Assessment of Sedation Depth Using Processed EEG in ICU Patients With ARDS Receiving Neuromuscular Blockade: A Prospective Observational Study"

June 7, 2025 updated by: Aykut Saritas, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital
"In intensive care units, therapeutic paralysis has been a routine treatment method for many years in a select group of patients. Sufficient and appropriate sedation in patients undergoing therapeutic paralysis is crucial to prevent awareness and reduce the risk of excessive sedation. Both inadequate and excessive sedation levels can be highly detrimental to the patient. Clinical assessment may not always provide accurate information regarding sedation depth. Recently, the frequency and workload of therapeutic paralysis treatment in intensive care units have increased due to COVID-19 pneumonia. Therefore, the investigators believe that inadequate sedation may be common in these patients. Processed electroencephalogram parameters such as bispectral index or patient state index (PSI), routinely used in operating rooms and intensive care units, are commonly used to indicate sedation depth. In this study, the investigators aimed to determine sedation levels in patients during paralysis, assess the prevalence of inadequate or excessive sedation, and observe the doses of sedatives and analgesics used."

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

52

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • İzmir
      • İ̇zmi̇r, İzmir, Turkey, 35640
        • Aykut Saritaş

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Intensive care unit patients who has ARDS

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • "Patients aged 18 years and older who have received continuous neuromuscular blocking agents for at least 24 hours."

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients under 18 years of age,
  2. pregnant individuals
  3. trauma patients,
  4. intracerebral pathology
  5. major bleeding
  6. central nervous system diseases,
  7. pre-existing poor neurological condition before admission to the intensive care unit,
  8. inability to document continuous neuromuscular blocking agent infusion for at least 24 hours."

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To determine the sedation levels of patients during paralysis
Time Frame: For patients undergoing therapeutic paralysis, over a 24-hour period,"
"In the study, for patients undergoing therapeutic paralysis, routinely applied non-invasive patient state index (0-100) values will be recorded. These recorded values will be blindedly recorded from the clinician, who will not be alerted or intervene based on the values."
For patients undergoing therapeutic paralysis, over a 24-hour period,"
The prevalence of inadequate or excessive sedation,
Time Frame: For patients undergoing therapeutic paralysis, over a 24-hour period,"
"In the study, for patients undergoing therapeutic paralysis, routinely applied non-invasive patient state index (0-100) values will be recorded. These recorded values will be blindedly recorded from the clinician, who will not be alerted or intervene based on the values."
For patients undergoing therapeutic paralysis, over a 24-hour period,"

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of Concordance Between Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS),
Time Frame: The assessment process conducted immediately before the application of paralysis."
Evaluation of Concordance Between Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale [(+4)- (-5)], a scale used in clinical assessment.
The assessment process conducted immediately before the application of paralysis."

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 17, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

April 24, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 17, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 29, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 11, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sedation Complication

Clinical Trials on Depth of sedation monitoring

Subscribe