Comparison of Laparoscopic Herniotomy and Open Herniotomy in Children (Herniotomy)

April 10, 2024 updated by: Muhammad Sharif, King Edward Medical University

Comparison of Laparoscopic Extraperitoneal Closure and Open Herniotomy in Children

All patients of age 6 month to 12 years with inguinal hernia were included in study.

Data was collected on detailed proforma regarding age, sex, side ,operative time, cosmesis , and postoperative complications

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND: The best method of inguinal hernia repair in children continues to be a topic of debate. Although recent data shows that LPEC is superior and safe but no such data exists in our country. Operative time and recurrence are main concerns. Hence, present study is carried out to compare outcome of LPEC versus OHR in children.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome of laparoscopic percutaneous extra-peritoneal closure and open repair for inguinal hernia in children METHODOLOGY: It was a randomized control trial conducted on 66 patients (33 in each group) presented to our hospital with features of Inguinal Hernia. Patients were admitted after confirmation of diagnosis by ultrasound and complete blood count (CBC) was sent. Pre operatively patients were divided in two groups randomly (Open Hernia Repair group, LPEC group) by closed envelope method. Consent was taken from parents regarding inclusion in the study. All demographic data and results were noted down in a proforma. The collected data was entered and analyzed in computer software SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) version 26.0.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

66

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Punjab
      • Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan, 53711
        • Muhammad Sharif

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

All patients of age 6 months to 12 years of either gender having unilateral or bilateral inguinal hernia diagnosed on history, clinical examination and investigations.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with recurrent inguinal hernia, hydrocele, hernia with undescended testes and Sliding hernia diagnosed on history, clinical examination and investigations.
  2. Patients with complicated hernia (e.g. incarcerated ovary), irreducible or obstructed inguinal hernia diagnosed on history, clinical examination and investigations.
  3. Patients who cannot tolerate pneumoperitoneum or general anaesthesia.
  4. Patients with congenital heart disease, other co-morbid conditions.

    -

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group-A: Laparoscopic hernia repair
In group A (33 patients) laparoscopic assisted needle herniotomy was done
In Group A Laparoscopic assisted needle herniotomy was done
Other Names:
  • Laparoscopic herniotomy
Active Comparator: Group B open herniotomy
In group B(33 patients) open herniotomy was done
In Group A Laparoscopic assisted needle herniotomy was done
Other Names:
  • Laparoscopic herniotomy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Operative time
Time Frame: 3 months
Operative time was noted in both groups.
3 months
Recurrence
Time Frame: 3 Month
recurrence was also noted in both groups
3 Month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Muhammad Sharif, king Edward medical university/mayo hospital lahore

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 30, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 10, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

plan to share on demand

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Inguinal Hernia

Clinical Trials on Herniotomy

Subscribe