- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06283498
Transvaginal Detrusor Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Overactive Bladder
The goal of this Safety and efficacy of transvaginal Detrusor Nerve Ablation for treatment of overactive bladder symptoms, including refractory overactive bladder
The main questions it aims to answer are:
•Change from baseline to the end of treatment in a 3-day diary analysis to assess the reduction of urgency incontinence episodes. [Time Frame: 3 months]
Subjects will undergo one treatment session and be reassessed at 4 weeks post-treatment. If less than a 50% improvement is noted, a second and third treatment session will be performed at 4-week intervals. If more than a 50% improvement is noted, patients will be followed longitudinally to assess the durability of the treatment. Investigators will have the ability to initiate a second and or third treatment on an individual basis.
Follow-up will occur at 3- months, 6-months and 12 months after the subject's last treatment.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bogota,, Colombia
- The Hospital Infantil Universitario de San José (University Children's Hospital of San José)
-
-
-
-
California
-
Corona Del Mar, California, United States, 92625
- Mickey Karram MD
-
-
Tennessee
-
Knoxville, Tennessee, United States, 37932
- Institute for Female Pelvic Medicine
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 21-80 years old, inclusive
- Subject is willing to provide Informed Consent, is geographically stable, understands the requirements for completing the bladder diary and is willing to comply with the required diary, follow-up visits, and testing schedules.
- Urinary incontinence, predominant urgency incontinence for at least one episode on a 3-days diary.
- Reporting at least "moderate bother" on Item 2 on the UDI, "Do you experience a strong feeling of urgency to empty your bladder" (on new patient paperwork)
- >8 micturitions and >3 urgency episodes per 24 hours on a 3-day bladder diary (see Appendix 2)
- 1 UUI episode on a 3-day bladder diary (see Appendix 2)
- Not currently taking anti-muscarinic or beta3 agonist therapy (after at least a 2-week wash-out period)
- Post-void residual (PVR) ≤ 100 ml NOTE: it may include Subjects with a single PVR of >100 ml followed by two consecutive PVR measurements of ≤100 ml in the study. We will record the final acceptable PVR measurement in the data.
- Ability and willingness to self-catheterize in case this is necessary.
- With respect to their reproductive capacity must be post-menopausal or surgically sterile or willing to use a contraceptive method with a failure rate of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly from screening until the last follow up
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pacemaker or internal defibrillator, or any other metallic or electronic implant anywhere in the body.
- Any permanent implant or an injected chemical substance in the treatment area.
- Superficial areas that have been injected with HA/collagen/fat injections or other augmentation methods with bio-material during last 6 months.
- Current or history of cancer, or current condition of any other type of cancer, or premalignant moles.
- Severe concurrent conditions, such as cardiac disorders, sensory disturbances, epilepsy, uncontrolled hypertension, and liver or kidney diseases.
- Pregnancy, the intention of pregnancy and nursing.
- Impaired immune system due to immunosuppressive diseases such as AIDS and HIV, autoimmune disorders, or use of immunosuppressive medications.
- Patients with a history of diseases stimulated by heat, such as recurrent Herpes Simplex in the treatment area, may be treated only following a prophylactic regimen.
- Poorly controlled endocrine disorders, such as diabetes or thyroid dysfunction and hormonal virilization.
- Any active condition in the treatment area, such as sores, eczema, and rash.
- History of vaginal disorders, keloids, abnormal wound healing.
- History of bleeding coagulopathies or use of anticoagulants in the last 10 days, as per the practitioner's discretion.
- Non-English speakers
- Severely impaired mobility or cognition
- Spinal cord injury or advanced/severe neurologic condition including Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson's Disease
- Repair of pelvic organ prolapse or incontinence procedure in the previous 6 months
- Ongoing complications of prior anti-incontinence surgery
- Received intravesical botulinum injection within the previous 12 months
- History of an implanted nerve stimulator for incontinence
- History of prior sling or vaginal mesh placement,
- Previous diagnosis of interstitial cystitis, bladder cancer, or chronic pelvic pain
- Current participation in any other conflicting interventional or OAB treatment study
- Planning to become pregnant during the study period.
- Pelvic radiation, history of pelvic radiation
- Subject with 24-hour total urine volume voided greater than 3,000 ml as measured at screening period.
- Active urinary tract or vaginal infection
- Anatomical conditions that would prevent the introduction and use of the device, in such as significant pelvic organ prolapse,
- Current hydronephrosis or hydroureter
- Bladder outflow obstruction
- Active pelvic organ malignancy
- Urethral obstruction
- Urinary retention or prolonged catheter use
- Less than 12 months post-partum or currently pregnant or plan to become pregnant in the following 12 months.
- Untreated symptomatic urinary tract infection
- Unevaluated hematuria
- Medical instability
- Allergy to anesthetics as Benzocaine/Lidocaine/Tetracaine Cream (BLT Cream) used in the study
- Not available for follow-up in 6 months
- Participation in other research trials that could influence results of this study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Device Treatment
20 female patients with overactive bladder symptoms, aged 21 to 80 years old, inclusive from two sites.
|
Assigned to be treated using the modified Morpheus8V
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in urgency incontinence episodes after 3 month
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Change from baseline to the end of treatment in a 3-day diary analysis to assess the reduction of urgency incontinence episodes.
|
3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Analysis to assess the urinary frequency
Time Frame: 1 month
|
Change from baseline to the end of treatment in a 3-day diary analysis to assess the urinary frequency.
|
1 month
|
|
Analysis to assess urinary frequency
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Change from baseline to the end of treatment in a 3-day diary analysis to assess urinary frequency.
|
3 months
|
|
Analysis to assess the urinary frequency.
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Change from baseline to the end of treatment in a 3-day diary analysis to assess the urinary frequency.
[Time Frame: 6 months]
|
6 months
|
|
Patient-reported Pain assessment
Time Frame: treatment procedure
|
The subject will be asked to rate the severity from 0 to 10, with 0 equaling no symptoms and 10 equaling the worst possible symptoms.
A number is obtained by measuring up to the point the subject has indicated.
|
treatment procedure
|
|
Change in urgency incontinence episodes after 1 month
Time Frame: 1 month
|
Change from baseline to the end of treatment in a 3-day diary analysis to assess the reduction of urgency incontinence episodes
|
1 month
|
|
Change in urgency incontinence episodes
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Change from baseline to the end of treatment in a 3-day diary analysis to assess the reduction of urgency incontinence episodes.
|
6 months
|
|
Change in urgency incontinence episodes
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Change from baseline to the end of treatment in a 3-day diary analysis to assess the reduction of urgency incontinence episodes.
|
12 months
|
|
Analysis to assess the urinary frequency.
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Change from baseline to the end of treatment in a 3-day diary analysis to assess the urinary frequency.
|
12 months
|
|
Assessment of the impact of the treatment on Overactive Bladder symptoms
Time Frame: 1 month
|
Measured by the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire Total Score. Normative values for a general population, 10% of whom scored above 4.8 on IIQ-7. Values obtained from patients with severe incontinence indicate that a score > 70 on the IIQ signifies a poor QOL. Lower scores on IIQ-7 may identify more females who are bothered by urinary incontinence. 7 items are divided into four domains (physical activity, travel, social relationships, emotional health). Item-level scores are rated on a four-point Likert scale (where 0=not at all and 3=greatly), determined by the self-reported impact of symptoms related to urinary incontinence. The average score of items responded to is calculated. The average, which ranges from 0 to 3, is multiplied by 33 1/3 to put scores on a scale of 0 to 100. |
1 month
|
|
Assessment of the impact of the treatment on Overactive Bladder symptoms
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Measured by the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire Total Score. Normative values for a general population, 10% of whom scored above 4.8 on IIQ-7. Values obtained from patients with severe incontinence indicate that a score > 70 on the IIQ signifies a poor QOL. Lower scores on IIQ-7 may identify more females who are bothered by urinary incontinence. 7 items are divided into four domains (physical activity, travel, social relationships, emotional health). Item-level scores are rated on a four-point Likert scale (where 0=not at all and 3=greatly), determined by the self-reported impact of symptoms related to urinary incontinence. The average score of items responded to is calculated. The average, which ranges from 0 to 3, is multiplied by 33 1/3 to put scores on a scale of 0 to 100. |
3 months
|
|
Assessment of the impact of the treatment on Overactive Bladder symptoms
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Measured by the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire Total Score. Normative values for a general population, 10% of whom scored above 4.8 on IIQ-7. Values obtained from patients with severe incontinence indicate that a score > 70 on the IIQ signifies a poor QOL. Lower scores on IIQ-7 may identify more females who are bothered by urinary incontinence. 7 items are divided into four domains (physical activity, travel, social relationships, emotional health). Item-level scores are rated on a four-point Likert scale (where 0=not at all and 3=greatly), determined by the self-reported impact of symptoms related to urinary incontinence. The average score of items responded to is calculated. The average, which ranges from 0 to 3, is multiplied by 33 1/3 to put scores on a scale of 0 to 100. |
6 months
|
|
Assessment of the impact of the treatment on Overactive Bladder symptoms
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Measured by the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire Total Score. Normative values for a general population, 10% of whom scored above 4.8 on IIQ-7. Values obtained from patients with severe incontinence indicate that a score > 70 on the IIQ signifies a poor QOL. Lower scores on IIQ-7 may identify more females who are bothered by urinary incontinence. 7 items are divided into four domains (physical activity, travel, social relationships, emotional health). Item-level scores are rated on a four-point Likert scale (where 0=not at all and 3=greatly), determined by the self-reported impact of symptoms related to urinary incontinence. The average score of items responded to is calculated. The average, which ranges from 0 to 3, is multiplied by 33 1/3 to put scores on a scale of 0 to 100. |
12 months
|
|
Patient-reported outcome measure
Time Frame: 1 month
|
Patient perception of bladder condition and device acceptance measured by Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire.
6 points Likert scale, grading from 0 to 5. A lower score indicates a better outcome.
|
1 month
|
|
Patient-reported outcome measure
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Patient perception of bladder condition and device acceptance measured by Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire.
6 points Likert scale, grading from 0 to 5. A lower score indicates a better outcome.
|
3 months
|
|
Patient-reported outcome measure
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Patient perception of bladder condition and device acceptance measured by Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire.
6 points Likert scale, grading from 0 to 5. A lower score indicates a better outcome.
|
6 months
|
|
Patient-reported outcome measure
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Patient perception of bladder condition and device acceptance measured by Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire.
6 points Likert scale, grading from 0 to 5. A lower score indicates a better outcome.
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Mickey Karram, MD, not affiliated
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- DO612574A
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Overactive Bladder Syndrome
-
Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt UniversityCompletedOveractive Bladder | Overactive Detrusor | Overactive Bladder SyndromeTurkey
-
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, TaiwanRecruitingOveractive Bladder SyndromeTaiwan
-
Buddhist Tzu Chi General HospitalUnknownOveractive Bladder SyndromeTaiwan
-
Radboud University Medical CenterWithdrawn
-
PfizerCompleted
-
PfizerCompletedOveractive Bladder SyndromeGermany
-
Hospital Italiano de Buenos AiresRecruitingOveractive Bladder SyndromeArgentina
-
Far Eastern Memorial HospitalRecruitingOveractive Bladder SyndromeTaiwan
-
Far Eastern Memorial HospitalRecruitingOveractive Bladder SyndromeTaiwan
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterUniversity Hospital, Antwerp; Zuyderland HospitalUnknownOveractive Bladder | Overactive Bladder SyndromeNetherlands
Clinical Trials on Device Morpheus8V
-
ResMedKlinEra Global ServicesNot yet recruitingObstructive Sleep ApneaAustralia
-
Facet TechnologiesLifeScanCompletedDiabetesUnited States
-
Karolinska InstitutetUnknownDegenerative Disc Disease | Discogenic Low Back PainSweden
-
Cala Health, Inc.Not yet recruiting
-
AOTI Ltd.CompletedDiabetic Foot UlcerUnited Kingdom, United States, Germany, France, Luxembourg
-
Universitair Ziekenhuis BrusselTerminated
-
International Agency for Research on CancerUniversity of North Carolina Global Project Zambia; Liger Medical LlcCompleted
-
University of BernDCB Research AG; Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernCompletedGlucose Metabolism Disorders | Diabetes Mellitus | Endocrine System Diseases | Metabolic DiseaseSwitzerland
-
Neurive Co.,Ltd.CompletedTinnitus | Subjective TinnitusSouth Korea
-
Kasey PhiferThe National Centre for ElectroMagnetic Therapies CICCompletedUnspecified Trauma- and Stressor-Related DisorderUnited Kingdom