Direct Swallowing Training and Oral Sensorimotor Stimulation in Preterm Infants

December 4, 2023 updated by: Ee-Kyung Kim, Seoul National University Hospital

The Effects of Direct Swallowing Training and Oral Sensorimotor Stimulation in Preterm Infants

This is randomized controlled trial investigating the effects of direct swallowing training and oral sensorimotor stimulation in preterm infants on oral feeding performance.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

189

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

5 months to 7 months (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Preterm infants : before 32+0 weeks gestation
  • Infants who are receiving full tube feeding (more than 120 ml/kg/day)
  • Infants who discontinue of nasal continuous positive airway pressure before postmenstrual age 33+0 weeks
  • 'Feeders and growers'
  • The parents of the subject voluntarily sign the informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Major congenital anomalies : face, central nervous system, gastrointestine, heart, etc
  • Gastrointestinal complications
  • Chronic medical complications : Intraventricular hemorrhage ≥ Grade III, periventricular leukomalacia, surgical necrotizing enterocolitis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Control
Two 15-minute sessions of sham intervention/day, five days a week
The sham intervention consisted of the therapists placing his/her hands into the incubator or bassinet for 15 minutes without touching the infants. It is continued until infants are able to complete independent oral feeding, 2 days in a row with no adverse events that do not self-resolve.
Experimental: DST group
One session of DST and the other of sham intervention/day, five days a week
The sham intervention consisted of the therapists placing his/her hands into the incubator or bassinet for 15 minutes without touching the infants. It is continued until infants are able to complete independent oral feeding, 2 days in a row with no adverse events that do not self-resolve.
The DST consists of placing a bolus of 0.05-0.2 mL of formula milk (if the parents refuse, distilled water) via a 1-mL syringe directly on the medial-posterior part of the tongue approximately at the level of the hard and soft palate junction. The volume is started with 0.05 mL, and increased in increments of 0.05 mL to a maximum of 0.2 mL until the swallowing reflex is observed. Once the minimal volume necessary to initiate the swallow reflex is identified, it is used for the duration of the training. The bolus is provided every 30 sec over the 15-minute program or as tolerated. It is continued until infants are able to complete independent oral feeding, 2 days in a row with no adverse events that do not self-resolve.
Experimental: DST+OSMS group
One session of DST and the other of OSMS/day, five days a week
The DST consists of placing a bolus of 0.05-0.2 mL of formula milk (if the parents refuse, distilled water) via a 1-mL syringe directly on the medial-posterior part of the tongue approximately at the level of the hard and soft palate junction. The volume is started with 0.05 mL, and increased in increments of 0.05 mL to a maximum of 0.2 mL until the swallowing reflex is observed. Once the minimal volume necessary to initiate the swallow reflex is identified, it is used for the duration of the training. The bolus is provided every 30 sec over the 15-minute program or as tolerated. It is continued until infants are able to complete independent oral feeding, 2 days in a row with no adverse events that do not self-resolve.
The OSMS consists of a 15-minute stimulation program, whereby the first 12 minutes involve stroking the cheeks, lips, gums, and tongue, and the final 3 minutes consist of sucking on a pacifier. It is continued until infants are able to complete independent oral feeding, 2 days in a row with no adverse events that do not self-resolve.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Days from start to independent oral feeding
Time Frame: From date of starting oral feeding until the date of independent, full oral feeding, an expected average of 3 weeks
Days from start to independent oral feeding (independent oral feeding, 2 days in a row with no adverse events that do not self-resolve - The first successful day)
From date of starting oral feeding until the date of independent, full oral feeding, an expected average of 3 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Days from start to first full oral feeding
Time Frame: From date of starting oral feeding until the date of first full oral feeding, an expected average of 2 weeks
first full oral feeding : The first day that attain the full oral feeding regardless of feeding side effects
From date of starting oral feeding until the date of first full oral feeding, an expected average of 2 weeks
Days from start to complete full oral feeding
Time Frame: From date of starting oral feeding until the date of complete oral full feeding, an expected average of 3-4weeks
complete full oral feeding : 2 days in a row without any adverse events The first successful day)
From date of starting oral feeding until the date of complete oral full feeding, an expected average of 3-4weeks
Overall transfer
Time Frame: Total number of assessment : 3 times ( 1. starting oral feeding, 2. volume of oral feeding/total feeding volume x 100 = 50%, 3. volume of oral feeding/total feeding volume) x 100 = 100%
% volume taken/volume prescribed
Total number of assessment : 3 times ( 1. starting oral feeding, 2. volume of oral feeding/total feeding volume x 100 = 50%, 3. volume of oral feeding/total feeding volume) x 100 = 100%
Proficiency
Time Frame: Total number of assessment : 3 times ( 1. starting oral feeding, 2. volume of oral feeding/total feeding volume x 100 = 50%, 3. volume of oral feeding/total feeding volume) x 100 = 100%
% volume taken at 5 min/volume prescribed
Total number of assessment : 3 times ( 1. starting oral feeding, 2. volume of oral feeding/total feeding volume x 100 = 50%, 3. volume of oral feeding/total feeding volume) x 100 = 100%
Rate of transfer
Time Frame: Total number of assessment : 3 times ( 1. starting oral feeding, 2. volume of oral feeding/total feeding volume x 100 = 50%, 3. volume of oral feeding/total feeding volume) x 100 = 100%
mL/min volume of milk consumed relative to the duration of the oral Feeding session
Total number of assessment : 3 times ( 1. starting oral feeding, 2. volume of oral feeding/total feeding volume x 100 = 50%, 3. volume of oral feeding/total feeding volume) x 100 = 100%
Volume loss
Time Frame: Total number of assessment : 3 times ( 1. starting oral feeding, 2. volume of oral feeding/total feeding volume x 100 = 50%, 3. volume of oral feeding/total feeding volume) x 100 = 100%
% volume of milk spilled from the lips as a percentage of the total milk transferred
Total number of assessment : 3 times ( 1. starting oral feeding, 2. volume of oral feeding/total feeding volume x 100 = 50%, 3. volume of oral feeding/total feeding volume) x 100 = 100%
Neonatal Oral Motor Assessment Scale (NOMAS)
Time Frame: Total number of assessment : 2 times ( 1. 3-5 days after starting oral feeding, 2. within 3 days after stopping intervention)
  • comprehensive description of the infant's feeding patterns
  • identify normal oral-motor patterns and to differentiate disorganized from dysfunctional patterns
Total number of assessment : 2 times ( 1. 3-5 days after starting oral feeding, 2. within 3 days after stopping intervention)
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: From date of admission until the date of discharge, through study completion, expected average days of 3 month
Length of hospital stay
From date of admission until the date of discharge, through study completion, expected average days of 3 month
Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition
Time Frame: Corrected age 18-24 months
  • an individually administered instrument designed to assess the developmental functioning of infants, toddlers, and young children.
  • cognitive scale, motor scale (gross motor, fine motor), language scale (receptive communication, expressive communication)
  • subtest total raw scores & scaled scores / composite scores /percentile ranks/ confidence intervals
  • Total raw score range (min~max) : cognitive (0~91), receptive communication (0~49), expressive communication (0~48), fine motor (0~66), gross motor (0~72)
  • Higher scores mean better outcomes
Corrected age 18-24 months
Korean version of MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories (K M-B CDI)
Time Frame: postnatal age 36±2 months
-a simple screening test for language development
postnatal age 36±2 months
Korean-Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (K-WPPSI)-Fourth edition.
Time Frame: aged 4:00~4:11 years
  • An innovative measure of cognitive development and an intelligence test for preschoolers and young children
  • Primary index scales> verbal comprehension, visual spatial, fluid reasoning, working memory, processing speed ==> Full scale IQ
  • Ancillary index scales > vocabulary acquisition
  • scaled score, composite score, percentile rank, CI
  • Range of Full scale IQ : min (40) ~ max (160)
  • Higher scores mean better outcomes.
aged 4:00~4:11 years
Korean Developmental Screening Test
Time Frame: postnatal age 48±3 months
  • A fill-up questionnaire to be answered by parents so as to determine who experience developmental problems
  • Domains: gross motor, fine motor, language, cognition, sociality, self-care
  • Score range of each domain : min (0) ~ max (24)
  • Higher scores mean better outcomes.
postnatal age 48±3 months
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
Time Frame: postnatal age 48±3 months
  • a brief behavioural screening questionnaire
  • 5 subscales: Emotional problems scale, Conduct problems scale, Hyperactivity scale, Peer problems scale, Prosocial scale (score range of each scale : 0-10)
  • total difficulties score : summing scores from all the scales except the prosocial scale (score range : 0-40)
  • Lower scores mean better outcomes for the all scales except the prosocial scale
postnatal age 48±3 months
Behavioral Pediatrics Feeding Assessment Scale (BPFAS)
Time Frame: postnatal age 48±3 months
  • A comprehensive and widely used measure of behavioral and skill-based feeding problems
  • It consists of 35 questions: 25 related to child eating, and 10 related to parent feeding behaviors.
  • Parents answer each question on a five-point Likert scale, then indicate whether they perceive that behavior to be problematic or not.
  • Child an parent frequency scores : from the Likert scales (score range : min 35 ~ max 175)
  • Child and parent problem scores : from the yes/no questions
postnatal age 48±3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ee-kyung Kim, Seoun National University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2020

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 23, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2015

First Posted (Estimated)

July 27, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 5, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Premature Birth of Newborn

Clinical Trials on Sham intervention

3
Subscribe