A Socio-ecological Approach for Improving Self-management in Adolescents With SCD (SC-Thrive)

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the impact of SCThrive (a behavioral self-management intervention) on patient activation, self-management behaviors, daily functioning, and emergency room visits in 260 adolescents and young adults with sickle cell disease (SCD) ages 13-21 receiving care at 1 of 4 pediatric SCD clinics.

The main question[s]it aims to answer are:

  • Does SCThrive improve patient activation?
  • Does SCThrive improve self-management behaviors, daily functioning, and decrease emergency room visits?
  • Are any improvements maintained 3 months after treatment?

Participants will complete self-management related surveys before, after, and 3 months following their participation in an 8- week, virtual group intervention with an accompanying mobile app (SCThrive).

Researchers will compare outcomes for participants who receive SCThrive and participants who receive uniform standard care (SCHealthED which = standard of care plus SCD educational text messages) to see if there are differences in patient activation, self-management behaviors, daily functioning, and emergency room visits.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

The research team's pilot work demonstrated improved patient activation (knowledge, skills, and self-efficacy) and self-management behaviors in adolescents and young adults (AYA) with sickle cell disease (SCD) compared to a control condition. Further analyses revealed that participants who used the app more frequently showed greater improvements. Thus, this study will maximize the clinical benefit of SCThrive by 1) adding app engagement strategies, 2) conducting a more systematic assessment of barriers including social contributors to health, and 3) integrating ways to address these barriers into the intervention.

Study Aims: The aims are to examine the impact of SCThrive on patient activation (primary outcome; Aim 1) and self-management behaviors, daily functioning, and emergency room visits (secondary outcomes) at post-treatment and follow-up (Aim 2). It is hypothesized that adolescents randomized to SCThrive will have greater improvement in patient activation (primary outcome) compared to those randomized to uniform standard care (control condition). The research team will also explore the relationship between social determinants of health (SDOH)-related barriers (e.g., stigma, access to care) and treatment response (i.e., patient activation and self-management behaviors).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

310

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Delaware
      • Wilmington, Delaware, United States, 19803
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Nemours Children's Health
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Aimee Hildenbrand, PhD
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30303
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Soumitri Sil, PhD
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45229
        • Recruiting
        • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Lori Crosby, PsyD
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Lisa Schwartz, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient of a participating SCD Clinic
  • Confirmed diagnosis of SCD
  • 13-21 years of age

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Another chronic disease (which would complicate measurement of patient activation)
  • Non-English-speaking
  • Cognitive or psychiatric disorder that the physician or study therapists believe would impair study participation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Active Treatment
SCThrive is a virtual, 8-week, virtual group-based, behavioral self-management intervention that includes daily use of a companion mobile app.
SCThrive is a virtual, 8-week, virtual group-based, behavioral self-management intervention that includes daily use of a companion mobile app.
Placebo Comparator: Control Condition
Participants randomized to SCHealthED will receive usual care plus 7 text messages consisting of SCD educational facts to ensure the care is uniform across sites.
Standard of care plus 7 SCD educational text messages to ensure education is uniform across sites
Other Names:
  • Uniform Standard Care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Activation
Time Frame: baseline, up to 4 weeks after treatment ends, 3 to 4 months after treatment ends
Self-reported patient activation as measured by the Patient Activation Measure -13 (PAM-13), which is a 13 item measure on skills, knowledge, confidence and readiness for self-management developed by Hibbard et al., 2005. Items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale of 1 = "Disagree Strongly" to 3 = "Strongly Agree." Raw scores range from 13 to 52 and are converted to scores that range from 0 to 100. This score was then divided into four levels of activation, which reflect a developmental progression from being passive with regard to one's health to being proactive: Level 1 (score of 0.0 - 47.0), Level 2 (47.1 - 55.1), Level 3 (55.2 - 72.4), and Level 4 (72.5 - 100). Higher scores indicate more behavioral activation.
baseline, up to 4 weeks after treatment ends, 3 to 4 months after treatment ends

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-Management Behaviors
Time Frame: baseline, up to 4 weeks after treatment ends, 3 to 4 months after treatment ends
self-reported self-management behaviors as measured by the Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire - 6 (TRAQ-6), which is a well-validated 20-item questionnaire that measures the skills needed to manage a chronic condition independently. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale of 1 = "No, I do not know how" to 5 = "Yes, I always do this when I need to" and divided into 5 subscales: Managing Medication, Appointment Keeping, Tracking Health Issues, Talking with Providers, and Managing Daily Activities. Overall and subscale scores are calculated by averaging the scores of answered items. Mean scores range from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating better self-management.
baseline, up to 4 weeks after treatment ends, 3 to 4 months after treatment ends
Daily Functioning
Time Frame: baseline, up to 4 weeks after treatment ends, 3 to 4 months after treatment ends
The Functional Disability Inventory is a self-report measure of limitations in children's physical and psychosocial functioning due to their physical health. The instrument consists of 15 items concerning activity limitations due to "being sick or not feeling well" during the past 2 weeks. Total scores ranging from 0 to 60 are computed by summing the ratings for each of the 15 items on the FDI. Higher scores indicate greater perceived functional disability.
baseline, up to 4 weeks after treatment ends, 3 to 4 months after treatment ends
Emergency Room (ER) Visits
Time Frame: 6 months prior to treatment; 6 months post-treatment
number of emergency room visits
6 months prior to treatment; 6 months post-treatment
Self-Management Skills
Time Frame: baseline, up to 4 weeks after treatment ends, 3 to 4 months after treatment ends
Participants complete the UNC TRxANSITION Scale, an interview administered by trained independent evaluators to measure the skills of youth with chronic conditions. For this study, we will administer 6 of the 10 possible subscales: Type of Chronic Health Condition, Medications, Adherence, Nutrition, Self-Management Skills, and New Health Care Providers. Each item is scored individually as either 1 (adequate knowledge/skill mastery), 0.5 (some knowledge/skill attainment), or 0 (no knowledge/skill attainment). Higher scores indicate better self-management. Subscale scores are calculated by dividing the patient's score by the total possible subscale score. Subscale scores are then combined to create a total score, ranging from 0 to 10, but since we will only use 6 scales, 0 to 6. Total and subscale proportion scores will be used in analyses.
baseline, up to 4 weeks after treatment ends, 3 to 4 months after treatment ends
Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: baseline, up to 4 weeks after treatment ends, 3 to 4 months after treatment ends
Patient report of sickle cell disease (SCD)-specific quality of life (QOL) and pain, as measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) SCD Module, which assesses several domains of health-related quality of life (HRQOL), including pain impact, fatigue, pain management, emotions, communication, and treatment adherence. Total score only. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher HRQOL or higher functioning.
baseline, up to 4 weeks after treatment ends, 3 to 4 months after treatment ends

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lori E. Crosby, PsyD, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 3, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 15, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 29, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 11, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Only de-identified data will be shared with other researchers. Deidentified data sets will be available on the Open Science Framework.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anemia, Sickle Cell

Clinical Trials on SCThrive

Subscribe