Comparing Radiotherapy Immobilization Systems for Anxious HNC Patients (CRISP)

February 5, 2024 updated by: Marie-Eve Pelland, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

A Pilot Study to Assess the Use of Surface-guided Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Who Suffer From Anxiety

Background: Radiotherapy is a mainstay of treatment for ENT cancers, and its indication is frequent. Patients are positioned and immobilized using a thermoplastic mask, which is attached to the treatment table for the duration of each daily treatment. The mask's purpose is to prevent patient movement and ensure reproducible positioning. The advantages of using thermoplastic masks come at a cost for many patients. It is well established that mask fixation and mask anxiety are major concerns for patients, adversely affecting their quality of life and hindering treatment compliance. Surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) enables patients to be positioned and their movements monitored in real time during treatment. This technique has become more widely available in recent years, and is attractive because it does not involve ionizing radiation. However, although preliminary data have suggested a potential reduction in anxiety, this technique has not been evaluated for ENT RT in anxious/claustrophobic patients who cannot tolerate immobilization masks.

Objective: Investigators propose a pilot study to evaluate the feasibility and tolerability of using SGRT to manage position for patients with ENT cancer who report claustrophobia/anxiety.

Methodology: 15 participants will be recruited by the treating radiation oncologist from among patients scheduled to undergo radiation therapy at CHUM for their ENT cancer and identifying as claustrophobic/anxious. Participants who consent will be scheduled to undergo their radiotherapy using SGRT. Patients will be systematically treated with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) using SGRT on the linear accelerator with the Optical Surface Management System (OSMS) for the duration of the radiotherapy.

Measures: Patients' anxiety will be assessed using the GAD-7 and the CLQ throughout the treatment process. The feasibility and accuracy of radiotherapy treatment will be assessed using planning and daily pre-treatment examinations. In addition, skin toxicity will be assessed weekly.

Analyses: 1) Descriptive analyses, i.e. frequencies for categorical variables and means and standard deviations for continuous variables. 2) Estimation of confidence intervals.

Anticipated outcomes: Completion of this pilot project will enable investigators to plan and refine the methodological and organizational aspects for a large-scale study, i.e., a Phase III clinical trial comparing the use of SGRT with the use of a thermoplastic immobilization mask for anxious patients.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Eighteen years of age or older
  • Able to fluently speak, read and write French or English
  • Histologically confirmed head and neck cancer
  • Patients treated with radiotherapy as primary treatment
  • Identified as having moderate mask anxiety / claustrophobia (i.e. a score of 10 or more on the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 item (GAD-7) questionnaire and / or a score of 28 or more on the Claustrophobia questionnaire (CLQ) suffocation subscale and / a score of 24 or more on the CLQ restriction subscale
  • An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status grade of 0-2
  • Able to understand and sign consent form
  • Patients must be willing to comply with treatment plan and other study procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with significantly altered mental status or with psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study
  • Patients who cannot stay still during fraction because of a disorder (e.g., Parkinson's disease)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SGRT
Patient position will be managed by optical surface management system (OSMS). Equipment for this procedure includes an IMRT board, a long head cushion (with transparent Timo, moldcare, and shim), anatomical markers the cushion (shoulders, under the chin, etc.), a kneefix and arm plates. Every day, prior to treatment, there will be (1) A lateral kilo voltage (kV) image for jaw positioning and (2) a CBCT with standard match (3D column then 3D GTV/PTV). During treatment, patients will undergo real-time monitoring with the VisionRT system (SGRT). A second CBCT will de carried mid-treatment (after the 2nd of 3 arcs) and patient's position will be adjusted if deemed necessary.
Patient position management in real time during radiation using an optical Surface Management System (OSMS) (Vision RT)
Other Names:
  • VisionRT

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anxiety questionnaire
Time Frame: weekly from baseline to last week of treatment
Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7), GAD-7 total score for the seven items ranges from 0 to 21. Higher score indicates worse outcome.
weekly from baseline to last week of treatment
Anxiety behavior
Time Frame: weekly from baseline to end of radiation therapy, an average of 7 weeks
Behavioral assessments of anxiety: (a) use of psychoactive (anxiolytic) medication; (b) use of psychological interventions / strategies (exposure therapy, relaxation / meditation, etc.); (c) use of music in treatment room; (d) need for vocal reassurance by technologists during scan/MRI; (e) exam interruptions
weekly from baseline to end of radiation therapy, an average of 7 weeks
Claustrophobia
Time Frame: weekly from baseline to end of radiation therapy, an average of 7 weeks
Claustrophobia Questionnaire (CLQ), includes two subscales of 14 and 12 items, total scores range from 0 to 104. Higher score indicates worse outcome.
weekly from baseline to end of radiation therapy, an average of 7 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Well-being
Time Frame: weekly from baseline to end of radiation therapy, an average of 7 weeks
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale (FACT-G7). Total score for seven items ranges from 0 to 28. Higher score indicates better outcome.
weekly from baseline to end of radiation therapy, an average of 7 weeks
Setup consistency
Time Frame: Once - at treatment planning, on average 2 weeks after baseline
Setup consistency between consecutive treatment planning scans
Once - at treatment planning, on average 2 weeks after baseline
Intrafraction setup consistency
Time Frame: Daily from first to last radiotherapy treatment fraction, an average 7 weeks.
Intrafraction setup consistency as reported by the surface guidance system (total amplitude & max deviation over time)
Daily from first to last radiotherapy treatment fraction, an average 7 weeks.
Fraction time
Time Frame: Daily from first to last radiotherapy treatment fraction, an average 7 weeks.
Daily total fraction time as recorded
Daily from first to last radiotherapy treatment fraction, an average 7 weeks.
Skin toxicity
Time Frame: weekly from baseline to end of radiation therapy, an average of 7 weeks
Skin toxicity grade assessed by treating rdio-oncologist at weekly follow-up
weekly from baseline to end of radiation therapy, an average of 7 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marie-Eve Pelland, Ph.D., CHUM

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 19, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 13, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 13, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Head and Neck Cancer

Clinical Trials on OSMS position management

Subscribe