Network Pharmacology Prediction: Mechanism Study of Puerarin in the Treatment of Giant Cell Tumors of Bone

March 30, 2024 updated by: Changye Zou

Treatment of Giant Cell Bone Tumor With Purerin: New Insights From Network Pharmacology, Bioinformatics Analysis, and Experimental Verification

Based on network pharmacology analysis, this study aims to explore the potential therapeutic targets and molecular mechanisms of puerarin on giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) genes.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The giant cell tumor of bone's pathological genes were discovered from DisGeNET and GeneCards databases. The therapeutic genes of puerarin were gathered from Swiss Target Prediction, CTD(Comparative Toxicogenomics Database), PharmMapper, and TCMSP databases (Traditional Chinese Medicine Systems Pharmacology Database and Analysis Platform). Cytoscape software was used with the MCODE algorithm to calculate key potential therapeutic targets of puerarin against GCTB. The bulk RNA-seq datasets (GSE102193) were used to identify differential expression of potential therapeutic genes. The sc RNA-seq (GSE168664) was utilized to determine the expression distribution of different cell clusters. Essential targets of puerarin against GCTB underwent function and pathway enrichment assays to elucidate biological processes and signaling pathways. Furthermore, the investigators conducted a comparison to determine if the primary biological processes and pathways following denosumab treatment exhibit resemblances to the potential mechanisms of puerarin action. Molecular docking and dynamics simulation were conducted to evaluate interactions between selected potential therapeutic targets and puerarin. Immunohistochemical (IHC) and immunofluorescence (IF) staining were performed to identify the expression of crucial markers in human GCTB tissue. Expression levels of pivotal genes in primary BMSC cells and primary GCTB cells and their alteration following puerarin treatment in primary GCTB cells were evaluated.The significance of differences between groups was estimated by the Student t-test or Wilcoxon test. In all the statistical analyses, data with two-tailed p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

145

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 518010
        • Churong Yan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

1st hospital of SYSU provides diagnosis and treatment that meets the inclusion criteria.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosed as a patient with giant cell tumor of bone;
  2. Performing surgical treatment in 1st hospital of SYSU;
  3. Having complete clinical registration information;
  4. Preserve surgical or puncture specimens;

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Non bone giant cell tumor patients;
  2. No surgical treatment was performed;
  3. Incomplete clinical information registration;
  4. No preserved surgical or puncture specimens.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
P27 expression groups
12 immunohistochemical sections were scored under the microscope (staining intensity scores: negative 0 points, weak 1 point, medium 2 points, strong 3 points; positive cell frequency scores: less than 5% 0 points, 2-25% 1 point, 26-50% 2 points, 51-75% 3 points, greater than 75% 4 points).
12 immunohistochemical sections were scored under the microscope (staining intensity scores: negative 0 points, weak 1 point, medium 2 points, strong 3 points; positive cell frequency scores: less than 5% 0 points, 2-25% 1 point, 26-50% 2 points, 51-75% 3 points, greater than 75% 4 points).
ESR1 expression groups
12 immunohistochemical sections were scored under the microscope (staining intensity scores: negative 0 points, weak 1 point, medium 2 points, strong 3 points; positive cell frequency scores: less than 5% 0 points, 2-25% 1 point, 26-50% 2 points, 51-75% 3 points, greater than 75% 4 points).
12 immunohistochemical sections were scored under the microscope (staining intensity scores: negative 0 points, weak 1 point, medium 2 points, strong 3 points; positive cell frequency scores: less than 5% 0 points, 2-25% 1 point, 26-50% 2 points, 51-75% 3 points, greater than 75% 4 points).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
P27 expression levels
Time Frame: 2023-05-18 - 2023-08-31
12 immunohistochemical sections were scored under the microscope (staining intensity scores: negative 0 points, weak 1 point, medium 2 points, strong 3 points; positive cell frequency scores: less than 5% 0 points, 2-25% 1 point, 26-50% 2 points, 51-75% 3 points, greater than 75% 4 points).
2023-05-18 - 2023-08-31
ESR1 expression levels
Time Frame: 2023-05-18 - 2023-08-31
12 immunohistochemical sections were scored under the microscope (staining intensity scores: negative 0 points, weak 1 point, medium 2 points, strong 3 points; positive cell frequency scores: less than 5% 0 points, 2-25% 1 point, 26-50% 2 points, 51-75% 3 points, greater than 75% 4 points).
2023-05-18 - 2023-08-31

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Changye Zou, MD, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 14, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 19, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The datasets are available from the corresponding author (zouchy@mail.sysu.edu.cn) on reasonable request after SCI online.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

SCI online. The datasets are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The datasets are available from the corresponding author (zouchy@mail.sysu.edu.cn) on reasonable request after SCI online.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Giant Cell Tumors

Clinical Trials on gene expression levels

Subscribe