Analgesic Requirement for Post-Operative Pain Control in TLIP Interbody Fusion

Analgesic Requirement for Post-Operative Pain Control in Elective 1-3 Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block With Exparel to Bupivacaine HCl

The goal of this clinical trail is to to compare the efficacy of thoracolumbar interfascial plane block with Exparel vs with standard of care 0.25% Bupivacaine HCl in patients undergoing 1-3 level elective transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. The investigators hypothesize that thoracolumbar interfascial plane block with Exparel will outperform standard of care (supplemented with interfascial plane block of 0.25% Bupivacaine HCl) with regards to pain reduction, narcotic use, length of hospital stay, time to mobilization with physical therapy, narcotic usage in the hospital, and post operative pain scores.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

76

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33607
        • Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients 18 years or older,
  • Patients admitted to AHC for 1-3 level TLIF,
  • Patients who have given written informed consent,
  • BMI between 18-35 kg/m2,

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with known allergic reactions to standard of care analgesics,
  • Female patients who are pregnant
  • Patients with any previous lumbar spine instrumented surgery,
  • Chronic opioid use within 30 days prior to randomization that exceeds average ≥30 oral morphine equivalents/day,
  • Patients with known allergy to local anesthetics,
  • Patients with known or suspected to have neuromuscular disorders impairing neuromuscular blockade (e.g. myasthenia gravis).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Exparel TLIP Injection
Subjects will receive 20 mL of EXPAREL 266mg mixed with 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine. A total of 30 mL of mixed solution is injected into the thoracolumbar interfacial plane.
20 mL of EXPAREL 266mg mixed with 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine
Active Comparator: Bupivicaine HCL TLIP Injection
Standard of care will consist of 0.25% Bupivacaine HCl TLIP injection. Subjects will receive 30 mL of the solution, injected into the thoracolumbar interfacial plane.
Standard of care will consist of 0.25% Bupivacaine HCl TLIP injection 30mL

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare efficacy of thoracolumbar interfacial plane block with Exparel vs. standard of care (0.25% Bupivacaine HCL) is surgical subjects undergoing 1-3 level elective transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Time Frame: 0-72 hours post-operatively
Data will be analyzed by randomized treatment group to determine efficacy. Superiority of treatment with EXPAREL compared with Bupivacaine hydrochloride will be determined using linear regression adjusting for Pain Catastrophizing Scale with treatment as main effect for the primary efficacy endpoint of area under the curve of the Numerical rating scale pain intensity scores from 0 to 72 hours post-surgery.
0-72 hours post-operatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total Postsurgical opioid consumption
Time Frame: 0-72 hours postoperatively

The following data points will be recorded to further claim the investigators hypothesis of treatment with EXPAREL compared to Bupivacaine hydrochloride.

• Total postsurgical opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents (Oral morphine equivalents) from 0 to 76 hours post-surgery

0-72 hours postoperatively
Time to discharge
Time Frame: 0-72 hours postoperatively
collect hours of hospital stay
0-72 hours postoperatively
Time to ambulation
Time Frame: 0-72 hours postoperatively
collect time ambulated from surgery
0-72 hours postoperatively
Maximum ambulated distance
Time Frame: 0-72 hours postoperatively
Physical Therapy will document the distance subject could ambulate after surgery
0-72 hours postoperatively
Numeric Rating Pain Scale (Physical Therapy)
Time Frame: 0-72 hours postoperatively
Measure pain score (scale of 0-10 with 0 indicates no pain and 10 severe pain) during physical therapy (ambulation)
0-72 hours postoperatively
Numeric Rating Pain Scale
Time Frame: 0-72 hours with additional follow-up at 14 days (first clinic visit)
Numerical rating scale pain intensity scores at 24hour, 36hour, 60hour, and 72hour from the end of surgery and again at the first clinic visit postoperatively (scale of 0-10 with 0 indicates no pain and 10 severe pain)
0-72 hours with additional follow-up at 14 days (first clinic visit)
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time Frame: 0- 14 days postoperatively
10 questions relating to function specific to low back pain given before surgery and collected at 14 day post op visit.
0- 14 days postoperatively
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Time Frame: 0-14 days postoperatively

This scale measures thoughts and feelings that may be associated with pain. it is rated 0-5 with 0 indicating not at all, 1 indicating to a slight degree, 2 indicates a moderate degree, 3 indicates a great degree and 4 idicates all the time.

There are 13 statements that are rated, the ratings are scored to determine where each subject falls in the scale.

0-14 days postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: John Small, MD, Florida Orthopaedic Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 30, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 15, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 8, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Exparel

Subscribe