Study of Brain Activations and Physiological Responses Using NeuroBiofeedback in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis (NBF2023)

January 31, 2024 updated by: Giuseppa Maresca, IRCCS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino-Pulejo"

Study of Brain Activations and Physiological Responses Using NeuroBiofeedback in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis.Study of Brain Activations and Physiological Responses Using NeuroBiofeedback in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune disease of the central nervous system (CNS) characterized by inflammation, demyelination, gliosis, and neuronal loss. Neurological symptoms may include visual disturbances, numbness and tingling, focal weakness, bladder and bowel incontinence, and cognitive impairment. Some previous studies have indicated that the NeuroBiofeedback (NBF) technique could be a promising new treatment for the rehabilitation of many neurological disorders and neurodegenerative diseases, including MS. Several studies have investigated the beneficial effects of this technique on the motor and cognitive outcomes of MS, mainly aiming to evaluate motor performance, fatigue and chronic pain. Few studies have focused on the evaluation and treatment of cognitive processes with NBF, except for one study on information processing speed. Specifically, regarding the application of NBF techniques in MS, recent literature has demonstrated that modulation of the alpha-theta rhythm has led to an improvement in attentional processes with consequent reduction in anxiety. Therefore, the objective of this study is to verify the effectiveness of NBF training on the modulation of cortical activity and physiological responses through the exposure of subjects with MS to cognitive tasks and training for mood regulation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune disease of the central nervous system (CNS) characterized by inflammation, demyelination, gliosis, and neuronal loss. Neurological symptoms may include visual disturbances, numbness and tingling, focal weakness, bladder and bowel incontinence, and cognitive impairment. Some previous studies have indicated that the NeuroBiofeedback (NBF) technique could be a promising new treatment for the rehabilitation of many neurological disorders and neurodegenerative diseases, including MS. Several studies have investigated the beneficial effects of this technique on the motor and cognitive outcomes of MS, mainly aiming to evaluate motor performance, fatigue and chronic pain. Few studies have focused on the evaluation and treatment of cognitive processes with NBF, except for one study on information processing speed. Specifically, regarding the application of NBF techniques in MS, recent literature has demonstrated that modulation of the alpha-theta rhythm has led to an improvement in attentional processes with consequent reduction in anxiety. Therefore, the objective of this study is to verify the effectiveness of NBF training on the modulation of cortical activity and physiological responses through the exposure of subjects with MS to cognitive tasks and training for mood regulation.

Patients will not undergo an experimental procedure as foreseen by the study; the clinical and neuropsychological variables that will be collected for the study are those that are commonly collected by the neuropsychologist, in particular the main neuro-cognitive functions (memory, language, attention and executive functioning) and emotional abilities (meta cognition) will be considered. After enrollment, the clinical background and baseline characteristics of patients will be assessed. Enrolled patients will be randomly assigned to IG and SG. After randomization, patients will undergo instrumental examinations and neuropsychological evaluation, as required by the protocol. Patients in both groups will undergo 2 neurofeedback training sessions. All recruited subjects will be evaluated at two time-points: a first evaluation at baseline (T0) and at the end of the training (T1). Patients will undergo stimulation training via NBF 2 times a week for two months, for a total of 16 sessions. The procedure and execution of the training requires that the subjects are connected to a series of electrodes that will record the cortical electrical activity. During each session, IG patients will view their recorded brain waves and physiological responses in front of a computer screen, while a professional will explain to them what they need to do to intervene on what they see, in order to correctively modify their brain waves. While SG patients will be provided with irrelevant information (recorded data from other patients) and therefore will not be able to modulate their cortical activation

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

44

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Messina, Italy, 98124
        • Recruiting
        • IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 18-65 years ;
  • Confirmed clinical diagnosis;
  • Written informed consent obtained from the patient;
  • Moca score ≥ 20;
  • Patients with no contraindications to perform MRI and EEG.
  • Clinical stability
  • documented absence of relapse in the last month before treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ascertained diagnosis of multiple pathologies,
  • Patients with severe psychotic symptoms;
  • Epilepsy;
  • Drug use;
  • Endocrine-metabolic encephalopathies.
  • Presence of multiple therapies

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: intervention group (IG)
During each session IG patients will view their recorded brain waves and physiological responses in a computer screen, while a professional will explain to them what they need to do to intervene and make corrective changes to their brain waves.
During each session of bio/neurofeedback IG patients will view their recorded brain waves and physiological responses in a computer screen, while a professional will explain to them what they need to do to intervene and make corrective changes to their brain waves.
Sham Comparator: sham group (SG)
SG patients will be given irrelevant information (recorded data of other patients) and thus, they cannot modulate their cortical activation.
SG patients will be given irrelevant information (recorded data of other patients) and thus, they cannot modulate their cortical activation and see only the scenarios

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neuropsychological assessment
Time Frame: 30 minutes
For the neuropsychological evaluation, the Brief Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological Tests is used, which measures cognitive deterioration in patients with multiple sclerosis. The test evaluates memory, attention and learning speed. The higher the score, the better the performance. Administration of the total test battery takes approximately 30 minutes.
30 minutes
Mood assessment
Time Frame: 15 minutes
The Beck Depression Inventory is a self-report instrument, composed of 21 items that evaluate the cognitive symptoms, affective, motivational and somatic aspects of depression. Each item is rated on a Likert scale from 0 to 3 points. Scores between 0 and 13 indicate the absence of depressive symptoms; scores between 14 and 18 indicate mild-moderate depression; scores between 19 and 29 indicate moderate-severe depression.
15 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 9, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

February 2, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 2, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mood Disorders

Clinical Trials on Rehacor-T

Subscribe