Single-isocenter SBRT vs. Multiple-isocenter SBRT for Multiple Extracranial Metastases

March 11, 2024 updated by: Matthias Guckenberger

Single-isocenter SBRT vs. Multiple-isocenter SBRT for Multiple Extracranial Metastases: a Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Clinical Trial

The goal of this randomized non-inferiority clinical trial is to investigate whether single-isocenter SBRT using one treatment plan is similarly effective as multiple-isocenter SBRT using multiple treatment plans for multiple extracranial metastases. The main question it aims to answer is:

- whether 1-year freedom from local disease progression at the site of treated metastases after single-isocenter SBRT is non-inferior against multiple-isocenter SBRT at the same prescription doses.

Cancer patients with multiple extracranial distant metastases will be randomly assigned and treated either with single-isocenter SBRT or multiple-isocenter SBRT.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Treatment planning of SBRT for multiple metastases usually employs multiple isocenters, one for each target, resulting in multiple treatment plans. Execution of such treatments requires sequential multiple setups and treatment plan verifications. This practice complicates the workflow of SBRT planning and delivery and makes target-by-target treatment lengthy and patient compliance and comfort suboptimal. The investigators hypothesized that single-isocenter SBRT for extracranial multiple metastases is non-inferior in terms of local efficacy as compared to multiple-isocenter SBRT at the same radiation dose prescription.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

62

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Zurich, Switzerland, 8091
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Written informed consent according to Swiss law and ICH/GCP regulations signed and dated by the participant and the investigator before any trial specific procedures (Informed Consent Form);
  • Distant extracranial metastases (lung, mediastinal/cervical lymph node, liver, bone including spinal/paraspinal and abdominal/pelvic) from histologically confirmed cancer;
  • Distant metastases confirmed by imaging:

    • CT is required in all cases;
    • MRI is required for spinal and recommended for liver metastases;
    • PET/CT is recommended for tumors showing high uptake of 18F-FDG, 11Ccholine, 68Ga- or 18F-PSMA;
  • At least 2 distant metastases that are amendable to treat with a single isocenter approach according to the judgment of the treating clinician;
  • Patients who are willing and able to comply with scheduled visits, treatment, and other trial procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior radiotherapy for distant metastases if overlapping previous and current treatment plans leads to excessive dose to OARs;
  • Distant metastases with extension into the gastrointestinal tract, skin;
  • Large inter-lesion distance and location of distant metastases in different organs with different motion patterns;
  • Women who are pregnant or breast feeding;
  • Intention to become pregnant during the course of the trial;
  • Lack of safe contraception, defined as: Female participants of childbearing potential, not using and not willing to continue using a medically reliable method of contraception for the entire study duration, such as oral, injectable, or implantable contraceptives, or intrauterine contraceptive devices, or who are not using any other method considered sufficiently reliable by the investigator in individual cases;
  • Known or suspected non-compliance, drug or alcohol abuse;
  • Inability to follow the procedures of the trial, e.g. due to language problems of the participant;
  • Enrolment of the investigator, his/her family members, employees and other dependent persons.

Female participants who underwent hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy or postmenopausal for longer than 2 years are not considered as being of child bearing potential.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Single-isocenter SBRT
SBRT using a single-isocenter treatment plan
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
Active Comparator: Multiple-isocenter SBRT
SBRT using multiple treatment plans
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Freedom from local disease progression at the site of treated metastases
Time Frame: 1 year post-SBRT
Local control at the site of treated metastases
1 year post-SBRT

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acute adverse events (AEs)
Time Frame: 3 months post-SBRT
AEs occurring during SBRT and within 3 months post-SBRT
3 months post-SBRT
Late adverse events (AEs)
Time Frame: 12 months post-SBRT
AEs occurring 3 months post-SBRT and later
12 months post-SBRT
Overall survival
Time Frame: 1 year post-SBRT
The time from randomization to death from any cause
1 year post-SBRT
Progression-free survival
Time Frame: 1 year post-SBRT
The time from randomization to cancer progression at any site or death, whichever comes first
1 year post-SBRT
Overall treatment time
Time Frame: During the procedure
Time needed for setup, verification and beam-on
During the procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 19, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 5, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 19, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

January 30, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2023-01904

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Upon an individual request

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metastatic Cancer

Clinical Trials on SBRT

Subscribe