Evaluation of Security and Efficacy of Medtrum Hybrid Closed Loop System (SEECLOOP)

June 17, 2024 updated by: Medtrum France

Evaluation of Security and Efficacy of Medtrum Hybrid Closed Loop System in Children, Adolescents and Adults With Type 1 Diabetes

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the MEDTRUM Hybrid Closed Loop (HCL) System in children, adolescents, and adults with type 1 diabetes (7-75 years old) in a home setting and to test the function of meal announcement in an extend study.

The main question it aims to answer is :

• Is the Hybrid Closed Loop system superior at increasing the time spent in the target glucose range of 70-180 mg/dL when compared to the Open (manual) Loop system ?

Participants will be :

  • Trained into the use of the Insulin pump MEDTRUM A8 TouchCare® Insulin Management system
  • Randomized to the Open Loop or Closed Loop group
  • Respond to self administered questionnaires : the Hypoglycaemia Fear Survey, the Diabetes Quality of Life Questionnaire, and the Diabetes treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire status

Researchers will compare the time spent in the target glucose range of 70-180 mg/mL during the last 12 weeks of the study between the patients randomised to the Open Loop group and those randomised to the Closed Loop group.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

160

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Angers, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • CHU Angers
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Regis COUTANT
        • Contact:
          • Regis COUTANT
      • Besançon, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • CHU Besançon
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sophie BOROT
        • Contact:
          • Sophie BOROT
      • Bordeaux, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • CHU Bordeaux
        • Contact:
          • Bogdan CATARGI
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Bogdan CATARGI
      • Caen, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • CHU caen
        • Contact:
          • Michael JOUBERT
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Michael JOUBERT
      • Corbeil-Essonnes, France
        • Recruiting
        • Centre Hospitalier Sud-Francilien
        • Contact:
          • Freddy PENFORNIS
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Freddy PENFORNIS
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Thanh-Lan DANG DUY
      • Gonesse, France
        • Recruiting
        • Centre Hospitalier de Gonesse
        • Contact:
          • Jennifer ALLAIN
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jennifer ALLAIN
      • La Rochelle, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Centre Hospitalier Saint-Louis
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Didier GOUET
        • Contact:
          • Didier GOUET
      • Le Creusot, France
        • Recruiting
        • Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu
        • Principal Investigator:
          • sylvaine clavel
        • Contact:
          • sylvaine clavel
      • Lyon, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Hospices Civils de Lyon
        • Contact:
          • Charles Thivolet
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Charles Thivolet
      • Marseille, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Hôpital Européen
        • Contact:
          • Denis RACCAH
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Denis RACCAH
      • Marseille, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Hôpital la Timone
        • Contact:
          • Rachel REYNAUD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Rachel Reynaud
      • Montpellier, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • CHU Montpellier
        • Contact:
          • Fabienne DALLA VALE
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Fabienne DALLA VALE
      • Nantes, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • CHU Nantes
        • Contact:
          • Lucy CHAILLOUS
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Lucy CHAILLOUS
      • Paris, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Hôpital Necker
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jacques BELTRAND
        • Contact:
          • Jacques BELTRAND
      • Paris, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Hôpital Lariboisière
        • Contact:
          • Jean-Pierre RIVELINE
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jean-Pierre RIVELINE
      • Paris, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Hôpital Robert Debré
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Elise Bismuth
        • Contact:
          • Elise Bismuth
      • Toulouse, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Hopital Rangueil
        • Contact:
          • Vincent MELKI
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Vincent MELKI

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Type 1 diabetes subjects with insulin therapy delivered by pump (aged over 7 years), current or previous insulin pump user or patient treated with multiple insulin injections.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients living with Type 1 diabetes:

    • adults aged 18 to 75 years old (included)
    • children/adolescents aged 7 or older
  2. Total daily dose of insulin ≥ 10 units per day & weighing >22 Kg
  3. Patient and their parent(s)/guardian(s) trained and able to count carb
  4. Current or previous insulin pump user or patient treated with multiple insulin injections
  5. Patient glycaemic target is not achieved or suboptimal according to international consensus: HbA1c level equal and greater than 7% and less than 12% at the time of enrolment, or TIR < 70%, or TBR >4%
  6. Any type of rapid insulin with a total daily insulin in the range of 10-60 IU (unauthorized use of insulin supplements by pen injector): Humalog™, Lyumjev (insulin lispro injection), Novorapid (insulin aspart) or FIASP® (" faster insulin aspart ")
  7. Subject and their parent(s)/guardian(s) able to receive and understand study information, give written informed consent, and easily participate to the trial
  8. Subject and their parent(s)/guardian(s) affiliated to the French social security system
  9. Subject and their parent(s)/guardian(s) have the cognitive ability and can successfully operate all study devices and can adhere to the protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient unable to tolerate tape adhesive, catheter or had any unresolved adverse skin condition and intolerance to steel
  2. Patient not willing to perform finger stick blood glucose measurements required by the system and/or routine diabetes management
  3. Patient with behaviour/lifestyle not compatible with optimal management of insulin therapy or deemed to be at significant risk of severe events (e.g. severe hypoglycaemia, diabetic ketoacidosis)
  4. Unstable diabetic retinopathy
  5. Pregnant women or planning to become pregnant during the study or breast-feeding
  6. Patient abusing alcohol
  7. Patient using DPP-4 inhibitor, GLP-1 agonists, metformin, or SGLT2 inhibitors during the last 3 months prior screening
  8. Patient already participating in another interventional study
  9. Patient currently using a hybrid closed loop system or patient who has stopped usage of Hybrid Closed loop system for less than 3 months
  10. Patient under the protection of justice or under guardianship or curatorship, or hospitalised under duress or admitted to a health or social care establishment for purposes other than those of this investigation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Open Loop
Patients using the Insulin Management System device in a manual mode of operation. Patient must use the interface directly to deliver insulin. The algorithm will not be activated.

MEDTRUM A8 TouchCare® Insulin Management system which includes:

  • Patch pump: Pump base integrated with Hybrid Close Loop (HCL) algorithm not activated
  • Reservoir Patches
  • Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM): Glucose Sensor + Transmitter
  • Personal Diabetes Manager (PDM) and/or EasyPatch® App
  • EasyFollow® App, EasyView® website System is in conformity with EC marking n° HD 601 357 110001- TUV Rheinland dated February 19th of year 2019 and completed by system DoC 881160 dated June 30th of year 2020.

EasyPatch mobile application is in conformity with EC marking n°709972 - BSI - dated March 6th 2020

Closed Loop

Patients using the Insulin Management System device in the Closed Loop mode of operation. The algorithm will be activated. The algorithm is capable of delivery of insulin based on sensor derived glucose levels, glucose level trends and insulin pump delivery history.

Patients in this group can continue to an exploratory phase for the Automatic Meal Management function.

MEDTRUM A8 TouchCare® Insulin Management system which includes:

  • Patch pump: Pump base integrated with Hybrid Close Loop (HCL) algorithm activated
  • Reservoir Patches
  • Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM): Glucose Sensor + Transmitter
  • Personal Diabetes Manager (PDM) and/or EasyPatch® App
  • EasyFollow® App, EasyView® website System is in conformity with EC marking n° HD 601 357 110001- TUV Rheinland dated February 19th of year 2019 and completed by system DoC 881160 dated June 30th of year 2020.

EasyPatch mobile application is in conformity with EC marking n°709972 - BSI - dated March 6th 2020

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Superiority of the algorithm on Time In Range (TIR) between the 2 randomised groups
Time Frame: V5 (6 months)
Comparison between the 2 groups of the proportion of time spent in the target glucose range of 70-180 mg/dL based on sensor measured glucose concentrations during last 12 weeks of the study
V5 (6 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evolution of TIR
Time Frame: V1 (Inclusion), V2 (Randomisation), V3 (1 month), V4 (3 months), V5 (6 months)
Evolution of the time spent in the target glucose range of 70-180 mg/dL based on sensor measured glucose concentrations between visits V1-V2, V2-V4, V2-V5, in each group
V1 (Inclusion), V2 (Randomisation), V3 (1 month), V4 (3 months), V5 (6 months)
Evolution of coefficient of glycemic variation
Time Frame: V1 (Inclusion), V2 (Randomisation), V3 (1 month), V4 (3 months), V5 (6 months)
Evolution of coefficient of glycemic variation (CV) between visits V1-V2, V2-V4, V2-V5, and over the last 12 weeks period of the study, in each group
V1 (Inclusion), V2 (Randomisation), V3 (1 month), V4 (3 months), V5 (6 months)
Superiority in Glycated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) improvement
Time Frame: V2 (Randomisation), V5 (6 months)
Comparison between the 2 groups of the HbA1c change between visits V2 and V5
V2 (Randomisation), V5 (6 months)
Evolution of Time spent Above Range (TAR)
Time Frame: V1 (Inclusion), V2 (Randomisation), V3 (1 month), V4 (3 months), V5 (6 months)
Evolution of the time spent >180 mg/dL and >250 mg/dL, between visits V1-V2, V2-V4, V2-V5, and over the last 12 weeks period of the study, in each group
V1 (Inclusion), V2 (Randomisation), V3 (1 month), V4 (3 months), V5 (6 months)
Evolution of Time spent Below Range (TBR)
Time Frame: V1 (Inclusion), V2 (Randomisation), V3 (1 month), V4 (3 months), V5 (6 months)
Evolution of the time spent <54 mg/dL and <70 mg/dL, between visits V1-V2, V2-V4, V2-V5, and over the last 12 weeks period of the study, in each group
V1 (Inclusion), V2 (Randomisation), V3 (1 month), V4 (3 months), V5 (6 months)
Body Mass Index change
Time Frame: V1 (Inclusion), V2 (Randomisation), V5 (6 months)
Body Mass Index change (Mean value, Standard Deviation) between visits V1-V2, and V2-V5, in each group
V1 (Inclusion), V2 (Randomisation), V5 (6 months)
Glucose sensor measurement change
Time Frame: V1 (Inclusion), V2 (Randomisation), V3 (1 month), V4 (3 months), V5 (6 months)
Evolution of glucose sensor measurements (Mean value, Standard Deviation) between visits V1-V2, V2-V4, V2-V5, and over the last 12 weeks period of the study, in each group
V1 (Inclusion), V2 (Randomisation), V3 (1 month), V4 (3 months), V5 (6 months)
Percentage of patients with TIR > 70%
Time Frame: V1 (Inclusion), V2 (Randomisation), V3 (1 month), V4 (3 months), V5 (6 months)
Percentage of patients having spent >70% of their time in the target glucose range (70-180 mg/dL) between visits V1-V2, V2-V4, V2-V5, and over the last 12 weeks period of the study, in each group
V1 (Inclusion), V2 (Randomisation), V3 (1 month), V4 (3 months), V5 (6 months)
Percentage of patients with TIR > 70% and TBR < 4%, and with TIR > 70% and TBR < 1%
Time Frame: V1 (Inclusion), V2 (Randomisation), V3 (1 month), V4 (3 months), V5 (6 months)
Percentage of patients having spent >70% of their time in the target glucose range (70-180 mg/dL) and <4% of their time below range (54 to 70 mg/dL) and percentage of patients having spent >70% of their time in the target glucose range (70-180 mg/dL) and <1% of their time below range (54 to 70 mg/dL) between visits V1-V2, V2-V4, V2-V5, and over the last 12 weeks period of the study, in each group
V1 (Inclusion), V2 (Randomisation), V3 (1 month), V4 (3 months), V5 (6 months)
Evolution of glucose management indicator (GMI)
Time Frame: V1 (Inclusion), V2 (Randomisation), V3 (1 month), V4 (3 months), V5 (6 months)
Evolution of glucose management indicator values between visits V1-V2, V2-V4, V2-V5, and over the last 12 weeks period of the study, in each group
V1 (Inclusion), V2 (Randomisation), V3 (1 month), V4 (3 months), V5 (6 months)
Evolution of dosage of insulin
Time Frame: V1 (Inclusion), V2 (Randomisation), V3 (1 month), V4 (3 months), V5 (6 months)
Modification of total daily dose of insulin, of basal dose of insulin and bolus dose of insulin between Visit V1-V2, between visits V1-V2, V2-V4, V2-V5, and over the last 12 weeks period of the study, in each group
V1 (Inclusion), V2 (Randomisation), V3 (1 month), V4 (3 months), V5 (6 months)
Time of device usage and time in automatic mode of insulin delivery (hybrid closed loop)
Time Frame: V1 (Inclusion), V2 (Randomisation), V3 (1 month), V4 (3 months), V5 (6 months)
Time of sensor usage in percentage and time spent in Auto Mode during study
V1 (Inclusion), V2 (Randomisation), V3 (1 month), V4 (3 months), V5 (6 months)
Evolution of Self-administered Questionnaires scores
Time Frame: V1 (Inclusion), V5 (6 months)
Evolution of Self-administered Questionnaire Hypoglycaemia Fear Survey (HFS) score between visits V1 and V5
V1 (Inclusion), V5 (6 months)
Evolution of Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction score
Time Frame: V1 (Inclusion), V5 (6 months)
Evolution of Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire status (DTSQs) score between visits V1 and V5
V1 (Inclusion), V5 (6 months)
Safety Events
Time Frame: V1 (Inclusion), V2 (Randomisation), V3 (1 month), V4 (3 months), V5 (6 months)
Occurrence of Safety Events as defined by ISO 14155, including severe hypoglycaemia and ketoacidosis, local tolerance events related to devices (pump and sensor), incidents occuring with Medtrum devices
V1 (Inclusion), V2 (Randomisation), V3 (1 month), V4 (3 months), V5 (6 months)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Extension phase: Assessment of Automatic Meal Management function in Hybrid Closed Loop group on TIR
Time Frame: V2 (Randomisation), V3 (1 month), V4 (3 months), V5 (6 months), V6 (7 months)
Evolution of the time spent in the target glucose range of 70-180 mg/dL based on sensor measured glucose concentrations between visits V2-V6 and V5-V6
V2 (Randomisation), V3 (1 month), V4 (3 months), V5 (6 months), V6 (7 months)
Extension phase: Assessment of Automatic Meal Management function in Hybrid Closed Loop group on glucose sensor measurements
Time Frame: V2 (Randomisation), V3 (1 month), V4 (3 months), V5 (6 months), V6 (7 months)
Evolution of glucose sensor measurements (Mean value, Standard Deviation) between visits V2-V6 and V5-V6
V2 (Randomisation), V3 (1 month), V4 (3 months), V5 (6 months), V6 (7 months)
Extension phase: Assessment of Automatic Meal Management function in Hybrid Closed Loop group on TAR
Time Frame: V2 (Randomisation), V3 (1 month), V4 (3 months), V5 (6 months), V6 (7 months)
Evolution of the time spent >180 mg/dL and >250 mg/dL, from V2 to V6, and V5 to V6
V2 (Randomisation), V3 (1 month), V4 (3 months), V5 (6 months), V6 (7 months)
Extension phase: Assessment of Automatic Meal Management function in Hybrid Closed Loop group on TBR
Time Frame: V2 (Randomisation), V3 (1 month), V4 (3 months), V5 (6 months), V6 (7 months)
Evolution of the time spent <54 mg/dL and <70 mg/dL, from V2 to V6, and V5 to V6
V2 (Randomisation), V3 (1 month), V4 (3 months), V5 (6 months), V6 (7 months)
Extension phase: Assessment of Automatic Meal Management function in Hybrid Closed Loop group on GMI
Time Frame: V2 (Randomisation), V3 (1 month), V4 (3 months), V5 (6 months), V6 (7 months)
Evolution of glucose management indicator values from V2 to V6, from V5 to V6
V2 (Randomisation), V3 (1 month), V4 (3 months), V5 (6 months), V6 (7 months)
Extension phase: Assessment of Automatic Meal Management function in Hybrid Closed Loop group on dosage of insulin
Time Frame: V2 (Randomisation), V3 (1 month), V4 (3 months), V5 (6 months), V6 (7 months)
Modification of total daily dose of insulin, of basal dose of insulin and bolus dose of insulin from V2 to V6, from V5 to V6
V2 (Randomisation), V3 (1 month), V4 (3 months), V5 (6 months), V6 (7 months)
Extension phase: Assessment of Automatic Meal Management function in Hybrid Closed Loop group on Self-administered Questionnaires scores
Time Frame: V5 (6 months), V6 (7 months)
Evolution of Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire status (DTSQs) score between visits V5 and V6
V5 (6 months), V6 (7 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Freddy PENFORNIS, Centre Hospitalier Sud-Francilien, Corbeil

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 5, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 12, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 17, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 1 Diabetes

Clinical Trials on Insulin Management System in Manual mode of operation

Subscribe