- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06274307
Efficacy of Transversus Abdominis Plane Block
Efficacy of Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in an Insufflated Abdomen
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Background
Every year 15 million laparoscopic procedures are performed globally, with 4,800,000 or 32% of procedures performed in the U.S. alone. This minimally invasive procedure is one of the most common surgical procedures in the United States. Approximately 350,000 or half of all bilateral tubal sterilizations are performed laparoscopically; almost two-thirds of the 600,000 hysterectomies are performed via laparoscopy. Laparoscopy is also commonly used for diagnostic purposes, and to perform other common procedures such as treatment for endometriosis and lysis of adhesions. During laparoscopic gynecologic surgeries, the surgical team will have the abdomen inflated with pressurized carbon dioxide for surgical visualization purposes which is then released at the end of the surgical procedure. For many laparoscopic procedures, a transversus abdominis plane block (TAP) block using a long-acting local anesthetic is used to manage pain performed outside the OR, more for logistical ease, traditionally this block is performed outside the operating room setting, in the post-operative period on a non- insufflated abdomen under ultrasound guidance.
Rationale for conducting the research. This study has two major aims; 1) to determine whether post-operative TAP blocks performed in an insufflated abdomen will result in more optimal postoperative pain control compared to TAP blocks performed in the traditional method in a non-insufflated abdomen and 2) to observe if performing the TAP block in a insufflated abdomen will be more clinically efficient to perform than the traditional method performed in a non-insufflated abdomen. The study hypothesis is that the study group receiving the TAP block the insufflated abdomen will have more optimal postoperative pain control, requiring less adjuvant pain medication as compared to the participants receiving the control intervention. Additionally, we hypothesize that the proceduralist will be able to perform a TAP block in less time with and with few attempts in the insufflated compared to the non- insufflated abdomen group due to better visualization of the anatomical planes from insufflation of the abdominal area. The results of this study may add additional clinically effective practice guidelines for both regional anesthesia and acute pain management relating to laparoscopic gynecological procedures. Furthermore, TAP blocks performed under insufflation may provide a viable method for decreasing opioid use and reducing potential opioid dependence in patients following surgical intervention.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Michigan
-
Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48201
- Detroit Medical Center Detroit Receiving Hospital
-
Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48201
- Detroit Medical Center, Harper University Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Female gynecological patients between 18 years and 85 years consented and scheduled for an obstetrics/gynecology laparoscopic procedure.
- Consent received to receive a TAP block.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who are not proficient in the English language or cannot consent
- Patients who have an allergy to local anesthetics (amides)
- Patients with subcutaneous emphysema
- Patients whose surgical procedures require incisions above the umbilicus
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Active Comparator: Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block performed in operating room
The treatment group will have a transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block performed prior to closing surgical port sites post-operatively in an insufflated abdomen in the operating room (OR).
The local anesthetic used for the TAP block will be 30 to 40ml of Ropivacaine 0.375%, not to exceed a max dose of 3mg/kg of 0.375% divided equally bilaterally.
Each study participant will receive standard post-operative pain medication orders of morphine 2mg q5mins times 4 doses followed by hydromorphone.
0.5mg q10mins times 4 doses.
|
A transversus abdominis plane block (TAP) block using a long-acting local anesthetic is used to manage pain during the intermediate (12-24hr) post-operative period following laparoscopic abdominal surgeries.
Drug: The local anesthetic to be used in this specific intervention will be 30 to 40ml of Ropivacaine 0.375%, not to exceed a max dose of 3mg/kg of 0.375% and divided equally bilaterally.
|
|
Active Comparator: Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block performed in PACU
The treatment group will have a transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block performed post-operatively after the patient has been transferred from the Operating Room to the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU).
The local anesthetic used for the TAP block will be 30 to 40ml of Ropivacaine 0.375%, not to exceed a max dose of 3mg/kg of 0.375% divided equally bilaterally.
Each study participant will receive standard post-operative pain medication orders of morphine 2mg q5mins times 4 doses followed by hydromorphone.
0.5mg q10mins times 4 doses
|
A transversus abdominis plane block (TAP) block using a long-acting local anesthetic is used to manage pain during the intermediate (12-24hr) post-operative period following laparoscopic abdominal surgeries.
Drug: The local anesthetic to be used in this specific intervention will be 30 to 40ml of Ropivacaine 0.375%, not to exceed a max dose of 3mg/kg of 0.375% and divided equally bilaterally.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Time to perform TAP Block
Time Frame: Within 10 minutes of starting procedure.
|
Time taken to successfully perform the TAP block.
Defined as the time from initial placement of ultrasound probe on the skin to the completion of the block on the contralateral side.
|
Within 10 minutes of starting procedure.
|
|
TAP block attempts
Time Frame: Within 10 minutes of starting procedure.
|
The number of attempts taken to sucessfully perform the TAP block.
|
Within 10 minutes of starting procedure.
|
|
Pain Score Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 0 Hours Post Surgery
Time Frame: 0 hours following TAP block]
|
Pain score on an 11-point (0 - no pain to 10 - worst imaginable pain) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at rest
|
0 hours following TAP block]
|
|
Pain Score Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 1 Hours Post Surgery
Time Frame: 1 hour following TAP block]
|
Pain score on an 11-point (0 - no pain to 10 - worst imaginable pain) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at rest
|
1 hour following TAP block]
|
|
Pain Score Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 2 Hours Post Surgery
Time Frame: 2 hours following TAP block]
|
Pain score on an 11-point (0 - no pain to 10 - worst imaginable pain) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at rest
|
2 hours following TAP block]
|
|
Pain Score Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 4 Hours Post Surgery
Time Frame: 4 hours following TAP block]
|
Pain score on an 11-point (0 - no pain to 10 - worst imaginable pain) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at rest
|
4 hours following TAP block]
|
|
Pain Score Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 24 Hours Post Surgery
Time Frame: 24 hours following TAP block]
|
Pain score on an 11-point (0 - no pain to 10 - worst imaginable pain) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at rest
|
24 hours following TAP block]
|
|
Postoperative Opioid Consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours post operative period
|
Patient opioid consumption in the 24 hours post TAP block
|
24 hours post operative period
|
|
Ease of performing TAP Block-anatomical plane visualization
Time Frame: Within 10 minutes of starting procedure
|
The anatomical planes were clearly visualized and identified.
Survey of operator - Likert Score
|
Within 10 minutes of starting procedure
|
|
Ease of performing TAP Block-performance efficacy
Time Frame: Within 10 minutes of starting procedure
|
The approach optimized the efficacy of the block.
Survey of operator- Likert score
|
Within 10 minutes of starting procedure
|
|
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 24-hours post operative period
|
Patient satisfaction with analgesia score (0 to 100%)
|
24-hours post operative period
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Justin Hruska, MD, Wayne State University/Detroit Medical Center
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB-21-10-4045
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Anesthesia, Local
-
University Health Network, TorontoActive, not recruiting
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisINSERM UMR-942, Paris, France; M3DISIMRecruitingPrediction Models for Cardiovascular and Neurocognitive Disease Risk in the General Population (CME)Anesthesia, Local | AnesthesiaFrance
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyCompletedAnesthesia, Local | AnesthesiaGermany
-
Grünenthal GmbHTerminatedAnalgesia | Anesthesia, Local | AnesthesiaNetherlands
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyCompletedAnesthesia, Local | Anesthesia | Anesthesia; Adverse EffectGermany
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisINSERM UMR-942, Paris, France; M3DISIMRecruiting
-
Novocol Pharmaceutical of Canada, Inc.CompletedAnesthesia, Local | Dental Anesthesia | Anesthesia, ReversalUnited States
-
Kfir SiagNot yet recruiting
-
University Health Network, TorontoCompleted
-
Hams Hamed AbdelrahmanCompleted
Clinical Trials on Transversus abdominis plane block
-
Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training HospitalCompletedPostoperative Complications | Postoperative Pain | Analgesia | Regional Anesthesia MorbidityTurkey
-
Istanbul Medeniyet UniversityNot yet recruitingExternal Oblique Intercostal Plane Block | Subcostal Transverse Abdominis Plane Block
-
Mackay Memorial HospitalRecruitingLaparoscopy | Anesthesia and Analgesia | Autonomic Nervous System | Nerve Block | EEGTaiwan
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompletedMobility | Transversus Abdominis Plane Block | Wearable Device | Anterior Iliac Grafting | Regional Block TechniqueEgypt
-
Seoul National University HospitalCompletedPostoperative Pain, AcuteSouth Korea
-
Ain Shams UniversityRecruiting
-
Benaroya Research InstituteCompletedPost-Operative PainUnited States
-
Kocaeli UniversityNot yet recruitingBlood Bupivacaine ConcentrationTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Tanta UniversityCompletedPediatrics | Transversus Abdominis Plane Block | Postoperative Analgesia | External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block | Open NephrectomyEgypt
-
Tanta UniversityCompletedNephrectomy | Transversus Abdominis Plane Block | Postoperative Analgesia | External Oblique Intercostal Plane BlockEgypt