The Effect of an Individually Adapted Lumbosacral Orthosis on Plantar Pressure and Balance (lumbosacral)

March 18, 2024 updated by: merve yilmaz menek, Istanbul Medipol University Hospital

The Effect of an Individually Adapted Lumbosacral Orthosis on Plantar Pressure and Balance in Individuals With Low Back Pain

The aim of this study is to examine the effect of steel underwire lumbosacral orthosis adapted to the individual by the prosthetist orthotist on pain, comfort, plantar pressure, static and dynamic balance in individuals with low back pain.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The aim of this study is to examine the effect of steel underwire lumbosacral orthosis adapted to the individual by the prosthetist orthotist on pain, comfort, plantar pressure, static and dynamic balance in individuals with low back pain. Thirty male and female volunteers between the ages of 18-65 who came to Istanbul Medipol University Prosthesis Orthotics Center and experienced low back pain were included in the study.

The study will be designed as Crossover. The study consists of three methods and a single group, which are orthosis-free, worn by a person with low back pain, and adapted by a prosthetist orthotist. Following both orthosis insertion methods, pain severity will be measured with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and comfort level was measured with Orthosis Comfort Score. They will be asked to wait for 30 minutes with orthosis, and then the pain severity and comfort level were measured again. Y Balance Test (YBT) and Functional Reach Test (FRT) will be used for dynamic balance. Plantar pressure and static balance will be analyzed with pedobarography device. Static Pressure and stabilometric data will be found.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Istanbul, Turkey
        • Istanbul Medipol University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Between the ages of 18-65,
  • One or more recurrent low back pain during the last 12 months,-At least 6 points on the Oswestry Disability Index,
  • Negative straight leg raising test result,
  • Not having any lower extremity injuries in the last 6 months,
  • No history of recent trauma or infection

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neurological symptoms due to nerve root compression
  • One-sided leg pain more severe than lower back pain, pain in feet and toes shooting pain, numbness in the same area, paresthesia,
  • Disease that causes neurological sequelae (stroke, traumatic brain injury, Parkinson's, Those who have had it (such as multiple sclerosis),
  • Presence of malignancy,

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: First Intervention
The application will be done sequentially: without orthosis, with adaptation and with orthosis.
Firstly, For individuals with low back pain, all measurements will be evaluated without wearing any orthosis. The waist circumference of individuals with low back pain will be measured and the orthosis was adapted to the appropriate orthosis size by the prosthetist orthotist. After waiting with the orthosis for half an hour, the measurements will be repeated. Then, the person will be asked to wear the orthosis without any intervention.
Experimental: Second Intervention
The application will be done sequentially: with adaptation, with orthosis and without orthosis
Firstly, The waist circumference of individuals with low back pain will be measured and the orthosis will be adapted to the appropriate orthosis size by the prosthetist orthotist. After waiting with the orthosis for half an hour, the person will be asked to wear the orthosis without any intervention and the outcome measurements will be repeated. After waiting with the orthosis for half an hour, all measurements will be evaluated without wearing any orthosis.
Experimental: Third Intervention
The application will be done sequentially: with orthosis, without orthosis, and with adaptation
Firstly, the person will be asked to wear the orthosis without any intervention and the outcome measurements will be done. The waist circumference of individuals with low back pain will be measured and the orthosis will be adapted to the appropriate orthosis size by the prosthetist orthotist. After waiting with the orthosis for half an hour, all measurements will be evaluated without wearing any orthosis. Lastly, The waist circumference of individuals with low back pain will be measured and the orthosis will be adapted to the appropriate orthosis size by the prosthetist orthotis. After waiting with the orthosis for half an hour, all measurements will be evaluated.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analog scale
Time Frame: 5 minutes
A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is one of the pain rating scales used for the first time in 1921 by Hayes and Patterson[1]. It is often used in epidemiologic and clinical research to measure the intensity or frequency of various symptoms. For example, the amount of pain that a patient feels ranges across a continuum from none to an extreme amount of pain. From the patient's perspective, this spectrum appears continuous; their pain does not take discrete jumps, as a categorization of none, mild, moderate and severe would suggest. It was to capture this idea of an underlying continuum that the VAS was devised
5 minutes
Orthosis comfort score
Time Frame: 10 minutes
An orthosis comfort score, which is valid and reliable and developed from the socket comfort score, will be used to evaluate comfort. The score measures the comfort felt by the patient between values of 0 and 10. "How would you rate the comfort of the orthosis?" They are expected to answer the question as 0 is the most uncomfortable orthosis and 10 is the most comfortable orthosis.
10 minutes
Functional Reach Test (FRT)
Time Frame: 5 minutes
Functional Reach Test (FRT) is a assessment tool for ascertaining dynamic balance in in simple task. In standing, measures the distance between the length of an outstretched arm in a maximal forward reach, while maintaining a fixed base of support. This information is correlated with risk of falling.
5 minutes
Pedobarographic evaluation
Time Frame: 5 minutes
Foot plantar pressure distribution (static pedobarographic) analyzes and postural stability parameters will be performed through a computer-aided data collection and display system. Sensor Medica (Rome, Italy) Pedobarography Device, which has a pressure-sensitive platform connected to the computer and a software system that records and analyzes the data. Measurements will be made for individuals with low back pain.
5 minutes
Y balance test
Time Frame: 15 minutes
Y Balance Test, strength, flexibility, filter control and proprioception.Taking a one-legged stand is a reliable test for exercising dynamic balance. Three-way reach carries out operations of individuals of individuals. They were asked to lie down to the last magnification without disrupting the alignment with the side to be tested and to return to the center after each stretch. After trial access, access was requested in three directions. Measurements are fired with 10-second breaks between trials and 20-second breaks between directions. The reach made after 3 reach attempts for each direction was measured and taken into the recording area, and the test was used in the overall performance analysis.
15 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Merve Yilmaz Menek, PhD, Medipol University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 4, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 4, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 4, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 1, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • E-10840098-772.02-4659

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

There is not a plan to make IPD available.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain, Postural

Clinical Trials on First Intervention

Subscribe