Cognitive Training for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Developmental Delays

February 17, 2024 updated by: Taipei Medical University

Cognitive Training Effects for Preschool Children With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Developmental Delays

To explore whether children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and developmental delays who receive cognitive training and conventional rehabilitation can improve executive function more than traditional rehabilitation alone. A magnetoencephalographic examination will be arranged to explore how brain network activation works.

Research method: 20 preschool children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and developmental delays under rehabilitation therapy will be collected. They will be randomly assigned to the experimental group (receiving rehabilitation therapy and three times per week for 15 minutes, a total of 12 weeks of interactive cognitive training) and the control group (receiving rehabilitation therapy only). Therapeutic effects will be evaluated.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Research method: 20 preschool children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and developmental delays under rehabilitation therapy will be collected. They will be randomly assigned to the experimental group (receiving rehabilitation therapy and three times per week for 15 minutes, a total of 12 weeks of interactive cognitive training) and the control group (receiving rehabilitation therapy only). Therapeutic effects will be evaluated, including Sensory Profile, Swanson, Nolan and Pelham version IV, Conners Kiddie Continuous Performance test, Chinese Childhood Executive Functioning Inventory, and Chinese version of Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-IV; and physical health conditions, including Pediatric Daily Occupation Scale, Pediatric Outcome Data Collection Instrument (PODCI), Child Health Questionnaire- Parent Form, Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL)will be evaluated by an investigator who is blinded to the group's allocation at before treatment and after 12 weeks of treatment. All participants will be investigated by magnetoencephalography (MEG) to identify the brain network connectivity while performing different tasks before and after 12 weeks of treatment. Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging will be performed for brain mapping.

Possible results: The study will shed light on therapeutic effects and brain network connectivity by cognitive training for preschool children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and developmental delays.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan, 111-01
        • Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ru-Lan Hsieh, MD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • preschool children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and developmental delays under regular rehabilitation programs intelligence quotient 70 or greater

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age less than 4 or greater than 6 metal in teeth intelligence quotient less than 70

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention group
Traditional rehabilitation program with additional cognitive training
cognitive training, 15 min, three times per week, for 12 weeks
Other Names:
  • traditional rehabilitation programs
Other: Active Control
Traditional rehabilitation programs without additional cognitive training
Traditional rehabilitation programs
Other Names:
  • traditional rehabilitation programs

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes of executive function
Time Frame: score change from baseline to 12 weeks of treatment, higher score, the better outcome
Changes in scores assessed by the Taiwanese Traditional Chinese Childhood Executive Functioning Inventory range from 1 to 5, higher scores indicate a worse outcome
score change from baseline to 12 weeks of treatment, higher score, the better outcome

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
changes of symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
Time Frame: score change from baseline to 12 weeks of treatment, higher score, the better outcome
Changes in scores assessed by Swanson, Nolan and Pelham questionnaire, range from 0 to 54, higher scores indicate a worse outcome
score change from baseline to 12 weeks of treatment, higher score, the better outcome
changes of attention
Time Frame: score change from baseline to 12 weeks of treatment, higher score, the better outcome
Changes in scores assessed by Conners Kiddie Continous Performance Test, range from 0-100, higher scores indicate a worse outcome
score change from baseline to 12 weeks of treatment, higher score, the better outcome
Changes of sensory integration
Time Frame: score change from baseline to 12 weeks of treatment, higher score, the better outcome
Changes in scores assessed by Sensory Profile, range from 0-100, higher scores indicate a better outcome
score change from baseline to 12 weeks of treatment, higher score, the better outcome
changes of intelligence
Time Frame: score change from baseline to 12 weeks of treatment, higher score, the better outcome
Changes in scores assessed by the Wechsler Intelligence Scale of children, the average score is 100, with a higher score indicating higher intelligence and a lower score indicating a lower level of intelligence.
score change from baseline to 12 weeks of treatment, higher score, the better outcome
changes of functional performance
Time Frame: score change from baseline to 12 weeks of treatment, higher score, the better outcome
Changes in scores assessed by Pediatric Outcome Data Collection Instrument, range from 0-100, higher scores indicate a better outcome
score change from baseline to 12 weeks of treatment, higher score, the better outcome
Changes of family impact
Time Frame: score change from baseline to 12 weeks of treatment, higher score, the better outcome
Changes in scores assessed by Child Health Questionaire, parent form 28, range from 0-100, higher scores indicate a better outcome
score change from baseline to 12 weeks of treatment, higher score, the better outcome
Changes of quality of life
Time Frame: score change from baseline to 12 weeks of treatment, higher score, the better outcome
Changes in scores assessed by Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory, range from 0-100, higher scores indicate a better outcome
score change from baseline to 12 weeks of treatment, higher score, the better outcome
Changes in performance activity in kindergarten
Time Frame: score change from baseline to 12 weeks of treatment, higher score, the better outcome
Changes in scores assessed by Kindergarten Performance Activity, range from 0-100, higher scores indicate a worse outcome
score change from baseline to 12 weeks of treatment, higher score, the better outcome

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
changes of brain network connectivity
Time Frame: connectivity change from baseline to 12 weeks of treatment, higher score, the better outcome
Changes of brain network connectivity assessed by magnetoencephalography, range from 0-1, higher scores indicate a better outcome
connectivity change from baseline to 12 weeks of treatment, higher score, the better outcome

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ru-Lan Hsieh, MD, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 5, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

February 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Developmental Delays

Clinical Trials on cognitive training

Subscribe