Is Density Spectral Array Display Along With Bispectral Index Superior to the Display of Bispectral Index Alone (DSA-Light)

November 13, 2025 updated by: The University of Queensland

Is DSA Display Along With Bispectral Index Superior to the Display of Bispectral Index Alone in Detecting Emergence From Propofol and Opiate Anesthesia? A Prospective Observational Study in Patients Older Than 65 Years?

A study to evaluate the use of density spectral array display in comparison with Bispectral index in a clinical setting.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) is a popular general anesthesia (GA) technique with an increased risk of unintended awareness under GA, which can be a devastating and life-changing complication. Age-related changes may impact the performance of EEG-derived depth of anesthesia indices in those older than 65 years, particularly in the presence of cognitive disorders.

Hypothesis: In comparison to monitor 1 (BIS only), monitor 2 (DSA + BIS) will have higher sensitivity and specificity to detect recovery

Objectives:

Investigators will prospectively measure the sensitivity and specificity of monitor 1 versus monitor 2 in patients older than 65 years receiving propofol-based TIVA.

Methods:

Investigators will recruit 70 participants from the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (RBWH) who are aged 65 years or older and scheduled for elective endovascular or endoscopic urologic procedures.

Investigators aim to determine whether the display of DSA can enhance the sensitivity and specificity of depth of anesthesia monitors in detecting sudden changes in anesthetic depth in older patients. This may enhance the detection of inadequate administration or delivery of propofol and may lower the incidence of unintended awareness under general anesthesia in that age group.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

70

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Queensland
      • Herston, Queensland, Australia, 4006
        • Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Victoria Eley, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Andre Van Zundert, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Alison Mudge, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jamie Sleigh, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

• Age ≥ 65 years undergoing elective procedures of 1-3 hours' duration requiring GA at RBWH

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 65 years undergoing elective procedures of 1-3 hours' duration requiring GA.
  • Procedures in which a DoA monitor can be applied to the forehead.
  • Patients receiving intravenous propofol and opiate anaesthesia using supraglottic airway device.
  • Patient able to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Administration of ketamine/dexmedetomidine.
  • Administration of inhaled anaesthetic agents or nitrous oxide
  • Administration of muscle relaxation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Primary cohort
  • Age ≥ 65 years undergoing elective procedures of 1-3 hours' duration requiring GA.
  • Procedures in which a DoA monitor can be applied to the forehead.
  • Patients receiving intravenous propofol and opiate anesthesia using supraglottic airway device.
  • Patient able to provide informed consent.
Comparison of processed EEG monitor (Bispectral index) with and without Density spectral array

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
aim
Time Frame: In the perioperative period, following the cessation of anesthesia, the patient begins to emerge from a deep anesthetic state to a lighter state and then regains consciousness. The time frame is usually in minutes, but varies depending on various factors
Sensitivity and specificity of Bispectral index combined with density spectral array compared with Bispectral index alone in detection of emergence from general anesthesia. Emergence from anaesthesia manifests in changes in the BIS and/or DSA suggestive of a change in the depth of anesthesia and progress towards regaining consciousness.
In the perioperative period, following the cessation of anesthesia, the patient begins to emerge from a deep anesthetic state to a lighter state and then regains consciousness. The time frame is usually in minutes, but varies depending on various factors
Primary aim
Time Frame: In the perioperative period, time following the cessation of intravenous anesthesia after the procedure; emergence from anesthesia usually takes place over a few minutes to hours.
Evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of Bispectral index combined with density spectral array compared with Bispectral index alone in the detection of the timing of emergence from general anesthesia.
In the perioperative period, time following the cessation of intravenous anesthesia after the procedure; emergence from anesthesia usually takes place over a few minutes to hours.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael Boules, MB BCh, The University of Queensland

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 29, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

November 18, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 18, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

The data collected is owned by Metro North Health and I need their approval before doing so

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Awareness During General Anesthesia

Clinical Trials on Depth of anesthesia monitoring using processed EEG

Subscribe