18 states in India including Karnataka further confirms lack of community participation as a key barrier in strengthening comprehensive primary health care (CPHC) delivery. These findings suggest a need to enable the state government to develop a clear community engagement strategy and build capacities of the panchayats in leading these efforts in the HWC service areas.

Building on the legacy of GPTF involvement in COVID 19 mitigation efforts so far, the Department of Rural Development and Panchayat Raj, (DoRDPR), within the Government of Karnataka, is proposing to strengthen and equip GPTFs with the necessary skills and tools to transform into effective forums for local health action and convergence to enhance PHC delivery. The DoRDPR has commissioned a two-year implementation research project in collaboration with the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and the Karnataka Health Promotion Trust (KHPT), a leading Non Governmental Organization for Public Health action in Karnataka. The pilot project aims to build capacities of GPTFs to function as a "3-way partnership platform" (comprising of people, panchayats, and service providers) to increase community ownership, grassroots convergence, and social accountability for rural HWCs in Karnataka in Devadurga and Kollegal Block of Raichur and Chamarajanagar district respectively.

The Johns Hopkins team will use its expertise in global health and design thinking to develop interventions for GPTF based on end users' perspectives. The team, with KHPT support, will gather insights on stakeholders' perspectives about GPTF, potential new ideas, and intervention strategies required to develop GPTF as an effective 3-way partnership platform. It will develop, implement, test a prototype model, and investigate its applicability, adoption, and feasibility. It will document changes in service provision and formulate an operational framework for GPTF-enabled responsive PHC.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Estimated): 4160
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• India
  • Devadurga, India
    • Devadurga Block PHC-HWC
  • Kollegāl, India
    • Kollegal PHC-HWC

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: Adult; Older Adult
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Description

Group 1 Inclusion criteria

• 18-49 years of age women who delivered in the last 12 months
• Residents of the districts and living within the service área covered by intervention and control PHC-HWCs
• Kannada speaking
• Able to provide consent

Group 2 inclusion criteria

• 30 or more years of age
• Not a known case of diabetes and hypertension
• Residents of the districts and living within the service area covered by intervention and control PHC-HWCs
• Kannada speaking
• Able to provide consent

Exclusion Criteria:

• Group 1: women not in the age group 18-49 years of age
• Group 2: participants younger than 30 years
• Not residing in the service area covered by intervention and control PHC-HWCs
• Unable to speak in Kannada
• Unable to provide consent

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Other
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arogya Sangama Intervention; The villages in the service area of both the intervention and control PHC-HWCs will be selected randomly, weighted by population size (PPS). There are two different population groups that are being examined to get a comprehensive picture of primary health services. Group 1: To assess the impact of the intervention in improving the coverage and utilisation of antenatal and post-natal services, a cross-sectional sample of 1680 women, 840 in each arm, in the age group of 18-49 years who delivered in the last 12 months will be interviewed in the baseline and similarly in the endline. Group 2: To estimate the effect of the intervention on improving the access to screening and management of NCDs among diabetic and hypertensives, a cross-sectional sample of 200 persons in the age group of 30 years and above from each arm will be interviewed in the baseline and similarly in the endline. Hence in each round the total sample will be 400.	Behavioral: Arogya Sangama; Using human-centered design, the investigators will work wit the community to develop a prototype Arogya Sangama model to identify methods to bring GPTF and HWC service providers to create ideas, systems, processes, services, and delivery strategies for the GPTFs. They will help identify and prioritize interventions and address barriers to usability. There will also be capacity building of GPTFs to implement the interventions identified.
No Intervention: Control; Same inclusion criteria as above, without Arogya Sangama intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Percent of antenatal care utilization rates	The study team will analyze whether there is a difference in antenatal care utilization rates. The percent of early antenatal care registration (within first trimester of pregnancy) will be assessed.	21 months
Percent of non-communicable disease screening rate	For Group 2, the percent of non-communicable disease screenings will be assessed.	21 months
Percent of coverage of essential primary health care (PHC) services	The study team will analyze whether there is a difference in coverage of essential PHC services.	21 months
Percent of patients satisfied with treatment	The study team will analyze percent of patients satisfied with the treatment at the Health and Wellness Centres	21 months

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
• Collaborators: Karnataka Health Promotion Trust
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Svea Closser, PhD, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): January 18, 2024
• Primary Completion (Actual): August 1, 2024
• Study Completion (Estimated): July 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: January 16, 2024
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: January 16, 2024
• First Posted (Actual): January 25, 2024

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): February 2, 2026
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: January 29, 2026
• Last Verified: January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Treatment Adherence and Compliance; Health Behavior; Behavior; Patient Acceptance of Health Care
• Other Study ID Numbers: IRB00023305

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No