- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07499362
Study of Pimicotinib in Japanese Participants With Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (TGCT) (J-MANEUVER)
May 26, 2026 updated by: Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
Phase 2, Single-arm Study to Investigate the Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy, and Safety of Pimicotinib in Japanese Participants With Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor
The primary purpose of this study is to assess the tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of pimicotinib in Japanese participants with TGCT
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The purpose of this study is to assess the tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy, and safety of pimicotinib in Japanese participants with TGCT in two cohorts: Safety Run-in and Expansion.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
20
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Communication Center
- Phone Number: +49 6151 72 5200
- Email: service@emdgroup.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Fukuoka, Japan
- Recruiting
- Kyushu University Hospital - 300173484
-
Nagoya, Japan
- Recruiting
- Nagoya University Hospital - 300176284
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Japanese participants with a diagnosis of TGCT that has been histologically confirmed at the local laboratory and is unresectable (that is [i.e.] it is located in a complex anatomical site, extensively invasive, and cannot be completely resected; or a surgical operation may cause dysfunction or serious complications). Symptomatic disease because of active TGCT, defined as a worst pain of greater than or equal to [>=] 4 within 2 weeks prior to enrollment (based on scale of 0 to 10, with 10 representing "pain as bad as you can imagine"), and/or a worst stiffness of >= 4 within 2 weeks prior to first dose of pimicotinib (based on a scale of 0 to 10, with 10 representing "stiffness as bad as you can imagine")
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status less than or equal to [<=] 1
- Participants with adequate hepatic, renal hematologic functions
- Other protocol defined inclusion criteria may apply
Exclusion Criteria:
- Known additional malignancy that required active treatment and may affect the participant's participation in the study or affect the outcome of the study as assessed by the Investigator. Exceptions include cured basal cell carcinoma of skin, squamous cell carcinoma of skin, and other carcinoma in situ
- Serious gastrointestinal bleeding within 3 months of first dose of pimicotinib or factors that significantly affected the absorption of oral drug, such as inability to take oral medication or significant nausea and vomiting, malabsorption, external bile duct drainage, massive small-bowel resection, etc.
- Impaired cardiac function or clinically significant cardiac disease, including any one of the following: New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV heart disease, active ischemia or any other uncontrolled cardiac condition such as angina pectoris, clinically significant cardiac arrhythmia requiring therapy, uncontrolled hypertension or congestive heart failure; prolongation of the rate corrected QT interval based on repeated demonstration of QT interval corrected using Fridericia's formula (QTcF) greater than (>) 480 milliseconds (ms), or history of long QT interval corrected (QTc) syndrome; Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than (<) 50 percent (%) or below the lower limit of normal, whichever is higher
- Cerebrovascular accident/stroke (within 6 months of first dose of pimicotinib)
- Other protocol defined exclusion criteria may apply
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Safety Run-In followed by Expansion Cohort: Pimicotinib
|
In the Safety Run-in Cohort, participants will receive 50 milligrams (mg) of pimicotinib once daily (QD), orally in 28-day cycles until disease progression (DP), death, discontinuation, or any other reason.
The Safety Monitoring Committee (SMC) will monitor and assess tolerability of pimicotinib 50 mg QD during the safety run-in cohort.
After making a recommendation about opening the Expansion Cohort based on the assessment in safety run-in cohort, participants will receive 50 mg of pimicotinib monotherapy QD, orally in 28-day cycles until disease progression (DP), death, discontinuation, or any other reason.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Safety Run-In Cohort: Number of Participants with Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT)-like events
Time Frame: Day 1 up to Day 28 of Cycle 1 (each cycle is of 28 days)
|
Day 1 up to Day 28 of Cycle 1 (each cycle is of 28 days)
|
|
Safety Run-In Cohort: Pharmacokinetic (PK) Plasma Concentration of Pimicotinib
Time Frame: Pre-dose up to 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 1 Day 15 (each cycle is of 28 days)
|
Pre-dose up to 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 1 Day 15 (each cycle is of 28 days)
|
|
Objective Response (OR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) as Assessed by Independent Review Committee
Time Frame: Time from first study treatment until progressive disease or death, assessed up to approximately 2 years
|
Time from first study treatment until progressive disease or death, assessed up to approximately 2 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Objective Response (OR) According to Tumor Volume Score (TVS) as Assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC)
Time Frame: Time from first study treatment until progressive disease or death, assessed up to approximately 2 years
|
Time from first study treatment until progressive disease or death, assessed up to approximately 2 years
|
|
|
Objective Response (OR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) as assessed by Investigator
Time Frame: Time from first study treatment until progressive disease or death, assessed up to approximately 2 years
|
Time from first study treatment until progressive disease or death, assessed up to approximately 2 years
|
|
|
Mean Change from Baseline in Range of Motion (ROM) at Week 25
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 25
|
The ROM of the affected joint or tumor site will be assessed using a goniometer.
Measurements will be recorded in degrees.
|
Baseline, Week 25
|
|
Mean Change from Baseline in Worst-Stiffness-Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 25
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 25
|
Baseline, Week 25
|
|
|
Mean Change from Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)- Worst-Stiffness-Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 25
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 25
|
Baseline, Week 25
|
|
|
Mean Change from Baseline in Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Functioning Score at Week 25
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 25
|
The PROMIS Physical Function scale is measured using a series of questions assessing a person's ability to perform various physical tasks, with responses scored on a 5-point Likert scale.
The raw score from these responses is then converted to a standardized T-score on a scale of 0 to 100, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10.
The total score is the final T-score.
|
Baseline, Week 25
|
|
Duration of Response (DOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) as Assessed by Independent Review Committee
Time Frame: Time from first documentation of objective response until progressive disease (PD) or death, assessed approximately up to 2 years
|
Time from first documentation of objective response until progressive disease (PD) or death, assessed approximately up to 2 years
|
|
|
Duration of Response (DOR) According to Tumor Volume Score (TVS) as Assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC)
Time Frame: Time from first documentation of objective response until progressive disease (PD) or death, assessed approximately up to 2 years
|
Time from first documentation of objective response until progressive disease (PD) or death, assessed approximately up to 2 years
|
|
|
Duration of Response (DOR) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) as assessed by Investigator
Time Frame: Time from first documentation of objective response until progressive disease (PD) or death, assessed approximately up to 2 years
|
Time from first documentation of objective response until progressive disease (PD) or death, assessed approximately up to 2 years
|
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in European Quality Of Life 5-dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) Health Scale Score at Week 25
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 25
|
The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire is a standardized instrument used as a measure of health outcome.
The 5-dimension health status measure evaluates: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression based on a 5-level scale: 1: no problems, 2: slight problems, 3: moderate problems, 4: severe problems, 5: an extreme problem.
Higher scores (closer to 5) indicate worse health status.
|
Baseline, Week 25
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 25
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 25
|
The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire is a standardized instrument used as a measure of health outcome.
The VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical VAS where the endpoints are labelled 'Worst imaginable health state' and 'Best imaginable health state'.
VAS ranges from 0 to 100.
Higher scores indicate better perceived health.
|
Baseline, Week 25
|
|
Number of Participants with Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Related Adverse Events
Time Frame: Time from first study treatment, assessed up to approximately 2 years
|
Time from first study treatment, assessed up to approximately 2 years
|
|
|
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Pimicotinib
Time Frame: Pre-dose up to 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 1 Day 15 (each cycle is of 28 days)
|
Pre-dose up to 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 1 Day 15 (each cycle is of 28 days)
|
|
|
Accumulation Ratio for Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration [Racc(Cmax)] of Pimicotinib After Repeated Administration
Time Frame: Pre-dose up to 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15 (each cycle is of 28 days)
|
Pre-dose up to 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15 (each cycle is of 28 days)
|
|
|
Accumulation Ratio of Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve from Time Zero to 24 Hours (AUC0-24) of Pimicotinib After Repeated Administration
Time Frame: Pre-dose up to 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15 (each cycle is of 28 days)
|
Pre-dose up to 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15 (each cycle is of 28 days)
|
|
|
Plasma Concentration Observed at the End of a Dosing Interval Immediately before Next Dosing (Ctrough) of Pimicotinib
Time Frame: Pre-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15 (each cycle is of 28 days)
|
Pre-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15 (each cycle is of 28 days)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Director: Medical Responsible, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
March 26, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
November 22, 2029
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 22, 2029
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 23, 2026
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 23, 2026
First Posted (Actual)
March 30, 2026
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
May 28, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 26, 2026
Last Verified
May 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- MS265601_0008
- jRCT2071250149 (Other Identifier: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (JRCT))
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
We are committed to enhancing public health through responsible sharing of clinical trial data.
Following approval of a new product or a new indication for an approved product in both the US and European Union, the study sponsor and/or its affiliated companies will share study protocols, anonymized patient data and study level data, and redacted clinical study reports with qualified scientific and medical researchers, upon request, as necessary for conducting legitimate research.
Further information on how to request data can be found on our website bit.ly/IPD21
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Within six months after the approval of a new product or a new indication for an approved product in both the United States and the European Union.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Qualified scientific and medical researchers can request the data.
Such requests must be submitted in writing to the company's portal and will be internally reviewed regarding criteria for researchers' qualification and legitimacy of the research proposal.
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ANALYTIC_CODE
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor
-
Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, LLCActive, not recruitingTenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor | Giant Cell Tumor of Tendon Sheath | Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis | Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor, Diffuse | Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor, LocalizedNorway, United States, France, Spain, Hong Kong, Canada, Netherlands, Italy, Germany, Australia, United Kingdom, Poland, Switzerland
-
Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, LLCActive, not recruitingAdvanced Malignant Neoplasm | Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor | Giant Cell Tumor of Tendon Sheath | Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis | Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor, DiffuseUnited States, France, Spain, Canada, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy, Australia, Poland
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsCompletedPigmented Villonodular Synovitis | PVNS | Giant Cell Tumor of the Tendon Sheath | GCCTS | Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor Localized or Diffused Type | GCTSUnited States, Switzerland
-
Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth...RecruitingTenosynovial Giant Cell TumorChina
-
Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.Active, not recruitingTenosynovial Giant Cell TumorTaiwan, China
-
Andrew J. Wagner, MD, PhDMassachusetts General Hospital; Novartis; Brigham and Women's HospitalCompletedTenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor | Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis | Diffuse-type Giant Cell TumorUnited States
-
Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, LLCRecruitingTenosynovial Giant Cell TumorUnited States
-
Daiichi SankyoRecruitingTenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor | HepatotoxicityUnited States
-
Abbisko Therapeutics Co, LtdRecruitingNeoplasms | Tenosynovial Giant Cell TumorChina, United States
-
Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.OptimapharmCompletedGiant Cell TumorsUnited States, France, Spain, Netherlands, Italy, Austria, United Kingdom, Germany
Clinical Trials on Pimicotinib
-
Abbisko Therapeutics Co, LtdCompletedPharmacokinetics in Healthy VolunteersChina
-
Abbisko Therapeutics Co, LtdCompleted
-
Abbisko Therapeutics Co, LtdCompleted
-
Abbisko Therapeutics Co, LtdActive, not recruiting
-
Abbisko Therapeutics Co, LtdCompleted
-
Abbisko Therapeutics Co, LtdActive, not recruitingTenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor | Giant Cell Tumor of Tendon Sheath | Pigmented Villonodular SynovitisSpain, China, United States, Netherlands, Canada, Italy, Poland
-
Abbisko Therapeutics Co, LtdCompleted
-
Abbisko Therapeutics Co, LtdRecruitingAdvanced Pancreatic CancerChina